On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 6:53 PM Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:20 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > On 2 Nov 2023, at 13:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > > Attached is a small patch for that: s/heapam_visibility.c/snapmgr.c/.
> >
> > No objections to the patch, the change is correct
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 10:20 PM Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2023, at 13:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Attached is a small patch for that: s/heapam_visibility.c/snapmgr.c/.
>
> No objections to the patch, the change is correct. However, with git grep and
> ctags and other ways of discove
> On 2 Nov 2023, at 13:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Attached is a small patch for that: s/heapam_visibility.c/snapmgr.c/.
No objections to the patch, the change is correct. However, with git grep and
ctags and other ways of discovery I wonder if we're not better off avoiding
such references to fi
Hi,
While working on something else, I noticed $SUBJECT: commit b7eda3e0e
moved XidInMVCCSnapshot() from tqual.c into snapmgr.c, but follow-up
commit c91560def updated this reference incorrectly:
@@ -1498,7 +1498,7 @@ GetMaxSnapshotSubxidCount(void)
* information may not be available. If we fi
