Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I can initdb --- that seems fine --- but the regression tests spew
lots of small fragments. What
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote:
> My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I actively
> run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0, incidentally;
> there is no minor version).
Have you tried mach? http://thomas.apestaart.org/projects/ma
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:39:49 +0900 Kiyoshi Sawada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> $ nslookup localhost
> Server: name.server.mydomain
> Address: xxx.xx.xx.xxx
> : : :
> (failed test)
> Is it necessary to start a DNS server to bind 'localhost' in Kiyoshi's machine?
>
I got bind-9.2.2-sol8-intel-
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
> The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
> The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x ...
or is this some other issue?
---(end of
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:57 am, Robert Treat wrote:
> I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
> one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
> assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
> rolls around. However
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
> Meanwhile we seem to be in a situation where PostgreSQL is rather
> competing against Oracle than against MySQL. In our case there are more
> people asking for Oracle -> Pg migration than for MySQL -> Pg. MySQL
> does not seem to be the great enemy because most peopl
Robert E. Bruccoleri wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have compiled and tested Postgresql-7.4beta4 on SGI Irix
> 6.5.20 using the MIPS Pro 7.4 compilers and on SGI Altix using the gcc
> 2.96 compilers and both ports passed all tests within the limits of
> numerical accuracy.
> What is the URL for
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I did "make distclean", full rebuild, initdb on both HP and Linux
machines. The HP passes both serial and parallel regression tests.
The Linux machine initdb's, and simple manual queries seem to wor
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
> kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
FWIW, I can initdb --- that seems fine --- but the regression tests spew
lots of small fragments. What I suspect
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's strange, if I reverse apply my patch I have buffer leak's and all
> kinds of crap. Can't even initdb. Who else applied patches tonight?
Well, there was my operator-class patch (which went nowhere near the
buffer stuff) and also the initdb-in-C code (
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:46:52 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's always a good idea to put localhost into dns too.
>
> Yeah, but "localhost" *is* resolving as something on Kiyoshi's
> machine, else a different error message would have appe
Jan Wieck wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
Oh ... hmmm ... will check
That's strang
Tom Lane wrote:
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
Oh ... hmmm ... will check
Jan
--
#=
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
I'm seeing a whole bunch of regression test failures that weren't there
half an hour ago ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)
I have just committed the implementation of ARC into the 7.5devel tree.
This doesn't contain the vacuum page delay, or the test implementation
of the background writer based on the checkpoint process. These two need
some more discussion and bouncing around.
Jan
--
#
I wrote:
> What if we attack the problem head on --- make indexes able to handle
> cross-datatype comparison operators directly? That would solve the
> problem without *any* semantic side-effects. AFAIR we've never seriously
> considered doing that; I guess anyone who thought of it dismissed it a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Hans-J?rgen Sch?nig wrote:
> an inferior product anyway. What I want to point out is that some people
> want an alternative Oracle's Real Application Cluster. They want load
> balancing and hot failover. Even data centers asking for replication did
> no
Jordan Henderson wrote:
Jan,
I am wondering if you are familar with the work covered in 'Recovery in
Parallel Database Systems' by Svein-Olaf Hvasshovd (Vieweg) ? The book is an
excellent detailed description covering high availablility DB
implementations.
No, but it sounds like something I al
Jan,
This is EXACTLY what we have been waiting for (years) :) :) :).
If you need somebody for testing or documentation just drop me a line.
Cheers,
Hans
Jan Wieck wrote:
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Jan,
First of all we really appreciate that this is going to be an Open
Source project.
The
Jan Wieck wrote:
Dear community,
for some reason the post I sent yesterday night still did not show up on
the mailing lists. I have set up some links on the developers side under
http://developer.postgresql.org/~wieck/slony1.html
The concept will be the base for some of my work as a Software En
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's always a good idea to put localhost into dns too.
Yeah, but "localhost" *is* resolving as something on Kiyoshi's
machine, else a different error message would have appeared.
I'm wondering just what it resolved to though --- maybe we should
have made
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:32:38AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are we using an api that only returns nslookup responses and not
> > /etc/hosts entries ? At least on AIX it looks like it.
>
> We use getaddrinfo(), or if that doesn't exist get
Jan,
I am wondering if you are familar with the work covered in 'Recovery in
Parallel Database Systems' by Svein-Olaf Hvasshovd (Vieweg) ? The book is an
excellent detailed description covering high availablility DB
implementations.
I think your right on by not thinking smaller!!
Jordan Hende
Dear All,
I have compiled and tested Postgresql-7.4beta4 on SGI Irix
6.5.20 using the MIPS Pro 7.4 compilers and on SGI Altix using the gcc
2.96 compilers and both ports passed all tests within the limits of
numerical accuracy.
What is the URL for reporting successful ports? --Bob
I wrote:
I just spent 15 minutes searching on the RH web site trying to locate
a complete list of packages in the various RHEL personalities, with
conspicuous lack of success. How anyone can make decisions about it
without knowing exactly what is in it is beyond me.
However, you can see a lis
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 10:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
> > plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
>
> I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly f
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and MyS
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
Jan,
First of all we really appreciate that this is going to be an Open
Source project.
There is something I wanted to add from a marketing point of view: I
have done many public talks in the 2 years or so. There is one question
people keep asking me: "How about the
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are we using an api that only returns nslookup responses and not
> /etc/hosts entries ? At least on AIX it looks like it.
We use getaddrinfo(), or if that doesn't exist gethostbyname().
If there's a problem of that ilk then it's those libra
> > LOG: could not bind socket for statistics collector: Cannot assign requested
> > address
>
> Hmm ... that's sure the problem, but what can we do about it? ISTM that
> any non-broken system ought to be able to resolve "localhost". Actually
> it's worse than that: your system resolved "local
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also (and maybe someone from Red Hat can weigh in here) are there any
> plans from Red Hat to release RHEL rpms for postgresql in the future,
I can tell you that Red Hat is getting beat up regularly for having
omitted Postgres (and MySQL!) from RHEL 3. I
Austin Gonyou wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Austin Gonyou wrote:
> What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
> 7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a
I haven't seen any discussion on the topic, so thought I might start
one. We currently provide rpms for Red Hat 7.x, 8.x, and 9, and I'm
assuming that we'll have rpms for all of those for 7.4 once release time
rolls around. However, given that Red Hat is dropping support for 7.x
and 8.x version on
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:51:31PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Patrick Welche writes:
>
> > PostgreSQL 7.5devel on arm-unknown-netbsdelf1.6ZE, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
> > 3.3.2-nb1
>
> Can you test 7.4?
Several days of compiling later..
All 93 tests passed.
with 7.4rc2 on NetBSD-1.6Z
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pg_dump can be selective but I don't think it can be incremental.
>
> I hope I got your point correctly.
I think he's really talking about PITR, which will not be in 7.4.
-Doug
---(end of broadcast)--
Austin Gonyou wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a lo
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 01:00, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Austin Gonyou wrote:
>
> > What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
> > 7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
>
> pg_dump?
>
> Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a long
> I have a problem with compile PostgreSQL from cvs with tag
> REL7_4_STABLE
> Error is 'ECPG_ARRAY_NONE is not declared' (in execute.c)
My fault. extern.h wasn't committed and I didn't notice. Sorry.
It should be fixed now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 1791
Austin Gonyou wrote:
What facilities are/will be available for hot(online) backups with the
7.4 release? PITR, something else? TIA.
pg_dump?
Did you mean hot failover or hot backup? Postgresql does hot backup for a long time.
Bye
Shridhar
---(end of broadcast)-
39 matches
Mail list logo
