On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:21, Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> ANYWAY: I am rebuilding betas with pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm and will upload
> them during the night. It will take me some time because I have to rebuild
> wxWindows as well. I missed the information to upgrade to 20030722...
Dear friends,
R
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 August 2003 14:51
To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
Dear all,
I agree with Raphaël. We cannot have two naming
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56
> To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
> On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:
On Friday 08 August 2003 16:09, Dave Page wrote:
> What do other projects do?
Some projects like Wine use date time for release numbers. Very few projects
use dates. It would solve many problems in my opinion, because anyone
understands a date.
Release number + date gives you a precise informat
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2003 20:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page; Andreas Pflug
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
It will take me
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56
To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
Dear friends,
Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2003 14:51
> To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I agree
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 August 2003 20:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page; Andreas Pflug
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
> Jean-Michel POURE
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 August 2003 15:28
To: Dave Page
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
If you look to what I did in debian packages,
the actual beta is 0.9.0-0.1
if we build a snapshot
Hi Guys,
I have corrected the naming on some of the uploaded beta releases as
they were inconsistant. For reference, let's try to use something like:
Snapshots
=
pgadmin3-mmdd.tgz
pgadmin3-mmdd.txt
pgadmin3-mmdd.tar.gz
pgadmin3-mmdd.i386.rpm
Releases
pgadmin3-x
Dave Page wrote:
Hi Guys,
I have corrected the naming on some of the uploaded beta releases as
they were inconsistant. For reference, let's try to use something like:
> Snapshots
=
pgadmin3-mmdd.tgz
pgadmin3-mmdd.txt
pgadmin3-mmdd.tar.gz
pgadmin3-mmdd.i386.rpm
Releases
===
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
It will take me some time because I have to rebuild
wxWindows as well. I missed the information to upgrade to 20030722...
I missed it too... Did you find any mail concerning this ? Wasn't it a
wx snap that was about to become the supported one but gave some problem
at
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 August 2003 20:25
> To: Dave Page; Raphaël Enrici
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
> On Friday 08 August 2003 16:09, D
On Friday 08 August 2003 17:21, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> So shall the rpm packages, and
> may be some other, be rebuilt for this beta release ? If so, Jean Michel
> do you need some help concerning this work ?
Dear friends,
RPM packages are named:
name-version-release.rpm
A version can be 0.9.0,
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 August 2003 14:53
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
I Totally agree with Dave. But don't you think we could go
further ? As
> -Original Message-
> From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2003 14:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>
>
>
> I Totally agree with Dave. But don't yo
Dear all,
I agree with Raphaël. We cannot have two naming conventions for technical
reasons. It is not possible to change the version of an RPM at file system
level. Furthermore, users should be able to install from snapshots, then
upgrade with beta, then install snapshots, etc...
Cheers,
Jean
17 matches
Mail list logo
