What about the pgpass file?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/libpq-pgpass.html
On 11/17/2017 03:06 PM, marcelo wrote:
I need to "emulate" the pg_dump code because the password prompt. Years
ago I write a program (for the QnX environment) that catched some prompt
and emulates the
On 11/17/2017 02:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/17/2017 12:19 PM, marcelo wrote:
Sorry, I was not exact.
I don't need nor like to change pg_dump. Rather, based on pg_dump code, I
need to develop a daemon which can receive a TCP message (from a
privileged app) containing some elements: the
On 11/16/2017 03:13 PM, bricklen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
v9.2.7 (Yes, I know, it's old. Nothing I can do about it.)
During a "whole database" restore using pg_re
Hi,
v9.2.7 (Yes, I know, it's old. Nothing I can do about it.)
During a "whole database" restore using pg_restore of a custom dump, when is
the data actually loaded? I've looked in the list output and don't see any
"load" statements.
Thanks
--
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
Hi,
How is this done in v8.4?
postgres=# SELECT datname, datfrozenxid, age(datfrozenxid)
postgres-# FROM pg_database;
datname | datfrozenxid | age
---+--+---
template1 | 3603334165 | 25735089
template0 | 3603470462 | 25598792
postgres | 3576970250 |
On 10/29/2017 03:37 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Sunday, October 29, 2017, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
Hi,
v8.4.17
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/pg-clog-questions-td2080911.html
<http://www.postgresql-arch
Hi,
v8.4.17
http://www.postgresql-archive.org/pg-clog-questions-td2080911.html
According to this old thread, doing a VACUUM on every table in the
postgres, template1 and TAPd databases should remove old pg_clog files.
postgres=# SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
datname
On 10/18/2017 10:16 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
On 10/18/2017 7:45 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to 10.0?
There's no way we're going to put an x.0.0 version into production
On 10/18/2017 09:34 AM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
On 10/18/2017 6:24 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> writes:
Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
It's en
On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> writes:
Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
It's entirely possible you'll need *less*, as you'll be absorbing the
benefit of several years'
Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed when
moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
Thanks
--
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 10/09/2017 01:02 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
Maybe my original question wasn't clear, so I'll try again: is it safe
to do a physical using cp (as opposed to r
reason
the backup needs to be human-readable, this is the approach of choice as well.
Darren
The first
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
Hi,
v8.4.20
This is what the current backup script use
On 10/09/2017 11:33 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
Hi,
v8.4.20
This is what the current backup script uses:
/usr/bin/psql -U postgres -c "SELECT
rom: *<pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org> on behalf of Ron Johnson
<ron.l.john...@cox.net>
*Date: *Monday, October 9, 2017 at 8:41 AM
*To: *"pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
*Subject: *[GENERAL] Using cp to back up a database?
Hi,
v8.4.20
Hi,
v8.4.20
This is what the current backup script uses:
/usr/bin/psql -U postgres -c "SELECT pg_start_backup('Incrementalbackup',true);"
cp -r /var/lib/pgsql/data/* $dumpdir/data/
/usr/bin/psql -U postgres template1 -c "SELECT pg_stop_backup();"
Should it use rsync or pg_dump instead?
On 09/20/2017 01:05 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> writes:
On 09/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
[snip]
The DB is 10TB total size with OLTP plus some occasional heavy batching
which frequently correlates with degradation that requires interv
On 09/19/2017 05:00 PM, Jerry Sievers wrote:
[snip]
The DB is 10TB total size with OLTP plus some occasional heavy batching
which frequently correlates with degradation that requires intervention.
Unrelated server problem forced us to relocate from a Debian/Wheezy 3.x
kernel 1T 144 CPU to the
On 09/18/2017 08:17 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
[snip]
I don't have any specific suggestion for an additional column, other than
Berend's idea. However, I strongly advise against the use
of ENUM's. They can create a major problem in the event one needs to be
removed.
Because it will internally
On 09/15/2017 06:34 AM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[snip]
But you might consider: 1) looping around tables/indices rather than "REINDEX
DATABASE", and then setting a statement_timeout=9s for each REINDEX statement;
Is there a way to do that within psql? (Doing it from bash is trivial, but
I'd
On 09/07/2017 09:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> writes:
On 09/07/2017 09:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Manual cleanup shouldn't be very hard, fortunately. Run pg_controldata
to see where the last checkpoint is, and delete WAL files whose names
indicate they are
On 09/12/2017 01:45 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
Hi all
I am using 9.4.4 on Fedora 22.
