dra
>
> Congratulations to all!
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> +7
Congratulations to all!
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
ed at the patch but if we get to the point of negotiating
compression please let me know.
Thanks,
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
While trying to figure out this code I found
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c;h=61588d626f608006196c769ad9807f1d3ac592e9;hb=HEAD#l913
What function should it be referring to ?
Thanks,
Dave Cramer
at HEAD is cleaner with its simplicity.
>
>
I'm unclear what this has to do with JDBC ? JDBC doesn't use OpenSSL
Alvaro ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
We are having a discussion on the jdbc project about dealing with 24:00:00.
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/992#issuecomment-354507612
Dave Cramer
On 31 July 2018 at 14:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-07-31 14:51:12 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > This patch does 2 things
> >
> > 1) Ensure that when the slot is created
> > with pg_create_physical_replication_slot if the output plugin does not
>
On 1 August 2018 at 10:13, Petr Jelinek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31/07/18 20:58, Andres Freund wrote>
> >> diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
> b/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
> >> index 3cd4eef..9f883b9 100644
> >> --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/logical.c
> >>
Since nothing else can be done we should throw an error early.
Dave Cramer
On 26 July 2018 at 16:49, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-07-26 16:40:18 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Since nothing else can be done we should throw an error early.
>
> I can't immediately think of a reason not to do that, but I personally
> don't care enough to
will
return an error instead and abort the copy connection.
Dave Cramer
0002-remove-space.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Ensure-that-pg_create_physical_replication_slot-erro.patch
Description: Binary data
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 13:54, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> Peter,
>
> I think this is all coming from Microsoft. The JDBC driver API was
>> modeled after the ODBC API, and the ODBC specification also contains the
>> {call} escape. Microsoft SQL Server is also the only SQL implementation
>> to handle
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 17:30, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 5:26 PM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, August 18, 2018, Jonathan S. Katz
> wrote:
>>
>> It’s cosmetic, but it’s a cosmetic bug: it incorrectly tells the user
>> that they
>> must be the owner of the
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 17:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer writes:
> > This is a simple fix why push back ?
>
> What was being pushed back on, I think, was the claim that this needed to
> be back-patched. I'd be inclined not to, since (a) the message is not
> wrong, on
Dave Cramer
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 18:27, Jonathan S. Katz <
jonathan.k...@excoventures.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2018, at 1:05 AM, Jonathan S. Katz <
> jonathan.k...@excoventures.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 19:35, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-17, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > The only place this is used is in aclcheck_error
> > case OBJECT_MATVIEW:
> > msg = gettext_noop("permission denied for materialized view %s");
> > break;
&g
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 18:30, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-17, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I Initially pointed out here[1] that running REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
> as a
> > no
work it would be a shame not to make it easy to use.
I also agree with David that driver writers made the best out of the
situation with functions and we are now asking for the server to dual
purpose the call command.
Is there a technical reason why this is not possible ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
the patches and attached them for consideration.
JDBC tests here
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/pgjdbc/src/test/java/org/postgresql/replication/LogicalReplicationTest.java
all pass
Regards,
Dave Cramer
0004-Add-test-for-pg_recvlogical-to-stop-replication.patch
Description: Binary data
int. Nevertheless, I predict that this is going to be an ongoing
> source of pain for a long time to come.
>
> Undoubtedly.. surely the opportunity to do something about this has not
passed as this has not been
officially released ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
e other software under Apache
> License.
>
> Certainly there is history of people using PG code for non-PostgreSQL or
at least commercial derivative work. Greenplum for example.
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
to be able to change the file name
and create a new file based on some form of template ?
Am I missing something ?
Dave Cramer
On 6 July 2018 at 14:11, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-07-06 13:49:37 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > There is some undocumented (nothing in the docs) code that allows for
> > closing reopening the output file for pg_recvlogical.
> >
> > Since this do
>
>
> On 6 July 2018 at 14:11, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-07-06 13:49:37 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> > There is some undocumented (nothing in the docs) code that allows for
>> > closing reopening the output file for pg_recvlogic
e proliferation of cloud based
implementations I can see this being a useful feature.
Regards,
Dave Cramer
tools like jq,
> reading and querying json on the command line is simple and user friendly,
> and using json for logging capture and aggregation is widely supporting and
> embraced.
>
Exactly what are you logging here ??? Why would I need to see a
multi-dimensional array in the log ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018, 9:24 AM Konstantin Knizhnik, <
k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
>
> On 19.04.2018 07:46, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:k.knizh...@postgrespro.ru]
> > Oracle, for example, you can create dedicated and non-dedicated backends.
> >> I wonder
transaction.
Is there anything else I am missing ? Does DDL get applied after the
transaction ends ?
I do find this somewhat surprising as Postgres typically requires a BEGIN
statement to start a transaction block.
Thanks
Dave Cramer
Dave Cramer
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 23:19, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:38, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Dmitry,
>>
>> Please see attached rebased patches
>>
>
> I'm fine with patch 0001, though I find this comment a bit hard to follow:
>
&g
only" instead, and people
> supported that compromise by saying "read only status is more useful than
> whether the server is standby or not," I'm afraid.
>
> The original desire should have been the ability to connect to a primary
> or a standby. So, I
>> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false, then
> >>we need to retry until we find it. To not retry forever, there
> >>should be a timeout counter parameter.
> >>
> >>
> > IIRC this is essentially what pgJDBC doe
Dave Cramer
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 07:53, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 23:19, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 19:38, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Dmitry,
>>>
>>> Please see attached reb
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 23:21, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Cramer [mailto:p...@fastcrypt.com]
> > The original desire should have been the ability to connect to a
> > primary or a standby. So, I think we should go back to th
assume that
>other nodes are standbys. done.
>
> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns false, then
>we need to retry until we find it. To not retry forever, there
>should be a timeout counter parameter.
>
>
IIRC this is essentially what pgJDBC does.
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 05:59, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> > > The problem here of course is that whoever invented
> target_session_attrs
> > > was unconcerned with following that precedent, so what we have is
> > >
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Dave Cramer [mailto:p...@fastcrypt.com]
> > >> 2) If there's no node on which pg_is_in_recovery() returns
> false,
> > then
> > >>we ne
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:15, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 18:03, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >
> >> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 01:02, Tatsuo Ishii
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
> >> >> >> But pg_is_in_recovery() returns true even for a
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:38, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> >> >> > From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp]
> >> >> >> >> But pg_is_in_recovery() returns true even for a promoting
> >> standby. So
> >> >> >> >> you have to wait and retry to send pg_is_in_recovery() until it
> >> >> >> >>
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 19:56, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> >> > I'm curious; under what circumstances would the above occur?
> >>
> >> Former primary goes down and one of standbys is promoting but it is
> >> not promoted to new primary yet.
> >>
> >
> > seems like JDBC might have some work to
Why is this being closed? I did not see the first email looking for
clarification.
The history is the original author dropped off the planet (no idea where he
is)
I can certainly rebase it.
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:00, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
Dmitry,
Thanks, I have done a preliminary check and it seems pretty straightforward.
I will clean it up for Monday
Thanks for your patience!
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:22, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:17 AM Dave Cram
ill I would say this is buggy
> because of the reason Tom said, and I agree with him.
>
Curious what client is this that is violating the protocol.
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 07:50, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Curious what client is this that is violating the protocol.
>
> I heard it was a Java program.
>
This is not surprising there are a proliferation of non-blocking
implementations,
probably approaching 10 different implementati
code is notorious for not reading warnings, I'd say no
That said I'd probably be in favour of a DEBUG mode that did warn.
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
Dmitry,
Please see attached rebased patches
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 18:52, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:49 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I have done a preliminary check and it seems pretty
> straightfo
.
>
>
And to enforce Robert's argument even further almost every pool
implementation I am aware of
has a keep alive query. So why not use the opportunity to check to see if
is a primary or standby at the same time
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
points out as being relevant to this discussion ISTM that this is
becoming a half baked "feature" that is being cobbled together instead of
being designed. Admittedly biased but I agree with Vladimir that libpq did
not implement the above feature using the same name and semantics. This
just serves to confuse the users.
Just my 2c worth
Dave Cramer
in src/test/ssl the README suggest that the Makefile can be used to
recreate the ssl directory, however there are no rules to create
*_ca.crt|key. Am I missing something ?
Dave Cramer
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 14:41, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 14/09/18 18:49, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > in src/test/ssl the README suggest that the Makefile can be used to
> > recreate the ssl directory, however there are no rules to create
> > *_ca.crt|key. Am I missing somet
r to the secondary instance, but instead allow it to process user
queries throughout the maintenance."
see this for the thread.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/VI1PR05MB5295AE43EF9525EACC9E57ECBC750%40VI1PR05MB5295.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
Andres,
Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this, rather
the original author has not replied to requests.
JDBC could use this, I assume others could as well.
That said I'm certainly open to suggestions on how to do this.
Craig, do you have any other ideas?
Dave Cramer
/SCRAM support.
>
> On Debian, stretch is on 9.4. buster has 11 packaged, and JDBC is
> shipping with SCRAM support.
>
>
Honestly what JDBC driver XYZ distro ships with is a red herring. Any
reasonably complex java program is going to use maven and pull it's
dependencies.
That said from a driver developer, I support pushing this decision off to
PG13
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Cramer writes:
> >> If someone installs a postgres RPM/DEB from postgresql.org, they could
> >> also install postgresql-jdbc, right ?
>
> > I would guess there might be some distro specific java apps th
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 16:07, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2019-Apr-08, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > > IIUC the vast majority of clients already support SCRAM auth. So the
> > > vast majority of PG users can take advantage of the additional
> security.
> > > I think
as mentioned any reasonably complex
Java app is going to ensure it has the correct versions for their app using
Maven.
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
d apparently they
> already have working patches for SCRAM.
>
We have more than patches this is already in the driver.
What do you mean by "massive-adoption exception"
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
ubtruncate
-+--+--+---+---+---+-
(0 rows)
Dave Cramer
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 01:40, Jaime Casanova
wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 08:35, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > How do I get rid of this slot ?
> >
> > select pg_drop_replication_slot('mysub');
> > ERROR: replication slot "mysub" is active for
Dave Cramer
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:30, Andres Freund
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-04 15:47:04 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 20:54, David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:49:54AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > >
Dave Cramer
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 20:54, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 10:49:54AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Is there a reason why pgoutput sends data in text format? Seems to
> > me that sending data in binary would provide a considerable
> > pe
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:46, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-04 16:39:32 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 16:30, Andres Freund <
> andres.fre...@enterprisedb.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > There's also no reason that I am aware that
Is there a reason why pgoutput sends data in text format? Seems to me that
sending data in binary would provide a considerable performance improvement.
Dave Cramer
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 18:08, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-05 00:05:02 +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > Would it make sense to work toward a binary format that's not
> > architecture-specific? I recall from COPY that our binary format is
> > not standardized across, for example, big-
example at the
> write_tuple/read_tuple/decide_datum_transfer in
>
> https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/pglogical/blob/REL2_x_STABLE/pglogical_proto_native.c
> that can help you give some ideas on how to approach this.
>
Thanks for the tip!
Dave Cramer
>
>
>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 07:21, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 07:18, Petr Jelinek
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/06/2019 00:08, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 2019-06-05 00:05:02 +0200, David Fetter
;> Álvaro
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alvaro Hernandez
>>
>>
>> ---
>> OnGres
>>
>>
I believe there is a valid reason for providing a reasonably feature
complete plugin in core. Specifically in instances such as cloud p
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 12:01, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi
>
> On June 5, 2019 8:51:10 AM PDT, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 07:21, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 07:18, Petr Jelinek
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 18:50, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-05 18:47:57 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So one of the things they would like added is to get not null information
> > in the schema record. This is so they can mark the field Optional in
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:36, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:48AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 07:49, Petr Jelinek
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 10/06/2019 13:27, Da
So back to binary output.
>From what I can tell the place to specify binary options would be in the
create publication and or in replication slots?
The challenge as I see it is that the subscriber would have to be able to
decode binary output.
Any thoughts on how to handle this? At the moment
ata in
logicalrep_read_tuple but that would require moving a lot of the logic
currently in worker.c to proto.c. This seems minimally invasive.
and thanks Petr for the tip to use pglogical for ideas.
Thanks,
Dave Cramer
>
>
0001-First-pass-at-working-code-without-subscription-opti.patch
Descriptio
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 07:49, Petr Jelinek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/2019 13:27, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So back to binary output.
> >
> > From what I can tell the place to specify binary options would be in the
> > create publication and or in replication slot
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 15:42, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:36, Tomas Vondra
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 10:35:48AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> >On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 07:49, Petr Jelinek > >
>> >
This should have gone to hackers as well
-- Forwarded message -
From: Dave Cramer
Date: Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Binary support for pgoutput plugin
To: Tomas Vondra
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 6:27 PM Tomas Vondra,
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 06:01:12PM -0
On Sat, 8 Jun 2019 at 20:09, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-08 19:41:34 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So the reason we are discussing using pgoutput plugin is because it is
> part
> > of core and guaranteed to be in cloud providers solutions.
>
>
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 07:48, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 5/23/19 10:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> "Jonathan S. Katz" writes:
> >> > For now I have left in the password based method to be scram-sha-256
> as
> >> > I am optimistic about
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 18:50, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2019-06-05 18:47:57 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So one of the things they would like added is to get not null information
> > in the schema record. This is so they can mark the field Optional in
> Java.
these
statements fail.
This seems like a rather innocuous change as the protocol is not changed,
rather the amount of information returned on startup is increased
marginally.
I've included the authors of the npgsql and the node drivers in the email
for their input.
Dave Cramer
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 14:20, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 01:46:47PM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 12:50, Tomas Vondra
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 10:26:47PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> >> >On Sun
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 12:50, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 10:26:47PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 1:25 PM Peter Eisentraut
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2019-04-12 19:52, Robert Treat wrote:
> >> > It is clear to me that the docs are wrong, but I don't see
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 15:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:29 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So if I understand this correctly if user bob has altered his search
> path and there is a security-definer function called owned by him then
> > the search pa
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 09:11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:32 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > So did this die from lack of interest?
> >
> > I have proposed in another thread adding more GUC REPORT variables, but
> I see this as a much better way.
>
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 10:06, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:23 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > See attached for an initial patch. If this is an acceptable way to go I
> will add tests and documentation
>
> And clean up the code? Doesn't look crazy on a quick glan
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 16:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:59 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> >> I'm still a bit conflicted about what to do with search_path as I do
> believe this is potentially a security issue.
> >> It may be
t
> > the list to see if a newly-defined variable should be marked GUC_REPORT.
>
This suggests creating a list in guc.c instead. I'm unclear as to the
visibility of variables in there
How do I make this list visible only to the session ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
>
>
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 16:22, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:59 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > I'm still a bit conflicted about what to do with search_path as I do
> believe this is potentially a security issue.
> > It may be that we always want to report that and p
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 14:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > Dave Cramer wrote:
> > test=> BEGIN;
> > BEGIN
> > test=> CALL testproc();
> > ERROR: invalid transaction termination
> > CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function testproc()
? I realize
oids are not guaranteed to be unique, but this seems to be quite a
coincidence.
Dave Cramer
Responses inline. I just picked up this thread so please bear with me.
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 16:24, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> I've started reviewing this patch and experimenting with it, so let me
> share some initial thoughts.
>
>
> 1) not handling session state (yet)
>
> I
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 06:40, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:19 PM David Steele wrote:
> > On 2/16/19 10:38 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > Thanks for looking at this. FYI, I did not originally write this,
> rather
> > > the original author has not r
there was a proposal to make reportable GUC's configurable here
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmobsxsy0kfr_vdqqoxjxqafnesfxf_-darne+qhhqcw...@mail.gmail.com
I don't really care which one gets implemented, although I think the latter
makes more sense.
Dave Cramer
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 08:05, Shay
T variables, but I
see this as a much better way.
I'm willing to code the patch if we can get some buy in here ?
Dave Cramer
da...@postgresintl.com
www.postgresintl.com
On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 11:20, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 07:16:10AM -0500, Dave Cramer wrote:
> >
> > See attached
>
> --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/worker.c
> +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 12:04, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2019-Nov-11, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Previously someone mentioned that we need to confirm whether the two
> > servers are compatible for binary or not.
> >
> > Checking to make sure the two servers have th
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 12:07, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 12:04, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
>
>> On 2019-Nov-11, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>> > Previously someone mentioned that we need to confirm whether the two
>> > servers are com
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 15:17, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> On 2019-Nov-11, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Following 2 patches address Dmitry's concern and check for compatibility.
>
> Please resend the whole patchset, so that the patch tester can verify
> the series. (Doing
On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 at 11:00, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:29:26AM -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > Which is what I have done. Thanks
> > >
> > > I've attached both patches for comments.
> > > I sti
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 21:47, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:03 AM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Ok, I've rebased and reverted logicalrep_read_insert
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> From the code style police (actually just from cfbot, which is set up
> to complain about decla
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 19:40, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:49 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Here's an updated patch that addresses some of Andres' concerns
> specifically does not use strtok.
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I think you need to s/strncasecmp/pg_strncas
While following an old link to
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/auth-methods.html
I see a list of links to authentication methods. However:
When I hit the current version
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/auth-methods.html
There are absolutely no links...
Dave Cramer
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 06:53, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:43 PM Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> While following an old link to
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/auth-methods.html
>>
>> I see a list of links to authentication methods. However
1 - 100 of 381 matches
Mail list logo
