Re: [HACKERS] hot standby system

2006-07-22 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2006-07-21 kell 20:00, kirjutas Chris Campbell: The documentation [1] says this about On-line backup and point-in- time recovery: If we continuously feed the series of WAL files to another machine that has been loaded with the same base backup file, we have a hot

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Robert Lor
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Here is a consolidated patch that contains all the files. I made some configure and makefile adjustments and put standard comment headers in all the files. You can use DTRACEFLAGS to pass options to configure, which should help sorting out the 32/64-bit issue. The

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Robert Lor wrote: I can't seem to apply the patch on Solaris. Perhaps the attached patch in -c format will work better. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ diff -cNr ../cvs-pgsql/configure ./configure *** ../cvs-pgsql/configure 2006-07-21 23:35:48.0 +0200 ---

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Robert Lor
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Perhaps the attached patch in -c format will work better. Now I'm getting a different type of error. After running the patch command, the configure file is partially patched but not the others. Attached is configure.rej. I just checked out the source from CVS.

[HACKERS] Documenting Replication Solutions

2006-07-22 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hi, at the code sprint, we agreed to put together some documentation about current and upcoming replication solutions for PostgreSQL. Is somebody already working on that? For Postgres-R, you can find some information on www.postgres-r.org. And I've just opened a project on pgFoundry. This

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Robert Lor wrote: Now I'm getting a different type of error. After running the patch command, the configure file is partially patched but not the others. Attached is configure.rej. I just checked out the source from CVS. Sorry, there must be something wrong with your source code or patch

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Robert Lor
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Robert Lor wrote: Now I'm getting a different type of error. After running the patch command, the configure file is partially patched but not the others. Attached is configure.rej. I just checked out the source from CVS. Sorry, there must be something wrong

Re: [HACKERS] Documenting Replication Solutions

2006-07-22 Thread Christopher Browne
Quoth Markus Schiltknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]: at the code sprint, we agreed to put together some documentation about current and upcoming replication solutions for PostgreSQL. Is somebody already working on that? I don't recall that anyone expressly agreed to do so; I'll see if I can, this

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

2006-07-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Here is a consolidated patch that contains all the files. I made some configure and makefile adjustments and put standard comment headers in all the files. You can use DTRACEFLAGS to pass options to configure, which should help sorting out the 32/64-bit issue. The problem of the *.d files