[GENERAL] Intel Skylake hardware failures

This might interest some members. It has been announced by Intel's latest Skylake CPU has serious bug which hangs applications with complex threading which postgresql could *potentially* fall into. I don't know if anyone has experienced this or not. "Hello All, Intel has identified an issue

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Kevin Grittner writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I thought we were already at that point; see Regina Obe's posts. > Oh, are you referring to this:? > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/001201d14c96$fc26ed70$f474c850$@pcorp.us

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> 2. The CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is purely a > recipient response and usually the offended individual is more interested in > being a victim than moving forward. Here is my latest version. Let me know if I should throw in a github repo so it's easier to

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

"Joshua D. Drake" writes: > How about we meet in the middle: > A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > of non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual > orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or >

[GENERAL] Building PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows

Can anyone help me figure out how to run/debug PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows? This is a cross post with http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34733991/building-postgresql-in-eclipse-on-windows : I'm trying to build|PosgreSQL|in Eclipse CDT Mars on Windows using the MinGW-64 gcc 5.3.0 I

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

Thanks Joshua for creating this list. Great starting point and hopefully points to focus on to conclude this thread. Here are my humble comments on them. I think point two is already covered by respecting other people's opinion. At times specially over email ,where we don't see others

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:00:22PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical > appearance, body size or race. ... for of _off-topic_ comments related to ... Since

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

(Sorry for the dup post. I felt having a clean thread without having to cross-reference was worth the minor faux pas.) > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size or race.

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> So is life. We aren't here to wipe butts and change a diaper. But the original isn't constructive of what to do. If I am attacked personally I will feel offended, the point is what I do about it. Whining about bring offended vs bringing it up and saying that it is not acceptable behaviour are

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

tl;dr; * Modified #2 to be less harsh. * Modified #3 with TGL and James comments * Did not remove examples as I believe they are vital to the success I saw Regina's post, I believe it is good for context but I also believe that something concise and to the point is the better path.

Re: [GENERAL] Offline Tablespaces and Partial Restore

On 1/11/16 8:41 AM, Pedro França wrote: I've tried to put the data on another database but it didn't help as tablespaces are required cluster-wide on startup. If putting the data in a separate database works for you then it wouldn't be a big leap to put it in a separate cluster.

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Steve, Please see the new thread WIP: CoC V2 -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so everyone else

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

Hello, Below please find a WIP CoC for the PostgreSQL.Org project: PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing

Re: [GENERAL] 9.4 -> 9.5 upgrade problem when both python2 and python3 present

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: /tmp/mutt-mayon-1000-19386-284b6a00794950f414 > Paul Jones writes: > > pg_upgrade complains about not being able to find $libdir/plpython3 > > when upgrading a 9.4 cluster that has both python2 and python3 used. > > No,

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> We value the opinions of members who have contributed most more than we value > the opinions of others. > A CoC is not the place to say some animals are more equal than others. A core > commiter calling someone the n- or b- words is just as bad as me, a non > commiter (if not worse!) Yes

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

>> We value the opinions of members who have contributed most more than > we value the opinions of others. > >> A CoC is not the place to say some animals are more equal than others. A > core commiter calling someone the n- or b- words is just as bad as me, a > non commiter (if not worse!) > >

Re: [GENERAL] Slow Query - PostgreSQL 9.2

On 1/11/16, Saulo Merlo wrote: > Ok, thanks Vitaly. > I need to create a TEXT or VARCHAR index. > and another one with timestamptz > How can I do?Thanks How to create indexes of different types is written at [1]. But I thing you need something else. You have to create index

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> """ A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of > non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual orientation, > disability, physical appearance, body size or race. """ I really think you should leave out the whole " gender, sexual orientation,

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:42 PM, FarjadFarid(ChkNet) wrote: Five days (and I don't know how many posts) ago, there was this: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160106184818.gt21...@crankycanuck.ca Which said in part: > The other thing I note is that the

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

"Regina Obe" writes: > How would you feel about the original thread that started this. > https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 > I would dismiss her as a troll and kindly say, don't tell us who we can have > and who we can't. Hm ... that thread makes me uncomfortable, because I

