At Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in <20180328013449.gc1...@paquier.xyz>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:06:23AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
> > peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:06:23AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
> peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> Committed after fixing up the documentation a bit as suggested by others.
>
> Thanks.
+1. Thanks for working on this Hari, Peter
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 3/27/18 02:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:47:41PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> >> updated patch attached with additional doc updates as per the suggestion
> >> from the
On 3/27/18 02:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:47:41PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> updated patch attached with additional doc updates as per the suggestion
>> from the upthreads.
>
> Thanks Hari for the quick update. It looks to me that this is shaped as
> suggested.
I apologize in advance that I'm not proper for wordsmithing.
At Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:24:07 -0700, "David G. Johnston"
wrote in
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Haribabu Kommi
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Haribabu Kommi
wrote:
> updated patch attached with additional doc updates as per the suggestion
> from the upthreads.
>
-
Some comments if the patch remains in-tact:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:47:41PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> updated patch attached with additional doc updates as per the suggestion
> from the upthreads.
Thanks Hari for the quick update. It looks to me that this is shaped as
suggested. Any input from other folks? I don't have more to
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:03 PM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:43:27AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> > Patch attached with the above behavior along with
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:24 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:43:27AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > Patch attached with the above behavior along with other comments from
> > upthread.
>
> Thanks for the updated version.
>
> The function changes look
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 11:43:27AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> Patch attached with the above behavior along with other comments from
> upthread.
Thanks for the updated version.
The function changes look logically good to me.
+
+ The PQhost function returns NULL when the
+
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:39:51PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > And if we are not going to change the above, then PQhost() function
> > returns 3 values,
> > - NULL when the conn==NULL
> > - Actual host or
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:39:51PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> And if we are not going to change the above, then PQhost() function
> returns 3 values,
> - NULL when the conn==NULL
> - Actual host or hostaddr of the active connection
> - Empty string when the conn is not able to evaluate.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <
horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> At Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:49:22 +1100, Haribabu Kommi <
> kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote in sgsfmjgvberjh0n9w8ry24...@mail.gmail.com>
>
>
Thanks for the review.
Hello.
At Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:49:22 +1100, Haribabu Kommi
wrote in
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:28:41AM +0900,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:28:41AM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > At Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:27:09 +1100, Haribabu Kommi <
> kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote in
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:28:41AM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> At Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:27:09 +1100, Haribabu Kommi
> wrote in
At Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:27:09 +1100, Haribabu Kommi
wrote in
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:49:28AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > Here I attached the updated patch that returns either the connected
> > host/hostaddr
> > or NULL in case if the connection is not established.
> >
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 01:49:28AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> Here I attached the updated patch that returns either the connected
> host/hostaddr
> or NULL in case if the connection is not established.
>
> I removed the returning default host details, because the default host
> details are
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 3/21/18 03:40, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >>> Moreover, I wonder whether we shouldn't remove the branch where
> >>> conn->connhost is NULL. When would that be the case? The current
> >>> behavior is
On 3/21/18 03:40, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Moreover, I wonder whether we shouldn't remove the branch where
>>> conn->connhost is NULL. When would that be the case? The current
>>> behavior is to sometimes return the actual host connected to, and
>>> sometimes the host list. That doesn't make
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:33:19AM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
> peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/16/18 00:03, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>>> I agree to the conclusion that PQhost() shouldn't return hostaddr
>>> "if it has any
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 3/16/18 00:03, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > I agree to the conclusion that PQhost() shouldn't return hostaddr
> > "if it has any host name to return". But I still haven't found
> > the reason for
On 3/16/18 00:03, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> I agree to the conclusion that PQhost() shouldn't return hostaddr
> "if it has any host name to return". But I still haven't found
> the reason for returning '/tmp' for IP connection.
>
> The attached patch is revised version of that in the following
At Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:50:41 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote in
<20180316.095041.241173653.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> I drifted to come here..
>
> At Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:17:35 +0900, Michael Paquier
> wrote in
I drifted to come here..
At Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:17:35 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote
in <20180314021735.gi1...@paquier.xyz>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:42:30PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > It seems, however, that PGhost() has always been broken for hostaddr
> > use.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 04:42:30PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It seems, however, that PGhost() has always been broken for hostaddr
> use. In 9.6 (before the multiple-hosts stuff was introduced), when
> connecting to "hostaddr=127.0.0.1", PGhost() returns "/tmp". Urgh.
>
> I think we
On 1/13/18 22:19, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> While working on [1], we find out the inconsistency in PQHost() behavior
> if the connecting string that is passed to connect to the server contains
> multiple hosts with both host and hostaddr types. For example,
>
> host=host1,host2
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 02:19:26PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> > While working on [1], we find out the inconsistency in PQHost() behavior
> > if the connecting string that is passed to connect to the server
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 02:19:26PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> While working on [1], we find out the inconsistency in PQHost() behavior
> if the connecting string that is passed to connect to the server contains
> multiple hosts with both host and hostaddr types. For example,
>
>
30 matches
Mail list logo