lto:knizh...@garret.ru>> wrote:
People asked me to resubmit built-in connection pooler patch to commitfest.
Rebased version of connection pooler is attached.
Hi, hackers
Does the PostgreSQL core do not interested in the built-in connection pool? If
so, could
somebody tell me why we do not need
Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> People asked me to resubmit built-in connection pooler patch to commitfest.
> Rebased version of connection pooler is attached.
I've reviewd the patch but haven't read the entire thread thoroughly. I hope
that I don't duplicate many comments posted earlier by
Hi,
Thank you for review!
On 21.03.2021 23:59, Zhihong Yu wrote:
Hi,
+ With load-balancing policy postmaster
choose proxy with lowest load average.
+ Load average of proxy is estimated by number of clients
connection assigned to this proxy with extra weight for SSL
Use then for launching pooler worker backends and report error
Not sure I understand the above sentence. Did you mean 'them' instead of
'then' ?
Cheers
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:32 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> People asked me to resubmit built-in connection pooler patch to commitfest.
>
People asked me to resubmit built-in connection pooler patch to commitfest.
Rebased version of connection pooler is attached.
diff --git a/contrib/spi/refint.c b/contrib/spi/refint.c
index 6fbfef2b12..27aa6cba8e 100644
--- a/contrib/spi/refint.c
+++ b/contrib/spi/refint.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7
> On 17 Sep 2020, at 10:40, Konstantin Knizhnik
> wrote:
> 1. Should I myself change status from WfA to some other?
Yes, when you've addressed any issues raised and posted a new version it's very
helpful to the CFM and the community if you update the status.
> 2. Is there some way to receive
stallation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provid
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:38:02PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> Sorry, correct patch is attached.
This needs again a rebase, and has been waiting on author for 6 weeks
now, so I am switching it to RwF.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Thank your for your help.
On 05.07.2020 07:17, Jaime Casanova wrote:
You should also allow cursors without the WITH HOLD option or there is
something i'm missing?
Yes, good point.
a few questions about tainted backends:
- why the use of check_primary_key() and check_foreign_key() in
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 02:49, Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
>
> Hi, Li
>
> Thank you very much for reporting the problem.
>
> On 07.08.2019 7:21, Li Japin wrote:
> > I inspect the code, and find the following code in DefineRelation function:
> >
> > if (stmt->relation->relpersistence !=
J2EE, and odyssey. Using an external connection pooler requires additional efforts for installation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances
> On 2 Jul 2020, at 13:33, Konstantin Knizhnik
> wrote:
> On 01.07.2020 12:30, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 24 Mar 2020, at 17:24, Konstantin Knizhnik
>>> wrote:
>>> Rebased version of the patch is attached.
>> And this patch also fails to apply now, can you please submit a new version?
>>
hreaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connect
> On 24 Mar 2020, at 17:24, Konstantin Knizhnik
> wrote:
> Rebased version of the patch is attached.
And this patch also fails to apply now, can you please submit a new version?
Marking the entry as Waiting on Author in the meantime.
cheers ./daniel
pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter d
Hi Konstantin,
On 11/14/19 2:06 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
Attached please find rebased patch with this bug fixed.
This patch no longer applies: http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_27_2067.log
CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.
Regards,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
or installation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+ Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL pro
Hi
>From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru]
>>> From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru]
>>>
>>> New version of builtin connection pooler fixing handling messages of
>>> extended protocol.
>>>
>> 2. When proxy_port is a bit large (perhaps more than 2^15),
ular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architectur
Hi.
>From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru]
>
>New version of builtin connection pooler fixing handling messages of extended
>protocol.
>
Here are things I've noticed.
1. Is adding guc to postgresql.conf.sample useful for users?
2. When proxy_port is a bit large (perhaps
. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+ This chapte
oler requires additional efforts for installation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+
Travis complains that the SGML docs are broken. Please fix.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
ck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Work
ostgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+ This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connectio
some kind of connection pooling, such as
+pgbouncer, J2EE, and odyssey. Using an external connection pooler requires additional efforts for installation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+ single-threaded and so ca
so pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+ This
ncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+Built-in connection pooler spawns one or more proxy
> I attached to this mail patch which is fixing both problems: correctly
> reports error to the client and calculates number of idle clients).
>
Yes, this works much better with max_sessions=1000. Now it's handling the
300 connections on the small server. n_idle_clients now looks accurate
> First of all default value of this parameter is 1000, not 10.
Oops, my bad! Sorry about that, I'm not sure how I got that in my head
last night but I see how that would make it act strange now. I'll adjust
my notes before re-testing. :)
Thanks,
*Ryan Lambert*
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:57
Hi, Li
Thank you very much for reporting the problem.
On 07.08.2019 7:21, Li Japin wrote:
I inspect the code, and find the following code in DefineRelation function:
if (stmt->relation->relpersistence != RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP
&& stmt->oncommit != ONCOMMIT_DROP)
Hi, Konstantin
I test the patch-16 on postgresql master branch, and I find the
temporary table
cannot removed when we re-connect to it. Here is my test:
japin@ww-it:~/WwIT/postgresql/Debug/connpool$ initdb
The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "japin".
This user must
Hi Konstantin,
I did some testing with the latest patch [1] on a small local VM with 1 CPU
and 2GB RAM with the intention of exploring pg_pooler_state().
Configuration:
idle_pool_worker_timeout = 0 (default)
connection_proxies = 2
max_sessions = 10 (default)
max_connections = 1000
Initialized
uncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+ Built-in connection pooler spawns one or
ection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can a be bottleneck on high load systems, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:01:48PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
On 30.07.2019 4:02, Tomas Vondra wrote:
My idea (sorry if it wasn't too clear) was that we might handle some
cases more gracefully.
For example, if we only switch between transactions, we don't quite care
about 'SET LOCAL'
)
and at the same time tries to establish new connection.
As far as built-in connection pooler performs transaction level
scheduling, first session is grabbing backend until end of transaction.
So until this transaction is
completed backend will not be able to process some other transaction or
accept
ultiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+ This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+Built-in connection pooler spawns
completely agree with you. My original motivation of implementation
of built-in connection pooler
was to be able to preserve session semantic (prepared statements,
GUCs, temporary tables) for pooled connections.
Almost all production system have to use some kind of pooling. But in
case of using pgbouncer
have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+ Built-in connection pooler spawns one or more p
leverage it too. There are use cases that don't
work with a built-in connection pool (say, PAUSE/RESUME in pgbouncer
allows restarting the database) so projects like pgbouncer or odyssey
are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Obviously built-in connection pooler will never completely substitute
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 2:04 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> I have committed patch which emulates epoll EPOLLET flag and so should
> avoid busy loop with poll().
> I will be pleased if you can check it at FreeBSD box.
I tried your v12 patch and it gets stuck in a busy loop during make
check.
Responses inline. I just picked up this thread so please bear with me.
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 16:24, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I've started reviewing this patch and experimenting with it, so let me
> share some initial thoughts.
>
>
> 1) not handling session state (yet)
>
> I
Hi Konstantin,
I've started reviewing this patch and experimenting with it, so let me
share some initial thoughts.
1) not handling session state (yet)
I understand handling session state would mean additional complexity, so
I'm OK with not having it in v1. That being said, I think this is the
uncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting with version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+ Built-in connection pooler spawns one or more proxy
> I attached new version of the patch with fixed indentation problems and
> Win32 specific fixes.
Great, this latest patch applies cleanly to master. installcheck world
still passes.
> "connections_proxies" is used mostly to toggle connection pooling.
> Using more than 1 proxy is be needed only
ooler requires additional efforts for installation,
+configuration and maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can be bottleneck for highload system, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+S
Hello Konstantin,
> Concerning testing: I do not think that connection pooler needs some kind
of special tests.
> The idea of built-in connection pooler is that it should be able to
handle all requests normal postgres can do.
> I have added to regression tests extra path with enabled c
tionality to warrant some sort of
tests, but I don't know exactly what those would/should be.
Thank you once again for this fixes.
Updated patch is attached.
Concerning testing: I do not think that connection pooler needs some
kind of special tests.
The idea of built-in connection pooler i
Here's what I found tonight in your latest patch (9). The output from git
apply is better, fewer whitespace errors, but still getting the following.