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

On 01/11/2016 02:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote: On 01/11/2016 02:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Hello, Below please find a WIP CoC for the PostgreSQL.Org project: PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

> 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size or race. why not > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of ad hominem. (Tip: Ask your self

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

Adrian Klaver wrote: > On 01/11/2016 02:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > >comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical > >appearance, body size or race. > > Well that renders this thread: > >

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

On 12/01/16 11:21, Karsten Hilbert wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:00:22PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size or race. ... for of

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 01/11/2016 02:27 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 01/11/2016 02:22 PM, Brian Dunavant wrote: 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size or race. I think you meant "free OF

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 01/11/2016 02:41 PM, Brian Dunavant wrote: "3) A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of negative personal criticism directed at a member of a community, rather than at the technical merit of a topic." A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 01/11/2016 02:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote: "Joshua D. Drake" writes: How about we meet in the middle: A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of non-technical or personal comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical

[GENERAL] plv8 binaries for PostgreSQL 9.5 on Windows

Where can I find binaries for plv8 for PostgreSQL 9.5 for Windows? Thanks, -- Igal Sapir Lucee Core Developer Lucee.org

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

Dear all, Please let's not be pedantic and expect absolute legalistic perfection in the wordings that has been put forward. No doubt we all understand the spirit and the purpose of the wording. Which is when we are consulting in the community we are not to here to discuss other people's

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

>> "3) A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is >> free of negative personal criticism directed at a member of a >> community, rather than at the technical merit of a topic." >> > A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > of non-technical or

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

On 1/11/2016 6:41 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote: > >> On 12 Jan 2016, at 0:16, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >> 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of >> non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to gender, >> sexual

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Kevin Grittner writes: > I'm going to give this a belated +1, and ignore any further posts on > this thread. > If someone wants to take the step of posting a concrete proposal, > please start a new thread with a different subject line. I thought we were already at that point;

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Grittner writes: >> If someone wants to take the step of posting a concrete proposal, >> please start a new thread with a different subject line. > > I thought we were already at that point; see

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is one that focuses on the technical merit of ideas and solutions rather than on the person behind them. I still prefer this wording as there is no need for us to list the ways in which someone can personally be attacked. Should the

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

Why must it be free of personal comments? "Tom, I like the way you handed this issue. Good work!" Is a personal comment. Why do we need lists? What specifically is wrong with "that focuses on the tech and not the person" version? Jim On January 11, 2016 6:04:03 PM EST, "Joshua D. Drake"

Re: [GENERAL] Slow Query - PostgreSQL 9.2

Thanks Vitaly for all your help. I'll have a very deep look on the links you have provided. In the meantime, I'll also post here what I need.. IF you could help one more time, would be very very nice. Thank you again. This can either be nfs_file_path or nfs_migration_date (both new columns).

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:00:23 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake" wrote: > A CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is > purely a recipients response and usually because the recipient is > more interested in being a victim than moving forward. I've seen text like

[GENERAL] WIP: CoC

Hello, Below please find a WIP CoC for the PostgreSQL.Org project: PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Kevin Grittner writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe wrote: >> How would you feel about the original thread that started this. >> https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 > I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread > with

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

ALL: Please move comments to the new thread: WIP: CoC -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't control your own emotions, so

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 01/11/2016 02:22 PM, Brian Dunavant wrote: 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size or race. I think you meant "free OF comments". I did. However it still picks a

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 01/11/2016 02:30 PM, James Keener wrote: (Sorry for the dup post. I felt having a clean thread without having to cross-reference was worth the minor faux pas.) 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of comments related to gender, sexual orientation,

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> We value the opinions of members who have contributed most more than we value > the opinions of others. A CoC is not the place to say some animals are more equal than others. A core commiter calling someone the n- or b- words is just as bad as me, a non commiter (if not worse!) > While we

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V2

> On 12 Jan 2016, at 0:16, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free of > non-technical or personal comments, for example ones related to gender, > sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size,

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On 01/11/2016 01:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Kevin Grittner wrote: On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe wrote: How would you feel about the original thread that started this. https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Regina Obe wrote: > > If we do write a CoC, can we give it a different acronym. > Notwithstanding the most regrettable childhood trauma, this request is > exactly the kind of ridiculousness that the Political Correctness nonsense > associated with CoCs that we should be worried about in the