I am experimenting with optimising a SQL statement. One version uses 4
LEFT JOIN’s and a 5-way CASE statement in the body. The second moves the
filtering into the JOIN section, and I end up with 16 LEFT JOIN’s
Hi,
v 9.2.7
Based on LENGTH(offending_column), none of the values are more than 144
bytes in this 44.2M row table. Even though VARCHAR is, by definition,
variable length, are there any internal design issues which would make
things more efficient if it were dropped to, for example,
On 09/07/2017 05:07 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Manual cleanup shouldn't be very hard, fortunately. Run pg_controldata
to see where the last checkpoint is, and delete WAL files whose names
indicate they are before that (but
On 09/07/2017 09:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net> writes:
After disabling log shipping via setting "archive_mode = off", and then
running, "pg_ctl reload", old WAL files and their associated .ready files
aren't being deleted.
Hmm. I migh
Hi,
v8.4 (and there's nothing I can do about it).
After disabling log shipping via setting "archive_mode = off", and then
running, "pg_ctl reload", old WAL files and their associated .ready files
aren't being deleted.
Is there any document you can point me to as to why this is happening,
On 08/30/2017 08:48 AM, Scott Mead wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Ron Johnson <ron.l.john...@cox.net
<mailto:ron.l.john...@cox.net>> wrote:
Hi,
For any of you with those failover clusters, do you know if "pg_ctl
reload" works (for compatib
Hi,
For any of you with those failover clusters, do you know if "pg_ctl reload"
works (for compatible config file changes), or must we bounce the database
using "hares -offline" then "hares -online"?
Thanks
--
World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing
On 08/28/2017 08:22 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Christoph Moench-Tegeder (c...@burggraben.net) wrote:
## Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net):
How is this done in v8.4? (I tried adding "date; rsync ..." but pg
didn't like that *at all*.)
There's a DEBUG1-level log message on
On 08/28/2017 06:06 AM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net):
How is this done in v8.4? (I tried adding "date; rsync ..." but pg
didn't like that *at all*.)
There's a DEBUG1-level log message on successful archive_command
completion - that woul
Hi,
How is this done in v8.4? (I tried adding "date; rsync ..." but pg didn't
like that *at all*.)
Thanks
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 08/27/2017 02:23 PM, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net):
Everything I've read says that you should use "rsync -a". Is there
any reason why we can't/shouldn't use "rsync -az" so as to reduce
transfer time?
On today's LANs,
Hi,
(Yes, its old. Nothing I can do about that.)
Everything I've read says that you should use "rsync -a". Is there any
reason why we can't/shouldn't use "rsync -az" so as to reduce transfer time?
Also, does that change require a full restart (difficult with production
systems)?
Thanks
On 08/22/2017 02:55 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 08/22/2017 12:48 PM, rakeshkumar464 wrote:
We have a requirement to encrypt the entire database. What is the best tool
to accomplish this. Our primary goal is that it should be transparent to the
application, with no change in the application,
On 08/11/2017 02:35 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 8/11/17 10:15, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
some time whe have 2 process postgres for 1 instance like this
exppgs*17769* 1 0 01:06 ?00:01:04
/usr/pgsql-9.3/bin/postgres -D /bases/postgresql/scl/data -i -p 5450 -h
quietness.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHVNgCS9HxQb37XmcRArgLAKCqTxy49KKaRy3P2UUqEyy6LJJKHACg0RDm
8TeEugJQYEGwyJ3nZBUWc9I=
=LBD2
-END PGP SIGNATURE
should see my Russian!!!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHUvf5S9HxQb37XmcRApraAKDlKLorRwSSuqVe66cUBbmPdaJXrQCgsLa0
589HllNDuKk8ImByzPAtJBE=
=ZH4M
-END PGP SIGNATURE
( id, datetime, some_data)
This should help you to decide how to design your tables. 3NF is as
far as you really need to go.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_normalization
http://pubs.logicalexpressions.com/Pub0009/LPMArticle.asp?ID=88
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my
whenever
you add a new user.
Cluster by *range* of user ids, and preallocate some number of
tablespaces.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHU0tsS9HxQb37XmcRAhPoAJsESJL/Zs
.)
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHUh9nS9HxQb37XmcRAjPTAJ4jRUZUaF+j2KAB3+lBY6A3ROfynACfawWT
0QN026Ncl/Iag2M6E1kfjUg=
=RlXy
-END PGP SIGNATURE
more expensive than on Unix (given
that win32 is optimized towards context switching between threads). NTFS
Isn't that why Apache2 has separate thread mode and 1.x-style
pre-forked mode?
isn't optimized for having 100+ processes reading and writing to the
same file. Probably others..
- --
Ron
you want to do with just SQL.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTaTaS9HxQb37XmcRAiaWAJ9/BiarNsC9UUNyreg8LiIq9+mUKwCeNS/L
1y4DkS4vJbJd15ZbPuwalac=
=QZG7
-END PGP SIGNATURE
different disk layouts than the original database.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTgd3S9HxQb37XmcRAs5kAKCSuOLOguqhpf/DT0OxbA6ew33CWQCfaVf1
KBzM2RxA91WQEa7MM02SKZg=
=lvNg
Turns out that there was/is a bug in glibc's malloc(). Don't know
if it's been fixed yet.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
programmers still haven't quite
figured out what it's good for.
