reducejoins.c ?
flattenjoins.c ?
filterjoins.c ?
--
dim
Le 28 mars 2010 à 22:12, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us a écrit :
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
joinremoval.c ?
Maybe, except as I mentioned in the email
gaurav gupta wrote:
My idea is to add a functionality of Auto tuning and Auto Indexing/
Reindexing in DB languages.
Ah, the classic request to start with the tuning and index wizards.
Really fun to work on, always lots of interest in it. Here's the
thing: projects in this area attract
Hi,
Joseph Adams joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com writes:
As for reinventing the wheel, I'm in the process of writing yet
another JSON implementation simply because I didn't find the other
ones I looked at palatable.
Even this one (ANSI C, MIT Licenced)?
cJSON -- An ultra-lightweight, portable,
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 12:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 18:59 +, Greg Stark wrote:
It occurs to me we could do the same for CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() by
conditionally having it call a function which calls gettimeofday and
Hello
is any reason why join removal doesn't remove useless relation b?
postgres=# \d a
Table public.a
Column | Type | Modifiers
+-+---
a | integer |
Indexes:
a_a_idx UNIQUE, btree (a)
postgres=# \d b
Table public.b
Column | Type |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Per previous discussion, PFA a patch to change the maximum number of
keys for a syscache from 4 to 5.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01105.php
This is intended for application to 9.1, and is
On 2010-03-29 11:19 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
postgres=# explain select a from a left join b on true;
This is effectively a cross join and it would give wrong answers. Try
SELECT a FROM a LEFT JOIN b ON a.a = b.b;
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2010/3/29 Marko Tiikkaja marko.tiikk...@cs.helsinki.fi:
On 2010-03-29 11:19 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
postgres=# explain select a from a left join b on true;
you have a true.
I forgot SELECT DISTINCT
regards
Pavel
This is effectively a cross join and it would give wrong answers. Try
We have planner method parameters for many important parts of the
planner. We don't have any parameter for join removal, AFAIK.
The first question I get asked is can I see the tables it removed?.
This has been asked of me 3 times now this year, always first question.
Same issue applies to
Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
We've got two locations and some individuals signed up for a test-fest
this weekend. Would it be possible to do an alpha release this week?
It would really help to be testing later code than Alpha4.
I'm
Hello
can we add well structured information about function id and lineno to
ErrorData?
Actually we sending some info - but formated as string and only when
Log_error_verbosity = PGERROR_VERBOSE.
I hope, so this feature can help to some interactive GUI managers as
pgAdmin, and to psql too.
On sön, 2010-03-28 at 23:24 -0400, Joseph Adams wrote:
Thus, here's an example of how (in my opinion) character sets and such
should be handled in the JSON code:
Suppose the client's encoding is UTF-16, and the server's encoding is
Latin-1. When JSON is stored to the database:
1. The
On mån, 2010-03-29 at 00:04 -0500, David Christensen wrote:
Enclosed is a patch to add a -C option to initdb to allow you to easily
append configuration directives to the generated postgresql.conf file for use
in programmatic generation.
I like this idea, but please use small -c for
Vladimir Barzionov snego.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
Same problem was already discussed for example here
http://dbaspot.com/forums/postgresql/393683-re-general-custom-c-function-palloc-broken.html
Looks like the simplest way for correcting the issue is declaring additional
macro (something
Similarly using the no. of select hits on a table we can check that if
maximum no. of times it is on a non-index field we can index on that field
to make select faster.
It's impractical to figure out where indexes should go at without
simulating what the optimizer would then do with
Hi,
I've asked this question in novice group and another Postgres forum, but
didn't get any help.
What I want to do is to use HStore data type (namely the HStore keys) in
TSearch. I don't want use TSVector and the original ts_match_vq function,
because I want to be able to control exact values
Hi,
I did some more testing on ecpg and found that allowing variables as cursor
names seems to produce more problems than I anticipated. But then maybe it's
just some missing checks to throw out error messages. Anyway, I attach a small
test program that, from my understanding, should work, but
Robert Haas wrote:
I feel pretty strongly that the data should be stored in the database
in the format in which it will be returned to the user - any
conversion which is necessary should happen on the way in. I am not
100% sure to what extent we should attempt to canonicalize the input
and to
Hi,
I have been using PostGreSQL as a part of our healthcare product. As an
important part of releasing a stable product it is important to also
document the known issues found in a PostGRE release. I would be
grateful if someone could forward me to the Known Issues Page(if any).
On these lines
Hi,
Michael Meskes írta:
Hi,
I did some more testing on ecpg and found that allowing variables as cursor
names seems to produce more problems than I anticipated. But then maybe it's
just some missing checks to throw out error messages. Anyway, I attach a small
test program that, from my
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
We have planner method parameters for many important parts of the
planner. We don't have any parameter for join removal, AFAIK.
The first question I get asked is can I see the tables it removed?.
This has been asked of
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Joachim Wieland j...@mcknight.de wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:32 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Per previous discussion, PFA a patch to change the maximum number of
keys for a syscache from 4 to 5.
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So I think we need a parameter for join removal also.
I had this in my original patch but Tom wanted it taken out.
And I still don't want it. We are NOT going in the direction
Tom Lane escribió:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So I think we need a parameter for join removal also.
I had this in my original patch but Tom wanted it taken out.
And I still don't want it. We are
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Dejneka?= l.dejn...@gmail.com writes:
What I want to do is to use HStore data type (namely the HStore keys) in
TSearch. I don't want use TSVector and the original ts_match_vq function,
because I want to be able to control exact values that are passed to the
search and
People have been talking about a parallel version of pg_dump a few
times already. I have been working on some proof-of-concept code for
this feature every now and then and I am planning to contribute this
for 9.1.
There are two main issues with a parallel version of pg_dump:
The first one is
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:46:48PM +0200, Joachim Wieland wrote:
People have been talking about a parallel version of pg_dump a few
times already. I have been working on some proof-of-concept code for
this feature every now and then and I am planning to contribute this
for 9.1.
There are
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
It seems that what's really needed is some debug output to be able to
find out what it did.
Isn't EXPLAIN good enough?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So I think we need a parameter for join removal also.
I had this in my original patch but Tom wanted it
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
It seems that what's really needed is some debug output to be able to
find out what it did.
+1, i was preparing an env for testing this but in the while i was
thinking how can i know what happens... counting
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
And for the record, I believe I find it rather amusing that you're
asking me if I have the faintest idea how many there would be.
Actually that was directed more at Simon.
I venture to say that after yourself I might be the person who knows
this code
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
It seems that what's really needed is some debug output to be able to
find out what it did.
+1, i was preparing an env for
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
And for the record, I believe I find it rather amusing that you're
asking me if I have the faintest idea how many there would be.
Actually that was directed more at Simon.
I
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Joachim Wieland j...@mcknight.de wrote:
- There are ideas on how to solve the issue with the consistent
snapshot but in the end you can always solve it by stopping your
application(s). I actually assume that whenever people are interested
in a very fast dump,
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
It seems that what's really needed is some debug
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
OK, I'll write a patch for that; and a consensus emerges that we
should also have enable_joinremoval, then I will add that as well. I
think the only argument for NOT having enable_joinremoval is that you
can always modify the query to say SELECT *
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
OK, I'll write a patch for that; and a consensus emerges that we
should also have enable_joinremoval, then I will add that as well. I
think the only argument for NOT having
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
My reasoning for It should be built-in is:
* It would be nice to have a built-in serialization format that's
available by default.
* It might be a little faster
Robert Haas wrote:
The query planner is a great piece of code but it
is not so transparently simple that it doesn't need debugging or
instrumentation, and why did the planner do X has got to be one of
our top ten most-frequently asked questions.
Debugging and instrumentation are two slightly
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
My reasoning for It should be built-in is:
* It would be nice to have a built-in serialization
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
The query planner is a great piece of code but it
is not so transparently simple that it doesn't need debugging or
instrumentation, and why did the planner do X has got to be one of
our top ten
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
at the top of my list in this area for 9.1 is to track down the rumored
patch that exports information about the rejected plans considered and get
that comitted. That always
Hello
this simple patch allow to specify cursor row when some function is
opened in editor.
\e aaa.txt
\a aaa.txt 3 ... move cursor on 3nd line of text
\ef foo
\ef foo 3 ... move cursor on 3nd line of function body
\sf foo ... show function body
\sf+ foo ... show function body - use line numbers
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
at the top of my list in this area for 9.1 is to track down the rumored
patch that exports information about
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
can we add well structured information about function id and lineno to
ErrorData?
The idea that I was toying with was to report the function OID and line
number, which might as well be two separate fields rather than messing
around with anything
Tom Lane wrote:
The problem with this line of thought is that it imagines you can look
at worked-out alternative plans. You can't, because the planner doesn't
pursue rejected alternatives that far (and you'd not want to wait long
enough for it to do so...)