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)

On 01/11/2016 02:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Hello, Below please find a WIP CoC for the PostgreSQL.Org project: PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> 3. A safe, respectful, productive and collaborative environment is free > comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical > appearance, body size or race. I think you meant "free OF comments". However it still picks a few special classes of complaint, some of which cause

Re: [GENERAL] 9.4 -> 9.5 upgrade problem when both python2 and python3 present

Paul Jones writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> It looks like pg_upgrade tries to load all libraries from functions in >> any database in the old cluster into a single session in the new cluster, >> which will fail in a scenario like this even if

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

Regina Obe wrote: If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are violating. +1 funny! -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Regina Obe wrote: If we do write a CoC, can we give it a different acronym. Notwithstanding the most regrettable childhood trauma, this request is exactly the kind of ridiculousness that the Political Correctness nonsense associated with CoCs that we should be worried about in the

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

Geoff Winkless wrote: On 11 January 2016 at 20:13, Regina Obe wrote: While this is funny to some, I don't think it adds value to this conversation. I would consider it a derailment and not very helpful. If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

On 1/11/2016 4:35 PM, James Keener wrote: To me that's psychological trauma. It's the same psychological trauma I >had to face being born a left-handed and being forced to write with my >right-hand. But it's still not trauma, where is the trauma? Something like Master/Slave to Primary/Replica

Re: Things to notice (was Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?, broken thread I hope)

On 11/01/16 15:00, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Someone (never mind who, this isn't intended to be a blame-game message) wrote: Am I, as a mere male […] :-) It was me. The phrase "Mere Male" was title of a column I read in NZ Women's Weekly that my mother bought when I was a teenager. >>> An

Re: Russian, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On 1/11/16, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:13:32AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > >> Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, >> we >> in Russia are not really concern about this. > > Russian offers a "Mr.Bartunov" and a

Re: Russian, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:50:50AM -0800, Vitaly Burovoy wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:13:32AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > > >> Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, > >> we > >> in Russia are not really concern about this. > > > > Russian offers a

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On 11/01/16 19:13, Oleg Bartunov wrote: [...] Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we in Russia are not really concern about this. [...] I started using 'Gender Appropriate' language long before this PC nonsense started up. Back in those days the word

[GENERAL] BDR: cascading setup

Hi, We are evaluating BDR for a multi-master cross-datacenter replication, with 2 masters actually communicating across datacenter, supplemented by a local in-datacenter replicas to provide HA. Basically, something like M <——> M || S S I could run all nodes as

Japanese, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:27:43PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we > > in Russia are not really concern about this. > > This depends on how

Re: Japanese, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On понедельник, 11 января 2016 г. 12:24:37 MSK, Karsten Hilbert wrote: OTOH, there's a whole bunch of words denoting levels and sublevels of politeness for each and every situation. Politeness but not gender differences. Perhaps just for kids (-chan/-kun). -- Yury Zhuravlev Postgres

Russian, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:13:32AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we > in Russia are not really concern about this. Russian offers a "Mr.Bartunov" and a "Mrs.Bartunova". Am I mistaken ? Karsten Hilbert -- GPG key ID

Re: Japanese, was: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:57:11PM +0300, Yury Zhuravlev wrote: > >OTOH, there's a whole bunch of words denoting levels and > >sublevels of politeness for each and every situation. > Politeness but not gender differences. Perhaps just for kids (-chan/-kun). Well, traditionally not. But

Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> "David G. Johnston" writes: >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

Jim, > That has nothing to do with the Code of Conduct, though. The community > accepting Tom saying "no" to Feature X is vastly different than the community > not calling Tom out for being mean. > The CoC is about the later situation and not the prior; and the community > should call Tom

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Tom Lane wrote: > In my admittedly-limited experience with dealing with such problems, > it's a lot easier to achieve positive results if you can discuss > issues in private, before people's positions harden. > > In short, I wouldn't characterize that complainant as "a troll" for > the substance

[GENERAL] Giving error for function

Hi, I am getting the below error while I am running the below function "add_po_doc_hist", for "c_company" cursor, please suggest what is wrong with code. ERROR: relation "c_company" does not exist CONTEXT: compilation of PL/pgSQL function "add_po_doc_hist" near line 11 ** Error

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

> That has nothing to do with the Code of Conduct, though. The community > accepting Tom saying "no" to Feature X is vastly different than the community > not calling Tom out for being mean. > The CoC is about the later situation and not the prior; and the community > should call Tom out.