Even AfterStep is written is plain C...
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTMqjS9HxQb37XmcRAmS
.
Wasn't there a time (2 years ago?) when PG ran pretty dog-like on SPARC?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHTMzQS9HxQb37XmcRAo91AJ0d1l1LW0REaUEyVwrkhAF7u6+EYgCaA1aG
in.)
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHSzxlS9HxQb37XmcRAh0QAKCLp5aNkoPPs8P5oXQCJ0HI28MNuACeKtFH
eECn8XRwrjOqonUuDr8DDH8=
=cYiG
-END PGP SIGNATURE
On Nov 24, 2007 12:06 PM, Steve Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/24/07 09:12, Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Nov 24, 2007 5:09 AM
drives for RAID 1. You don't mention what OS you'll use,
but if you really need cheap then XP Linux do sw RAID, and FreeBSD
probably does too.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
. ie use
car number plates rather than some serial int.
I wouldn't trust plate number to be unique over time, since the
format ABC 123 only has a capacity of 17,576,000 vehicles.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/07 01:21, Gregory Stark wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/16/07 12:50, João Paulo Zavanela wrote:
Hello,
How many fields is recomended to create a primary key?
I'm thinking to create one with 6 fields, is much
column.
Fie on you evil synthetic key lovers. Long live the Natural Key!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPel7S9HxQb37XmcRAmPZAJ9mml45XtPRSCrAiQ7K+LCwWf5J5QCgvaSp
or 6 or 24. Doesn't matter.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPej/S9HxQb37XmcRAo5mAJoDwp1E+aL2M/oTWhOsR5XYJi0AhgCgvUgU
/ZB7nP+K6j0WW8vNn5Q8tFI=
=s+zS
-END PGP SIGNATURE
that they can't divine all situations. So, you add a new
column to the PK and keep on going.
But still, there *are* some circumstances where natural PKs just
don't work. After all, SSNs and credit card numbers are synthetic
(just not generated sequential by the RDBMS).
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr
adhere to the law of the land, or when in
Rome, ... practice instead of kicking off fuss. And with my
mail client top-posting has no place. Let's just stick to good
old standards.
SARCASM
What ever happened to I gotta do what's right for me! and I'm OK,
you're OK?
/SARCASM
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr
PM
To: Ron Johnson
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: DB on a ramdisk (was Re: [GENERAL] Temporary, In-memory
Postgres DB?)
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/07/07 09:58, Tom Lane wrote:
Or put it on a ramdisk filesystem.
But doesn't that just add more overhead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/07 09:58, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/07/07 09:03, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
Is there such a thing as a temporary, probably in-memory, version of a
Postgres DB?
If you have enough RAM, and your database
to have stored functions and other real database
features that it just doesn't have.
If you have enough RAM, and your database is small enough, the OS
will eventually cache the whole thing.
I know that's not exactly what you're talking about, but I think
it's as close as you'll get.
- --
Ron
/docs/8.2/static/sql-altertable.html
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHMFr/S9HxQb37XmcRAuqfAKCzmYeBU4dVXorvQxBUYIoQuw9YcgCeOve1
other way for non-root users?
The whole idea of enforcing Relational Integrity in the database
engine is to *not* allow regular users to bypass data integrity
checks.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good
/interactive/sql-altertable.html
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHIbwhS9HxQb37XmcRAjg6AJ4sPW7wPH599JPVdmZ5s25b5yHnHQCeJtsr
0TRv9XcYy2
- which I can see as being worst than supporting Postgres Installs.
I think that you're just going to have to create a pilot project to
see how it fits your individual needs.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away
and loose with SQL.
IOW, the RDBMS shouldn't try to out-think me even if I seem seem to
be doing something odd.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU
is generic enough that if PG is
ever ported to the IBM 1400 that you won't have to come up with a
new acronym: DLOB (Decimal Large OBject).
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
, five, six, seven from loop_import
order by loop_id ;
fetch next From loop_set;
Wouldn't it be simpler to do:
INSERT INTO some_temp SELECT field list FROM some_table;
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes
the same
query will return the same result set over and over again regardless
of the updates to the base tables.
And is why READ COMMITTED makes your RDBMS fail part 3 (Isolation)
of the ACID test.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish
queries it is next to impossible to
tell where in app code the problem lies.
it would be very useful to get something like previous query.
Transaction analysis is the way to go here. It requires a serious
code review, though.
is adding something like this possible?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson
reports with a report writer like openrpt.
Thanks for any suggestions.
