Message d'origine
>Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 09:51:10 +0100
>De: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: "Andreas Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Copie à: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROT
Dave Page wrote:
Because it will claim to be beta1 even though it does not reflect and
cannot be rebuilt exactly the official beta1 tarball.
If we agree not to change anything for win32, it *can* be rebuilt from a
later tarball, no?
Sod it though it's only beta 1... I'll bump the version numb
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 09:46
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >
> > Y
Dave Page wrote:
Yes, but to do that (properly) I need to produce the tarball first.
That's the best way to ensure consistent releases. Or are you saying
that we ignore consistency in this instance?
I don't understand the problem. The binary is for pginstaller only, and
its supporting files (langu
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 09:29
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
>
Dave Page wrote:
Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source
tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created,
that's it.
I meant to release Beta1 win32 as binary only.
Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 09:06
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> Well, this is an unfortunate situation. Be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I SHOUT! :)
Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once.
As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much)
and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian.
FC2 should be ok now thanks to Dieg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2004 10:54
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>
> So, I SHOUT! :)
> Can you let us a couple of day to
Message d'origine
>Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
>Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:35:57 +0100
>De: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to.
>I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, howev
10 matches
Mail list logo
