2018-06-20 7:44 GMT+02:00 Amit Langote :
> On 2018/06/02 0:15, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > I think we should at least display "Type" as "partitioned table" for a
> > partitioned table, so that it's easy to understand why the size is 0;
> > partitioned tables do not hold any data by themselves.
>
>
On 2018/06/02 0:15, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I think we should at least display "Type" as "partitioned table" for a
> partitioned table, so that it's easy to understand why the size is 0;
> partitioned tables do not hold any data by themselves.
There was a long discussion last year (during PG 10
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Pavel Stehule
wrote:
>
>
> 2018-06-01 17:15 GMT+02:00 Ashutosh Bapat >:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule
>> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data;
>> > ┌─┐
>> > │ count │
>> > ╞═╡
>> > │ 100 │
>> >
2018-06-01 17:15 GMT+02:00 Ashutosh Bapat :
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data;
> > ┌─┐
> > │ count │
> > ╞═╡
> > │ 100 │
> > └─┘
> > (1 row)
> >
> > \dt+ can display actual size of
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> postgres=# SELECT count(*) from data;
> ┌─┐
> │ count │
> ╞═╡
> │ 100 │
> └─┘
> (1 row)
>
> \dt+ can display actual size of partitioned table data - now zero is
> displayed
>
> postgres=# \dt+ data
>
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo