> Do any of you have a specific wording in mind?
'Like when FPW is on …' would be okay, or '(e.g., when FPW is on …)'
would be formal?
--
Regards, Jingtang
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 12:41 PM Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for
> > hint". And indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not
> > start with 17...
> > This lis
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for
> hint". And indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not
> start with 17...
> This list is not exhaustive in any case, so I agree that formulation
> should no
Hi~
> FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for hint". And
> indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not start with 17...
Yeah, my fault. Creating index prior to v17 was also using log_newpages.
—
Regards, Jingtang
> On 10 Aug 2025, at 13:53, Jingtang Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi hackers~
>
> I find the specification of wal_compression in our docs a little bit confusing
> for it 'compress full page images when FPW is on or during a base backup',
> which was true before v17. Since v17, we will also use full page
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 6:53 PM Jingtang Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi hackers~
>
> I find the specification of wal_compression in our docs a little bit confusing
> for it 'compress full page images when FPW is on or during a base backup',
> which was true before v17. Since v17, we will also use full p
