[DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the documentation and other written resources. A change along that line has already been made in the FAQ. Many points have been made recently on the name of the project or

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to use "Postgres" > alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the documentation and other > written resources. A change along that line has already been made in

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to use > "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the > documentation and other written resources. A change along that line > has already been made in the F

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to use >> "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the >> documentation and other writt

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> David Fetter wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Some of you

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> David Fetter wrote: > >>

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to > >> use "Postgres" a

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Fetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be >> reverted. > That, or (my preference) make the cha