Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

[kongf@falcon1 git.hypre]$ git rev-parse --git-dir .git [kongf@falcon1 git.hypre]$ echo $? 0 [kongf@falcon1 git.hypre]$ [kongf@falcon1 git.hypre]$ git fsck Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done. Checking objects: 100% (22710/22710), done. [kongf@falcon1 git.hypre]$ But the same

Re: [petsc-users] How to change optimization flags?

COPTFLAGS is meant for optimization flags but CFLAGS should also work. However since each of them have their own defaults - you would use the correct one to override the defaults. If the option you specify is not picked up - mostlikely petsc configure attempted to use it - and configure rejected

Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

balay@asterix /home/balay $ git rev-parse --git-dir fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount point /) Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set). balay@asterix /home/balay $ echo $? 128 balay@asterix /home/balay $ cd petsc balay@asterix

[petsc-users] No VecGetLocalSubVector?

Is there a reason why there is no 'VecGetLocalSubVector' to match MatGetLocalSubMatrix? I've used VecGetSubVector, but can't use local indices with it, e.g. can't use VecSetValuesLocal. Garth

Re: [petsc-users] [petsc-maint] how to check if cell is local owned in DMPlex

Hi All, Thanks again for all your help during my code development and it turns out the DMPlex for unstructured grid works pretty well. I have another question.  Is there any alternative method to get number of leaves without using PetscSFGetGraph? Based on my test, this function works

Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote: > > > > If you need to workarround this - you can comment out that test > (3lines).. > > > > > > File "/home/kongf/workhome/projects/petsc-3.7.7/config/ > > >

Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > Its strange that you are getting this error in configure - but not command > linke. > > Does the following option make a difference? > > --useThreads=0 > or > --useThreads=1 > no difference. > > If you need to

Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote: > > If you need to workarround this - you can comment out that test (3lines).. > > > > File "/home/kongf/workhome/projects/petsc-3.7.7/config/ > > BuildSystem/config/package.py", line 519, in updateGitDir > > gitdir,err,ret = > >

Re: [petsc-users] Leaking Memory From the Future????

Your description is really vague and I doubt this has anything to do with PETSc. Did you recompile before executing the second test? Have you stepped through with gdb or other debugger, and have you run with valgrind? If so, one thing to be extra careful about - do you have anything in global

Re: [petsc-users] Could not execute "['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']"

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Kong, Fande wrote: > > I meant just the 3 lines - not the whole function. > > I knew this. "3 lines" does not work at all. > > I forgot the error message. Then you are likely to use the wrong [git] snapshot - and not the snapshot listed by self.gitcommit - for that package.

Re: [petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

Hi Praveen, did you try to include the PETSC_AVOID_MPIF_H? I mean, include: -DPETSC_AVOID_MPIF_H=1 when using mpiifort and I think that the problem will be solved. 2018-03-07 15:53 GMT+01:00 Praveen C : > Dear all > > In a code like this > > subroutine checkgrid(g) > >

[petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

Dear all In a code like this subroutine checkgrid(g) #include use petscsys use mgrid use celldata use comdata implicit none type(grid),intent(in) :: g ! Local variables integer:: i, j, v, tc, nv PetscInt :: v1, v2 PetscErrorCode :: ierr

Re: [petsc-users] Scaling problem when cores > 600

What are you using for Poisson log. If it is a Poisson problem then almost for sure you should be using Hypre BoomerAMG?. It sounds like your matrix does not change. You will need to discuss the scaling with the hypre people. Barry > On Mar 7, 2018, at 5:38 AM, TAY wee-beng

Re: [petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

Start with one use statement and slowly add more. My guess is multiple ones of those modules use the MPI module hence MPI_SUM appears through multiple paths. Barry > On Mar 7, 2018, at 8:53 AM, Praveen C wrote: > > Dear all > > In a code like this > > subroutine

Re: [petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

You have multiple use make sure they don't have multiple paths back to MPI. For example if two of them have use petscsys etc Barry > On Mar 7, 2018, at 10:11 AM, Praveen C wrote: > > > >> On 07-Mar-2018, at 9:34 PM, Smith, Barry F.

Re: [petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

> On 07-Mar-2018, at 9:52 PM, Smith, Barry F. wrote: > > You have multiple > >use > >make sure they don't have multiple paths back to MPI. For example if two > of them have use petscsys etc > > Barry None of the other modules I include have “use

Re: [petsc-users] error with MPI + ifort

One gets such a error message if mpif.h is used in multiple modules. mpi.mod [if used] is one module that will have this symbol. And if there is a user module [or petsc module] also using mpif.h - then it will get a duplicate copy of these symbols - and will result in such a conflict. Satish