On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 05:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pushed with mostly-cosmetic adjustments.
Thanks for pushing this.
> I noticed a couple of loose ends that are somewhat outside the scope
> of the bug report, but maybe are worth considering now:
>
> 1. There's some inconsistency in the wording of
David Rowley writes:
> [ drop_func_if_not_exists_fix_v9.patch ]
Pushed with mostly-cosmetic adjustments.
I noticed a couple of loose ends that are somewhat outside the scope
of the bug report, but maybe are worth considering now:
1. There's some inconsistency in the wording of the error
Thanks for reviewing this.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 04:31, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I propose maybe more strongly comment fact so noError is applied only on "not
> found" event. In other cases, this flag is ignored and error is raised
> immediately there. I think so it is not good enough commented
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
I read a discussion and I think so currently implemented behave (by