Ubuntu 18.04 if that helps.
git apply -p1 < builtin_connection_proxy-9.patch
:79: tab in indent.
Each proxy launches its own
> I have fixed all reported issues except one related with "dropdb --force"
> discussion.
> As far as this patch is not yet committed, I can not rely on it yet.
> Certainly I can just remove this sentence from documentation, assuming
> that this patch will be committed soon.
> But then some extra
nd maintenance. Also pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can be bottleneck for highload system, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting from version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+ Thi
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for your work on this. I'll try to do more testing in the next few
days, here's what I have so far.
make installcheck-world: passed
The v8 patch [1] applies, though I get indent and whitespace errors:
:79: tab in indent.
"Each proxy launches its own
so pgbouncer (the most popular connection pooler for Postgres) is
+single-threaded and so can be bottleneck for highload system, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting from version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter de
system, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting from version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+Built-i
On 15.07.2019 1:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
Can you please explain me more precisely how to reproduce the problem
(how to configure postgres and how to connect to it)?
Maybe it's just that postmaster.c's ConnCreate() always allocates a
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> Can you please explain me more precisely how to reproduce the problem
> (how to configure postgres and how to connect to it)?
Maybe it's just that postmaster.c's ConnCreate() always allocates a
struct for port->gss if the feature is
On 14.07.2019 8:03, Thomas Munro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:30 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
Rebased version of the patch is attached.
Thanks for including nice documentation in the patch, which gives a
good overview of what's going on. I haven't read any code yet, but I
took it for
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:30 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
Rebased version of the patch is attached.
Thanks for including nice documentation in the patch, which gives a
good overview of what's going on. I haven't read any code yet, but I
took it for a quick drive to understand the user
.
+
+
+
+Starting from version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Built-in Connection Pooler Works
+
+
+Built-in connection pooler spawns one or more proxy processes whic
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:11 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> On 01.07.2019 12:57, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Interesting work. No longer applies -- please rebase.
> >
> Rebased version of the patch is attached.
> Also all this version of built-ni proxy can be found in conn_proxy
> branch of
eaded and so can be bottleneck for highload system, so multiple instances of pgbouncer have to be launched.
+
+
+
+Starting from version 12 PostgreSQL provides built-in connection pooler.
+This chapter describes architecture and usage of built-in connection pooler.
+
+
+
+ How Bu
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:33 AM Konstantin Knizhnik
wrote:
> New version of the patch (rebased + bug fixes) is attached to this mail.
Hi again Konstantin,
Interesting work. No longer applies -- please rebase.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
of worker backend).
3. Built-in proxy connection pooler: implementation proposed in
this thread.
16/1 and 16/2 specifies number of worker backends per proxy
and number of proxies, total number of backends is multiplication of
this values.
4. Yandex Odyssey (32/2 and 64/4
On 29.01.2019 8:14, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:33:06PM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
In other cases, it's important to measure and accept the possible
performance cost of running a proxy server between the client connection
and the PostgreSQL backend process. I
On 29.01.2019 0:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
The main differences with pgbouncer are that:
1. It is embedded and requires no extra steps for installation and
configurations.
2. It is not single threaded (no bottleneck)
3. It
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:33:06PM +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> In other cases, it's important to measure and accept the possible
> performance cost of running a proxy server between the client connection
> and the PostgreSQL backend process. I believe the numbers shown in the
> previous email
Hi,
Bruce Momjian writes:
> It is nice it is a smaller patch. Please remind me of the performance
> advantages of this patch.
The patch as it stands is mostly helpful in those situations:
- application server(s) start e.g. 2000 connections at start-up and
then use them depending on user
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:14:41PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> The main differences with pgbouncer are that:
>
> 1. It is embedded and requires no extra steps for installation and
> configurations.
> 2. It is not single threaded (no bottleneck)
> 3. It supports all clients (if client
Hi hacker,
I am working for some time under built-in connection pooler for Postgres:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a866346d-5582-e8e8-2492-fd32732b0783%40postgrespro.ru#b1c354d5cf937893a75954e1e77f81f5
Unlike existed external pooler, this solution supports session semantic
70 matches
Mail list logo
