On 8/27/19 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tom Turelinckx" writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I think this is the problem:
>>> 'scmrepo' => '/home/pgbf/pgmirror.git',
>>> Probably this isn't updated often enough. It probably has little to do with
>>> the clock
"Tom Turelinckx" writes:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I think this is the problem:
>> 'scmrepo' => '/home/pgbf/pgmirror.git',
>> Probably this isn't updated often enough. It probably has little to do with
>> the clock settings.
> The configuration is
On 8/27/19 8:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 8/27/19 4:33 AM, Tom Turelinckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I think this is the problem:
>>>
>>> 'scmrepo' => '/home/pgbf/pgmirror.git',
>>>
>>> Probably this isn't updated often enough. It probably has
On 8/27/19 4:33 AM, Tom Turelinckx wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I think this is the problem:
>>
>> 'scmrepo' => '/home/pgbf/pgmirror.git',
>>
>> Probably this isn't updated often enough. It probably has little to do with
>> the clock settings.
>>
>> This
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think this is the problem:
>
> 'scmrepo' => '/home/pgbf/pgmirror.git',
>
> Probably this isn't updated often enough. It probably has little to do with
> the clock settings.
>
> This is the kind of old-fashioned way of doing things.
On 8/26/19 2:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 8/21/19 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
Still, if we simply added the skew to the snapshot time that might be
enough to achieve what you want. That would be a one line change, I think.
>>> +1
>>
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 8/21/19 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> Still, if we simply added the skew to the snapshot time that might be
>>> enough to achieve what you want. That would be a one line change, I think.
>> +1
> Done. It's only happening prospectively, so
On 8/21/19 10:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> The Javscript could also be made to update the "ago" part every minute,
>> and show the absoulte time as a tooltip, which is what pretty much every
>> other website does.
>>
>
> The code for the page is here:
>
On 8/21/19 4:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> What I have done quickly is to store a measure of the clock skew. We
>> already calculated it but we didn't store it. Initial indications are
>> that only a few have significant skew.
> Oh, I didn't know that the server had the
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> What I have done quickly is to store a measure of the clock skew. We
> already calculated it but we didn't store it. Initial indications are
> that only a few have significant skew.
Oh, I didn't know that the server had the ability to measure that.
(Yes, I agree that
On 8/21/19 11:07 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 8/21/19 9:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The real problem with that column though is that it relies on run start
>> times that are self-reported by the buildfarm clients, and some of them
>> have system clocks that are many hours off reality. What
On 8/21/19 3:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I find the time displays like
>
> 01:03 ago
>
> on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
>
> First, I can never tell whether this is hours-minutes or minutes-seconds
> -- there is probably a less ambiguous format available.
This is
On 8/21/19 9:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> The real problem with that column though is that it relies on run start
> times that are self-reported by the buildfarm clients, and some of them
> have system clocks that are many hours off reality. What *I'd* like to
> see is for the column to contain
On 8/21/19 8:32 AM, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Peter Eisentraut <
>> peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I find the time displays like
>>>
>>> 01:03 ago
>>>
>>> on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
>>>
>>>
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Peter Eisentraut <
> peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I find the time displays like
>> 01:03 ago
>> on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
>>
>> I notice that the page source actually includes absolute times that are
>> then
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Peter Eisentraut <
> peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>> I find the time displays like
>>
>> 01:03 ago
>>
>> on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
>>
>> First, I can never tell whether this is hours-minutes or
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I find the time displays like
>
> 01:03 ago
>
> on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
>
> First, I can never tell whether this is hours-minutes or minutes-seconds
> -- there is probably a less
I find the time displays like
01:03 ago
on the buildfarm status page unhelpful.
First, I can never tell whether this is hours-minutes or minutes-seconds
-- there is probably a less ambiguous format available.
But more importantly, the page doesn't say when it was generated, so a
relative
18 matches
Mail list logo
