On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 09:09:27PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sure. I think I can finish the set on Monday JST then.
So, I have been able to back-patch things down to 9.5, but further down
I am not really convinced that it is worth meddling with that,
particularly in light of 7cbee7c which
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 08:05:50AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 07/06/2018 07:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I volunteer to finish the work :)
> >
> > The 2PC patch is really simple, and fixes a data loss issue. The second
> > patch has been looked up by Heikki,
On 07/06/2018 07:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Although the state is now back to "Needs Review", I echo those
sentiments. This issue has now been hanging around for about 18
months.
No, those are my words, not Robert's :-)
For what it's worth, I volunteer to finish
Robert Haas wrote:
> Although the state is now back to "Needs Review", I echo those
> sentiments. This issue has now been hanging around for about 18
> months.
For what it's worth, I volunteer to finish the work :)
The 2PC patch is really simple, and fixes a data loss issue. The second
patch
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:39 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:35:22PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Magnus, this was your thread to begin with, though I know others have
>> been involved, any chance you'll be able to review this for commit
>> during this CF? I agree that
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:35:22PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Magnus, this was your thread to begin with, though I know others have
> been involved, any chance you'll be able to review this for commit
> during this CF? I agree that this is certainly a good thing to have
> too, though I've not
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Appears to compile and pass make check-world still (not sure why Thomas'
> bot currently thinks the build fails, since it worked here..).
It looks good now. There was a brief window when all Travis CI builds
said this
Magnus,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> >> I’ve moved this to the next CF, but since this no longer applies
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I’ve moved this to the next CF, but since this no longer applies cleanly I’ve
>> reset it to Waiting for author.
>
> Thanks Daniel for