My suggestion: tell him that the SQL interface is broken.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/07 11:06, Geoffrey wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/04/07 10:28, Geoffrey wrote:
Anyone have a recommendation for a good sql tutorial? Looking for a
book, but online would be useful as well.
This is for a financial user who will need
is it to specify tablespace when creating an index?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHAnExS9HxQb37XmcRAiceAJ9vUNKVa8voo2gISHhzDgKY4OOkuQCgxuxG
. - with, as well as without, the data.
Can this task be accomplished by employing pg_dump in SQL?
If you dump with inserts, data only, then yes but it will be slow as
snot to import.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes
On 09/30/07 10:31, brian wrote:
[snip]
The default for MySQL is latin1 with swedish sorting.
Yorn desh born, der ritt de gitt der gue
Orn desh, dee born desh, de umn børk! børk! børk!
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he
is such a rabid UTF8 fan,
one wonders why his default locale setting isn't using UTF8 ...
He uses Windows?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/23/07 22:40, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 07:55 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/20/07 05:43, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
hehe.. I'll end up running it on a low-end desktop w/ 1GB ram and a
celeron 2G processor w/ ~30GB data/month.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/20/07 05:43, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 08:40 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Yes, I think that it's a bit excessive but the company can afford it so why
not... :)
Lucky SOB.
I can't get my company to spring for a dual-core 2GB
outer-join NS to C to indicate any west
African countries with missing statistics.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
something that can run java fast as well as
postgresql...
12-14 users on a Quad-core system with 4GB RAM?
Am I so old that (even accepting Tomcat and Java) that seems
excessive?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away
yes.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG8Rn3S9HxQb37XmcRAmEXAKDuh3tm+8am5Baopiwzinxh009xdgCdGgxS
5RhuTNIo88h227syqIIzfdA=
=/YEE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/07 08:32, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:59:36 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/07 07:33, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
Well, it isn't really the largest
.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG78l2S9HxQb37XmcRAjmlAJ9pHW2sDN/c2y6Rng+mzv3te+h2LgCdFZqw
QYs2/bEoaWFlMW0+priEzTs=
=i/MW
/stdev of the weekly sample size based on different
products/software mix etc.
and still be able to answer correctly, what's the average of data_1 over
the pass 2 months?
That's the purpose of data warehouses and ETL, isn't it?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish
value NOT IN TABLE;
If i have 2 processes running the same 100s of these at the same time i
end up with duplicates.
Even with isolation set to serializable
any ideas?
Unique index?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes
--
60030.824587
(1 row)
Isn't current_time already a time? Why is the cast necessary?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/15/07 19:59, Panagiwths Pediadiths wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/15/07 03:28, Panagiwths Pediadiths wrote:
Thats the fun part, I actually need to allow duplicates in specific cases
but not in this one :)
Same
necessary in 2007? A couple of MSA-1000s stuffed with 1TB
disks would hold an l-o-t *lot* of historical data.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU
2 | 1970|
2 .
Would that be considered as good table design then?
What Richard says, plus:
1. The PK of New_Design should be country_id/year.
2. You also should not store the records where value is NULL. A
left outer join would handle that.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr
proposed?
Opteron is the standard answer.
What is your backup/recovery strategy?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
need to insert, and how
evenly spread across the 24 hour day do the inserts occur?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/07 12:02, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
On 12/09/2007, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How (on average) large are the records you need to insert, and how
evenly spread across the 24 hour day do the inserts occur?
There will be around
with arrays of foreign keys, and
if so, how does one do that?
Thanks for any help.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
. There are system functions to inquire how you've set it.
Browsers already report back a mountain of client data to the web
server. I'd be stunned if FF, IE, Opera, Konq, etc don't already
expose TZ, too.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/07 15:21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
[snip]
I wouldn't trust the browser's TZ, and you would need a way to
override it.
Why?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/07 19:50, Tom Lane wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 09/10/07 15:21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
I wouldn't trust the browser's TZ, and you would need a way to
override it.
Why?
The browser may not know the setting, or may
, and there have been no noticeable ill effects, since apps
all know to adjust for TZ.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
perfectly for this query, and then runs the query
against this separate database.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/07 02:49, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 00:18 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/06/07 21:26, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
I've not arrived at any conclusion but merely
exploring my options on which way would be the best to thread. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/07 07:49, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 9/7/07, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/07 20:53, Merlin Moncure wrote:
[snip]
arrays are interesting and have some useful problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/07 01:37, Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:
Definitely a niche product.
Stonebraker's commentary was unfortunately spun by the ComputerWorld
columnist.
Tech journalist morphing reality to make a provocative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/07 09:00, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Datahouse or data warehouse?
OLTP data warehouse.
But OLTP DW are diametrically opposed in how you design,
structure, load and use them.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he
* tuples that have the extra space problem?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo