On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 09:21:31PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:34:58AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Tangentially: It does seem a bit unusual to call the fact that the values
> > both
> > case-sensitive and limited to the length of a system ident
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:34:58AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> Tangentially: It does seem a bit unusual to call the fact that the values both
> case-sensitive and limited to the length of a system identifier an
> implementation detail. But if anything the length is more of one t
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:24 AM Matthias van de Meent <
boekewurm+postg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 18:12, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> >
> > Per suggestion over on -docs:
> >
> >
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bl0pr06mb4978f6c0b69f3f03aebed0fbb3...@bl0pr06mb4978.namprd0
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 18:12, David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> Per suggestion over on -docs:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/bl0pr06mb4978f6c0b69f3f03aebed0fbb3...@bl0pr06mb4978.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
I agree with moving the size of an enum into the top, but I don't
think that the label l
