Message d'origine
Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:35:57 +0100
De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to.
I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, however I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2004 10:54
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
So, I SHOUT! :)
grin
Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I SHOUT! :)
Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once.
As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much)
and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian.
FC2 should be ok now thanks to
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2004 09:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Well, this is an unfortunate situation. Beta1 win32 should
roll ASAP
Dave Page wrote:
Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source
tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created,
that's it.
I meant to release Beta1 win32 as binary only.
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2004 09:29
To: Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Dave Page wrote:
Also, don't forget that everything
Dave Page wrote:
Yes, but to do that (properly) I need to produce the tarball first.
That's the best way to ensure consistent releases. Or are you saying
that we ignore consistency in this instance?
I don't understand the problem. The binary is for pginstaller only, and
its supporting files
I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to.
I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, however I'm not convinced
this is something that need holdup production of the source tarball.
If anyone disagrees or has any other objections, please let me know
ASAP.
