Yogesh Sharma writes:
> We are using below postgresql rpm.
> postgresql-8.1.18-2.1
As already noted, that version is *way* obsolete, and full of known bugs.
It's irresponsible to be storing data you care about in such a version.
Having said that ...
> In our system, below error is found and occu
nitiated on file system.
Thanks,
Yogesh
From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 1:24 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request to share information regarding postgresql
On 9/15/2016 12:53 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
ok, those RPM's were built and packaged by Redhat, I believe. If you
have a RHEL support contract, you should be able to get help from
them. If you don't, you really shouldn't be running RHEL as there's
no updates available without one.
wait
On 9/15/2016 12:25 AM, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
Dear John,
Thanks for your support.
Please find below name of rpm.
RPMS/postgresql-8.1.18-2.1.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/postgresql-devel-8.1.18-2.1.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/postgresql-libs-8.1.18-2.1.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/postgresql-python-8.1.18-2.1.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/postgre
> Yogesh
>
> From: pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:28 AM
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request to share information regarding po
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request to share information regarding postgresql
pg_xlog file.
On 9/14/2016 10:09 PM, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
Thanks for your support and suggestion.
We are using below postgresql rpm.
postgresql-8.1.18-2.1
thats not the full RPM name, thats just the
On 9/14/2016 10:09 PM, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
Thanks for your support and suggestion.
We are using below postgresql rpm.
postgresql-8.1.18-2.1
thats not the full RPM name, thats just the version.
8.1 has been obsolete and unsupported for about 6 years now. 8.1.18 was
released in 2009, the f