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

>> That has nothing to do with the Code of Conduct, though. The >> community accepting Tom saying "no" to Feature X is vastly >> different than the community not calling Tom out for being mean. > >> The CoC is about the later situation and not the prior; and the >> community should call Tom

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V3

tl;dr; * Removed #6 (Social Justice) PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful, productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing to contribute in a safe,

Re: [GENERAL] Building PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: > I downloaded the PostgreSQL source code and tried to follow the docs but > can't figure out where to download the dependencies? 1. libreadline5-dev, 2. > zlib1g-dev, 3. bison (YACC), 4. flex and where to save them to on

Re: [GENERAL] Building PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows

On 1/11/2016 6:21 PM, John R Pierce wrote: wait, are you trying to USE postgres on Eclipse on Windows, or BUILD it ?I would use the enterprisedb build of postgres-for-windows, and then you just need to install the appropriate postgresql jdbc jar file into Eclipse to be able to use it from

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

[ just a few comments on specific points ] "Greg Sabino Mullane" writes: >> 2. The CoC is not about being offended. The act of being offended is >> purely a recipient response and usually the offended individual is more >> interested in being a victim than moving forward. >

Re: [GENERAL] JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6

Hi, Congrats on the official release of 9.5 And I'd like bring up the issue again about if 9.6 would address the jsonb performance issue with large number of top level keys. It is true that it does not have to use JSON format. it is about serialization and fast retrieval of dynamic tree

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 (Wow. I cannot recall a time I've seen so many posts that just make me shake my head in sadness. It's painfully obvious that a code of conduct is way outside the wheelhouse of many of the participants in this thread.) > Below please find a

Re: [GENERAL] WIP: CoC V3

Any reason not to just adopt the contributor covenant? http://contributor-covenant.org/ tl;dr; * Removed #6 (Social Justice) PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) Code of Conduct (CoC): 1. The CoC is to provide community guidelines for creating and enforcing a safe, respectful,

Re: [GENERAL] Building PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows

On 1/11/2016 5:32 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote: Can anyone help me figure out how to run/debug PostgreSQL in Eclipse on Windows? This is a cross post with http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34733991/building-postgresql-in-eclipse-on-windows : I'm trying to build|PosgreSQL|in Eclipse CDT

[GENERAL] row-level security, views and materialized views?

Hi, has there been any discussion as to supporting row-level security policies on materialized views? I didn't have much luck searching on this topic. I see that PostgreSQL 9.5 refuses to create a policy on a materialized view, consistent with the documentation focusing only on tables. First

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

On 11 January 2016 at 21:11, Regina Obe wrote: > The Coc allows light-hearted humor, I'm so disappointed you didn't get my > clever punning in my last email. I thought it was a treasure. Hah! The irony is I had deliberately avoided making the obvious gag because I've been

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

On 1/11/2016 1:11 PM, Regina Obe wrote: On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package all these and use them in regression tests

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

On 01/11/2016 01:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/11/2016 1:11 PM, Regina Obe wrote: On further observation, I realize it can be used as a testcase to test the strength of this Coc. So I stand corrected this is quite relevant and useful to this discussion. In fact, I think we should package

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe wrote: > How would you feel about the original thread that started this. > > https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread with (when I looked) 374 messages, but if the gist of

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Kevin Grittner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe wrote: > > > How would you feel about the original thread that started this. > > > > https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941 > > I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread > with (when I

Re: [GENERAL] Slow Query - PostgreSQL 9.2

On 1/11/16, Saulo Merlo wrote: > NEW QUERY: > > SELECT > <> > WHERE f.nfs_file_path IS NULL > AND ((transaction_timestamp() AT TIME ZONE \'UTC\') > (f.st_mtime+ \'' . > $fileMigrationMonthAge . ' months\' :: INTERVAL)) LIMIT 100; > > From: smerl...@outlook.com > To:

