On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:09 AM Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:13 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> > The patch looks good to me as well. I will push this patch in HEAD (as
> > per option (a)) tomorrow unless I see any more suggestions/comments.
>
> The example seems to demonstrate the
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:13 AM Amit Kapila wrote:
> The patch looks good to me as well. I will push this patch in HEAD (as
> per option (a)) tomorrow unless I see any more suggestions/comments.
The example seems to demonstrate the point quite well but one thing
that I notice is that it is quite
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:43 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 4:49 PM Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This patch looks mostly good to me except for a few minor comments
> > > which are mentioned below. It is not very clear in which branch(es) we
> > > should commit
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 4:49 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:18 PM Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:07 AM Peter Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your review comments. Those reported mistakes are fixed
> > > in the attached patch v3.
> > >
> >
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 2:18 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:07 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> >
> > Thank you for your review comments. Those reported mistakes are fixed
> > in the attached patch v3.
> >
>
> This patch looks mostly good to me except for a few minor comments
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:07 AM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> Thank you for your review comments. Those reported mistakes are fixed
> in the attached patch v3.
>
This patch looks mostly good to me except for a few minor comments
which are mentioned below. It is not very clear in which branch(es) we
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:05 PM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com
wrote:
>
...
> Thanks for updating the patch. Two comments:
>
> 1.
> + it means the copied table t3 contains all rows even
> when
> + they do not patch the row filter of publication
> pub3b.
>
> Typo. I think "they do not patch the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 3:36 PM Peter Smith wrote:
>
> PSA v2 of the patch, based on all feedback received.
>
> ~~~
>
> Main differences from v1:
>
> * Rewording and more explanatory text.
>
> * The examples were moved to the "Subscription" [1] page and also
> extended to show some normal
PSA v2 of the patch, based on all feedback received.
~~~
Main differences from v1:
* Rewording and more explanatory text.
* The examples were moved to the "Subscription" [1] page and also
extended to show some normal replication and row filter examples, from
[Amit].
* Added some text to
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 12:10 PM Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:08 PM Euler Taveira wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, at 1:10 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > The logical replication tablesync ignores the publication 'publish'
> > operations during the initial data copy.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 7:08 PM Euler Taveira wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, at 1:10 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> The logical replication tablesync ignores the publication 'publish'
> operations during the initial data copy.
>
> This is current/known PG behaviour (e.g. as recently mentioned [1])
>
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022, at 1:10 AM, Peter Smith wrote:
> The logical replication tablesync ignores the publication 'publish'
> operations during the initial data copy.
>
> This is current/known PG behaviour (e.g. as recently mentioned [1])
> but it was not documented anywhere.
initial data
12 matches
Mail list logo
