Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Message d'origine Sujet: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:35:57 +0100 De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to. I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, however I'm not convinced this is something that need holdup production of the source tarball. If anyone disagrees or has any other objections, please let me know ASAP. So, I SHOUT! :) Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once. As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much) and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian. FC2 should be ok now thanks to Diego and Devrim but we should document the way --with-wx* configure options work as it was just the way to call them which was not correct. Can we wait until the WE ? Thx. Raphaël ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 10:54 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta So, I SHOUT! :) grin Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once. As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much) and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian. Thought that one was resolved... FC2 should be ok now thanks to Diego and Devrim but we should document the way --with-wx* configure options work as it was just the way to call them which was not correct. From what I could gather, the configure script failed to run the symlinked wx-config, which I can only imagine is a shell issue, but yes, a doc would help. Can we wait until the WE ? We can, but I can't hold off the postgresql-win32 beta any more, so we will have to ship the current cvs tip with that. Regards, Dave ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I SHOUT! :) Can you let us a couple of day to manage all the build to be tested at least once. As discussed yesterday evening, I have some stuff to review (should not be too much) and I must take care of keyboard issues under debian. FC2 should be ok now thanks to Diego and Devrim but we should document the way --with-wx* configure options work as it was just the way to call them which was not correct. Can we wait until the WE ? Thx. Well, this is an unfortunate situation. Beta1 win32 should roll ASAP to be included in pginstaller Beta2 (which is overdue), but we need time for *ix. I'd vote for making a code freeze now, bumping up the version to Beta1 now, but delaying cvs tagging until all configuration stuff is fixed. This way, we can get Beta1 for win32 out now, and have the time to tidy up for *ix beta. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 09:06 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta Well, this is an unfortunate situation. Beta1 win32 should roll ASAP to be included in pginstaller Beta2 (which is overdue), but we need time for *ix. I'd vote for making a code freeze now, bumping up the version to Beta1 now, but delaying cvs tagging until all configuration stuff is fixed. This way, we can get Beta1 for win32 out now, and have the time to tidy up for *ix beta. Hmm, I'm not convinced the fc2 issue is one we can fix anyway (it's trying to execute the right file, just seems to be failing because it's a symlink - which shouldn't happen of course). The other issue is the 'f' key on Debian - are we simply waiting for confirmation that the newer compiler resolves that? Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created, that's it. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Dave Page wrote: Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created, that's it. I meant to release Beta1 win32 as binary only. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 09:29 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta Dave Page wrote: Also, don't forget that everything at release is built from the source tarball, and not CVS (at least it should be). So once that is created, that's it. I meant to release Beta1 win32 as binary only. Yes, but to do that (properly) I need to produce the tarball first. That's the best way to ensure consistent releases. Or are you saying that we ignore consistency in this instance? Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
Dave Page wrote: Yes, but to do that (properly) I need to produce the tarball first. That's the best way to ensure consistent releases. Or are you saying that we ignore consistency in this instance? I don't understand the problem. The binary is for pginstaller only, and its supporting files (languages) might differ slightly from the official pgAdmin3 beta release (if we allow it) which we wouldn't publish and announce until cvs is tagged. The version number of pgAdmin3 that's included in pgInstaller should reflect that it is functionally identical to pgAdmin3 Beta1. How should this affect consistency? Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
[pgadmin-hackers] Ready to roll beta
I plan to roll 1.2beta1 tomorrow unless anyone has a good reason not to. I know there is an outstanding issue with FC2, however I'm not convinced this is something that need holdup production of the source tarball. If anyone disagrees or has any other objections, please let me know ASAP. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
