Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Warren Turkal
On Sunday 25 February 2007 23:23, Tom Lane wrote: > It was mentioned upthread that Josh has seen repeated problems with his > conversions. I am manually inspecting the diff between CVS tag REL_8_1_0 and SVN tag tags/REL_8_1_0/pgsql, and I am not finding any differences in code short of the $Id$-

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Warren Turkal
On Sunday 25 February 2007 23:23, Tom Lane wrote: > It was mentioned upthread that Josh has seen repeated problems with his > conversions.  I too would like to see some details about that.  One > thing that I personally would find to be a showstopper for any proposed > switch is if it fails to main

Re: [HACKERS] PGSQL and NPGSQL does not display exact errors

2007-02-25 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi. Um, I think it is difficult for those messages to be standardized...Certainly different each DBMS expression makes the user often puzzled. Then, As for each DBMS, the history of evolution was different. That is, they were not able to share architecture. Please see the following message.

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Tom Lane
Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 24 February 2007 23:11, Tom Lane wrote: >> I also tend to think that a conversion will be easier in a year or two >> than it is today --- the problems noted upthread are certainly a >> heads-up that cvs2svn is not yet as robust as one could wi

Re: [HACKERS] PGSQL and NPGSQL does not display exact errors

2007-02-25 Thread Joshua D. Drake
RPK wrote: > PGSQL and NPGSQL does not display exact error while using with VB.NET. We > faced a lot of trouble to find out actually where an error occured. > > For example in a routine we need to insert a record to the table. I forgot > to use "values" clause in the Insert Query, but PGSQL displa

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Warren Turkal
On Saturday 24 February 2007 23:11, Tom Lane wrote: > I also tend to think that a conversion will be easier in a year or two > than it is today --- the problems noted upthread are certainly a > heads-up that cvs2svn is not yet as robust as one could wish. Cvs2svn seems to make as much sense of CVS

Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:06:57PM -0500 I heard the voice of Neil Conway, and lo! it spake thus: > > The ability to do history-sensitive merges actually results in a > significant reduction in the need for manual conflict resolution. I would say that a far greater contributor in practice would s

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:28:20PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: > > I don't really drink this koolaid, at least not to the extent of > disavowing what I said above. Oh, don't take my message as "You're wrong, you're not taking into account [...]". It was mean

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Neil Conway
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 14:49 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > For example, currently if I have a patch and somebody reviews it and > opines that I have to change foo to bar; then I resubmit the patch. How > do they find out whether I actually changed foo to bar? Currently there > are two alternative

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:27:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: This decision really belongs to the handful of people who do most of the maintenance and live with most of any CVS pain that exists: such as Tom, Bruce, Peter, Neil,

Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Neil Conway
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 18:02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yah know, the one bit of these pitches that always sounds like pure > snake oil is the claim that they offer some kind of mechanical solution > to merge conflicts. AFAICS that has nothing to do with the SCMS in use > and everything to do with wh

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:27:38PM -0500 I heard the voice of Andrew Dunstan, and lo! it spake thus: > > This decision really belongs to the handful of people who do most of > the maintenance and live with most of any CVS pain that exists: such > as Tom, Bruce, Peter, Neil, Alvaro. Othe people hav

Re: [HACKERS] error in cvs head: bogus varattno for OUTER var: 5

2007-02-25 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote: >> This looks pretty nearly related to stuff I've been hacking on recently, >> so I suppose I broke something :-(. Will take a closer look tomorrow. > This should help. I managed to whiddle the example down even furt

Re: [HACKERS] help required regarding queryin postgis database from google maps

2007-02-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Phani Kishore wrote: hi ! i think u people could probably help me i how to query the pgsql/postgis from google maps api to display the markers on the google maps which are stored in the postgis database. Phani Kishore Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread hendrik
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:28:07AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:42:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, > > > > Markus Schilt

[HACKERS] help required regarding queryin postgis database from google maps

2007-02-25 Thread Phani Kishore
hi ! i think u people could probably help me i how to query the pgsql/postgis from google maps api to display the markers on the google maps which are stored in the postgis database. Phani Kishore Tata Consultancy Services Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.tcs.com =-=

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:42:13 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: alvherre> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: alvherre> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: alvherre> > alv

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: markus> Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on what markus> replacement system to use". This has not much to do with the markus> want or need (for lack of a better alt

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [HACKERS] SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread hendrik
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:42:13AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 07:57:53 +0100, Markus > > Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > markus> Uh, yah. But I was refering to the "lots of opinions on w

Re: [HACKERS] [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question

2007-02-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Joshua D. Drake wrote: He didn't say *which* dev cycle. He is just enthusiastic and the reality is this project is about 2 years overdue to run screaming from the burning building that is CVS. Does that mean we should change? Only if the people doing development feel a need to change. However, t

[HACKERS] PGSQL and NPGSQL does not display exact errors

2007-02-25 Thread RPK
PGSQL and NPGSQL does not display exact error while using with VB.NET. We faced a lot of trouble to find out actually where an error occured. For example in a routine we need to insert a record to the table. I forgot to use "values" clause in the Insert Query, but PGSQL displayed error "No source

Re: [HACKERS] error in cvs head: bogus varattno for OUTER var: 5

2007-02-25 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > psql:bogus_varattno_error.sql:23: ERROR: bogus varattno for OUTER var: 5 > > > Any ideas what is causing this? > > This looks pretty nearly related to stuff I've been hacking on recently, > so I suppose I broke so

Re: [HACKERS] error in cvs head: bogus varattno for OUTER var: 5

2007-02-25 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > psql:bogus_varattno_error.sql:23: ERROR: bogus varattno for OUTER var: 5 > Any ideas what is causing this? This looks pretty nearly related to stuff I've been hacking on recently, so I suppose I broke something :-(. Will take a closer look tomorrow.