People call it "Soak Testing" when they test electronics don't they?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
nah
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen P. Potter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Febr
Lightning flashed, thunder crashed and Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
whispered:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| PIT - Perl Intergration Testers
|
| Alan Burlison
Not to pick on Alan, God knows he's been doing us all a real favor lately
with the leaktest stuff. But can we please stop crossposting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIT - Perl Intergration Testers
Alan Burlison
abigail [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*>
*>What are you suggesting here? God doesn't like elves? There's no place
*>in heaven for hobbits? Everyone is equal in the face of God, except
*>dwarves? Christ doesn't wash the feet of trolls? Jesus didn't die so
*>Gollums sins could be forgiven?
People hag
"H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> >
> > Likewise. What's wrong w
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:40:01AM -0800, Jonathan Atzger wrote:
>
> If I were a fundamentalist Christian, would it be
> right for me to complain about Tolkein quotes buried
> in the Perl source code on the grounds that they
> offend my personal beliefs?
What are you suggesting here? God doesn't
jezz, this is nutso. the term smokers that schwern chose refers to
smoking code as in testing it to see if it blows up in a blaze of flame
and smoke. in the hardware world powering up a box or power supply for
the first time is known as a smoke test (you don't want to see any smoke
then). the nam
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 15:45 + 2001.02.19, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko H
> > > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> > >
> > > Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
> >
> > Same here. Testers?
>
> perl-builders?
I vote for perl-builders
&Vadim;
I agree with Johan...
Fabio.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Vromans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 11:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Discussion
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > > As
--- Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different
name.
>
> -- Johan
I don't mean to be rude, but what does this have to do
with Perl? How many times must worthwhile projects
break down because people start to allow bickering and
irrelevancies to
Sigh. That's right. Let's start this off by being
politically correct. We don't want any humor creeping
in here.
--- Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different
name.
>
> -- Johan
__
Do You Yah
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > > As an active non-sm
No. This is silly. End of discussion.
PS I'm also an active non-smoker.
--
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
> >
> > Likewise.
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
>
> Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
Same here. Testers?
--
H.Merijn Brand
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
Likewise. What's wrong with builders?
> -- Johan
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is '
As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
-- Johan
19 matches
Mail list logo
