According to John Tobey:
> Actually, your way is probably better, assuming the methods can
> theoretically all work on any Aggr.
They can. Consider pseudohashes, the base pointers of all evil:
$a = [ \%FIELDS, 1, 2, 3 ];
%$a = ();# clear_hash()
@$a = ();
Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to John Tobey:
> > // Hash-specific:
> > -virtual void clear_hash();
> > -virtual void set_hash_capacity(size_t n);
> > +virtual void hash_clear();
> > +virtual void hash_set_capacity(size_t n);
> > virtual void hash_assign_simple(size_t
According to John Tobey:
> I think that I will learn more about Perl 5 from reading Topaz's
> header files than I did from reading Perl 5's header files.
It could happen. C++ encourages putting a lot more info in headers.
Re: Consistent naming:
> -void clear_array()
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 00:04:55 -0700
> From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Bowing to popular demand. The release notes are below. For
> instructions on using SourceForge's CVS servers for Topaz, see:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=1020>
>
> Share & Enjoy!
Excellent!
Bowing to popular demand. The release notes are below. For
instructions on using SourceForge's CVS servers for Topaz, see:
https://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=1020>
Share & Enjoy!
PS: We could use a little more sophisticated Makefile system
---