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

I don't know about others. But this whole thread has completely gone off the original track. With so many splinter topics. It has no hope of ever completing with any kind of resolution satisfying even 10% of contributors. Can be please stick to the core original topics? Whether we agree with

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

"Regina Obe" writes: > Sorry screwed up sending this email the first time. Trying again: >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:39:12PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote: >>> If you have contributed nothing to our project and you make >>> demands for change, we will try to tell you that kindly and

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

Geoff, > If there were a CoC that would explicitly disallow occasional lighthearted > humour to a non-development list that is intended to offend no-one then I > would most definitely remove myself from such a project. > Some may consider that a positive thing, but I would like to think that

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct

On 11 January 2016 at 20:13, Regina Obe wrote: > While this is funny to some, I don't think it adds value to this > conversation. I would consider it a derailment and not very helpful. > > If I had a Coc to point at, I would point at the section I feel you are > violating. If

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

> Hmm. I'm not sure that telling us that should amount to an offense; such a person might even have a good idea from time to time. > Now, if the person is rude about it, that would be an offense, but that should already be covered under other sections of the CoC no? > Another possibly

Re: [GENERAL] Packages for Ubuntu Wily

Small update: Today the missing "pgdg-keyring" has been added to the "wily-pgdg" apt repository. My problem is thereby mostly resolved! :-) Now only waiting for a new "pgadmin3" package... Thanks everyone (and especially the package maintainers)! Best regards, Henning. -- Henning Hoefer

[GENERAL] 9.4 -> 9.5 upgrade problem when both python2 and python3 present

pg_upgrade complains about not being able to find $libdir/plpython3 when upgrading a 9.4 cluster that has both python2 and python3 used. Both the 9.4 and 9.5 PGs have been built from source with python2/3 in the recommended way and the plpython3.so is present in /usr/local/pgsql/lib. I dropped

[GENERAL] Offline Tablespaces and Partial Restore

I'm evaluating the use of PostgreSQL to our production mission-critical application that currently runs on SQL Server 2012. There is a huge partitioned table of archived information that is occasionally queried (+5TB) and are not required to be 24/7 online. An eventual failure on the filesystem

Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: > When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the query > includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent executions > do not. Once that first display goes off-screen

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

> On Jan 10, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 01/10/2016 10:44 AM, Regina Obe wrote: > >>> JD >> >> This may come as a big shock to many of you, but as a contributor >> I don't care if you are racist, sexist, transphobic or whatever as long as >> you >

Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "David G. Johnston" writes: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Perhaps we should replace the "Watch every Ns" text by the user-given > >> title if a

Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?

Buford Tannen wrote: Regina Obe wrote: Josh informed me you guys are thinking about a CoC. Let me start off by saying that I don't think you need one and in fact having one may be dangerous. ... So please whatever you do, ... do not choose this one or anything that looks like it:

Re: Things to notice (was Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?, broken thread I hope)

Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:10:23PM +1300, Gavin Flower wrote: > The phrase "Mere Male" was title of a column I read in NZ Women's Weekly > that my mother bought when I was a teenager. That's nice. I still found it offensive enough in the context to think it worthy of note. (I'm not really

Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston > > wrote: > >> When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the >

[GENERAL] Unmet dependency Ubuntu 15.10

I am trying to install postgresql-9.5 on Ubuntu 15.10 but I am getting an unmet dependency. cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/pgdg.list deb http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ wily-pgdg main 4.2.0-23-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP ~/r/a/src> sudo apt-get install postgresql-9.5 Reading package lists...

Re: [GENERAL] Unmet dependency Ubuntu 15.10

On 01/09/2016 01:15 PM, Scottix wrote: I am trying to install postgresql-9.5 on Ubuntu 15.10 but I am getting an unmet dependency. Believe that is fixed now: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAG2W7jfm=rx1mG2-9uwPbBiBJ2Ag2kA1iRLp6=pkfvuqe7x...@mail.gmail.com -- Adrian Klaver

Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston > wrote: >> When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the query >> includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent

  1   2   >