Thom Brown writes:
> Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example
> attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended
> panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's
> still probably wrong.
At least it would grate on somebody's nerves once
On 16 May 2013 17:33, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example
>> attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended
>> panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's
>> still probably wrong.
>
> A
Hi all,
Someone added a comment to the docs mentioning that an example
attempting to use a well-known panagram is actually not the intended
panagram. They also point out that this isn't important, but it's
still probably wrong.
It appears here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions
