On 10/14/22 6:03 PM, Ralph Mellor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:59 PM Joseph Polanik wrote:
Update: ... all methods are reporting correct results.
Thanks for the help.
Good to see resolution of problems. :)
Is everything now resolved or are some things still outstanding?
--
love,
On 10/14/22 5:48 PM, Bruce Gray wrote:
On Oct 14, 2022, at 3:23 PM, Joseph Polanik wrote:
The script Run/run_SequenceHelper.raku contains only the following lines
use lib '~/Documents/myRaku/gitHub/SequenceHelper/lib';
use SequenceHelper :ALL;
--snip--
A possible piece of the puzzle is that
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 10:59 PM Joseph Polanik wrote:
>
> Update: ... all methods are reporting correct results.
>
> Thanks for the help.
Good to see resolution of problems. :)
Is everything now resolved or are some things still outstanding?
--
love, raiph
> On Oct 14, 2022, at 3:23 PM, Joseph Polanik wrote:
>
>> The script Run/run_SequenceHelper.raku contains only the following lines
>>> use lib '~/Documents/myRaku/gitHub/SequenceHelper/lib';
>>> use SequenceHelper :ALL;
--snip--
A possible piece of the puzzle is that your `use` line is
I like the way you use ~ in `use lib '~/...';`. Though it doesn't work as
expected. But it's nice! :D
Best regards,
Vadim Belman
> On Oct 14, 2022, at 4:05 PM, Joseph Polanik wrote:
>
> On 10/14/22 3:38 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>>> On 14 Oct 2022, at 21:15, Joseph Polanik
>>>
On 10/14/22 4:53 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
raku --ll-exception -Idir-with-module Run/run_SequenceHelper.raku
I hope you changed "dir-with-module" by the actual directory name.
I didn't. My bad. Now, four subs are producing correct results
raku --ll-exception
> On 14 Oct 2022, at 22:23, Joseph Polanik wrote:
>
> On 10/14/22 4:15 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>
>> The script Run/run_SequenceHelper.raku contains only the following lines
>>> use lib '~/Documents/myRaku/gitHub/SequenceHelper/lib';
>>> use SequenceHelper :ALL;
>> OOC, what happens if
On 10/14/22 4:15 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
The script Run/run_SequenceHelper.raku contains only the following lines
use lib '~/Documents/myRaku/gitHub/SequenceHelper/lib';
use SequenceHelper :ALL;
OOC, what happens if you remove the :ALL here?
No change that I can see:
raku
> On 14 Oct 2022, at 22:05, Joseph Polanik wrote:
>
> On 10/14/22 3:38 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>>> On 14 Oct 2022, at 21:15, Joseph Polanik wrote:
>>> Actually, I did create a factorial() sub, but that didn't get me out of my
>>> present predicament. It works as expected when
On 10/14/22 3:38 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
On 14 Oct 2022, at 21:15, Joseph Polanik wrote:
Actually, I did create a factorial() sub, but that didn't get me out
of my present predicament. It works as expected when invoked from the
command line. However, when invoked from a test script (or
> On 14 Oct 2022, at 21:15, Joseph Polanik wrote:
> Actually, I did create a factorial() sub, but that didn't get me out of my
> present predicament. It works as expected when invoked from the command line.
> However, when invoked from a test script (or the REPL) the error message is
>
On 10/14/22 11:39 AM, Parrot Raiser wrote:
The cause of the problem may well need to be fixed for other reasons,
but re-purposing an almost universal operator like "!" ("not") sounds
like a thoroughly bad idea, the route to non-standard code.
If you must have a factorial operator, what's wrong
> On 14 Oct 2022, at 20:35, Joseph Polanik wrote:
> Each of these results is correct. So, the problem remains that some subs are
> not found when invoked either from a test script or from the REPL.
>
> Is there some cache that I must clear when changing a .rakumod file to
> prevent my system
On 10/14/22 4:32 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
I cannot reproduce:
% cat lib/A.rakumod
sub postfix: ($n) is export {
when $n == 0 {return 1}
default {$n * ($n - 1)!}
}
% raku -e 'use lib "lib"; use A; say 42!'
14050061177528798985431426062445115699363840
Very helpful. I
The cause of the problem may well need to be fixed for other reasons,
but re-purposing an almost universal operator like "!" ("not") sounds
like a thoroughly bad idea, the route to non-standard code.
If you must have a factorial operator, what's wrong with defining "Fact"?
On 10/14/22, Elizabeth
I cannot reproduce:
% cat lib/A.rakumod
sub postfix: ($n) is export {
when $n == 0 {return 1}
default {$n * ($n - 1)!}
}
% raku -e 'use lib "lib"; use A; say 42!'
14050061177528798985431426062445115699363840
% raku -v
Welcome to Rakudo™ v2022.07-64-gce1af0fa0.
Implementing the
16 matches
Mail list logo
