Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-05-24 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Pavel Raiskup 2018-05-24 <101829257.nn0xsvv...@nb.usersys.redhat.com> > > Interesting, thanks. How this is implemented? What you mean by "newer > > library" -- new soname, or just a newer package build (without any other > > change) e.g.? > > I've already done some observation how libraries

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-05-24 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 2:23:24 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Thanks Stephen, > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:13:08 PM CEST Stephen Frost wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > * Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:41:40 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > >

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-05-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Thanks Stephen, On Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:13:08 PM CEST Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:41:40 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > On Monday, April 9, 2018 11:04:33 PM CEST Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Stephen Frost

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-05-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Thursday, May 10, 2018 12:41:40 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, April 9, 2018 11:04:33 PM CEST Tom Lane wrote: > > Stephen Frost writes: > > > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > >> On 4/5/18 02:04, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > >>> As a

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-05-10 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Monday, April 9, 2018 11:04:33 PM CEST Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost writes: > > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > >> On 4/5/18 02:04, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >>> As a followup thought; there are probably two major obstacles ATM > >>> - the

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-04-09 Thread Tom Lane
Stephen Frost writes: > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On 4/5/18 02:04, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >>> As a followup thought; there are probably two major obstacles ATM >>> - the DSOs' symbols are not yet versioned, and >>> - the build-system doesn't

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-04-09 Thread Stephen Frost
Greetings, * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 4/5/18 02:04, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello, for the support of multiple versions of PostgreSQL RPM packages on > > one system, we are thinking about having only one libpq.so.5 > > (libecpg.so.6, libpgtype.so.3

Re: Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-04-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 4/5/18 02:04, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hello, for the support of multiple versions of PostgreSQL RPM packages on > one system, we are thinking about having only one libpq.so.5 > (libecpg.so.6, libpgtype.so.3 respectively) supported and about building > (linking) all the PostgreSQL package

Shared PostgreSQL libraries and symbol versioning

2018-04-05 Thread Pavel Raiskup
Hello, for the support of multiple versions of PostgreSQL RPM packages on one system, we are thinking about having only one libpq.so.5 (libecpg.so.6, libpgtype.so.3 respectively) supported and about building (linking) all the PostgreSQL package versions against that. The pattern would mean that