Not on any production system,
2010/3/29 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
can we add well structured information about function id and lineno to
ErrorData?
The idea that I was toying with was to report the function OID and line
number, which might as well be two separate fields
2010/3/29 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Dejneka?= l.dejn...@gmail.com writes:
What I want to do is to use HStore data type (namely the HStore keys) in
TSearch. I don't want use TSVector and the original ts_match_vq function,
because I want to be able to control exact
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Joachim Wieland j...@mcknight.de wrote:
[...]
- Regarding the output of pg_dump I am proposing two solutions. The
first one is to introduce a new archive type directory where each
table and each blob is a file in a directory, similar to the
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
And for the record, I believe I find it rather amusing that you're
asking me if I have the faintest idea how many there would be.
Actually that was directed more at Simon.
I think you should drop
On 3/28/10 8:52 PM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
There's another choice, called BSON.
http://www.mongodb.org/display/DOCS/BSON
I've not researched it yet deeply, it seems reasonable to be stored in
databases as it is invented for MongoDB.
I wouldn't take that for granted. The MongoDB project
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
In many
cases it's not horribly difficult to work around because you can do
SELECT * FROM ... instead of your original select list, but there
might be some cases with multiple levels of views where it isn't that
easy. I think it would be
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Joachim Wieland j...@mcknight.de wrote:
[...]
- Regarding the output of pg_dump I am proposing two solutions. The
first one is to introduce a new
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 11:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
OK, I'll write a patch for that; and a consensus emerges that we
should also have enable_joinremoval, then I will add that as well. I
think the only argument for NOT having enable_joinremoval is
On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
the external library might be.
Perhaps
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:23 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
external library instead, no
or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.
Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows. And snaphsots have more
compile dependancies than releases do.
Also ... this isn't short notice. I requested a
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:43 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Is there a reason that recovery.conf uses true/false, while
postgresql.conf uses on/off?
#recovery_target_inclusive = 'true' # 'true' or 'false'
or are these settings more boolean for some reason?
The code accepts
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
checking that.
Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
checking that.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.
Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows. And snaphsots have more
compile
On 3/29/10 7:46 AM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
I actually assume that whenever people are interested
in a very fast dump, it is because they are doing some maintenance
task (like migrating to a different server) that involves pg_dump. In
these cases, they would stop their system anyway.
Actually,
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
the external library might be.
My understanding
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 13:41, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough.
That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
answer.
Maybe I missed it, but why exactly do they care? About the only
reason I can
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
users know which tables have been removed and whether
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You're not addressing the original point. I have been
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 3/29/10 7:46 AM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
I actually assume that whenever people are interested
in a very fast dump, it is because they are doing some maintenance
task (like migrating to a different server) that involves pg_dump. In
these cases, they
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
Dimitri Fontaine dfonta...@hi-media.com writes:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us writes:
If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:54 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
whatever happened to those hooks to auto create/recommend indexes?
You haven't published them yet??
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes:
On 3/29/10 7:46 AM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
I actually assume that whenever people are interested
in a very fast dump, it is because they are doing some maintenance
task (like migrating to
Alex Hunsaker bada...@gmail.com writes:
It comes to mind you can probably do this with an plannerhook
(whatever happened to those hooks to auto create/recommend indexes?)
Uh, we made some hooks to let someone build an *external* module that
would do such a thing. Whether anybody got anywhere
Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
or just use a specific recent snapshot and let people test that just in
case it is not feasible doing a new alpha on short notice.
Doesn't work if we want to test it on windows. And snaphsots have more
Robert Haas wrote:
It's completely possible that you could want to clone a server for dev
and have more CPU and I/O bandwidth available than can be efficiently
used by a non-parallel pg_dump. But certainly what Joachim is talking
about will be a good start. I think there is merit to the
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc wrote:
yeah but you also need people changing the website - and probably more
important given that josh wants windows as well help from dave for doing a
new windows installer :)
True... well, I can't help with those
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs
On sön, 2010-03-28 at 19:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
We've got two locations and some individuals signed up for a test-fest
this weekend. Would it be possible to do an alpha release this week?
It would really help to be
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Anindya Jyoti Roy anind...@iitk.ac.in wrote:
I want to implement a image database system: This will have the following
quality:
1 will store image along with the other attributes
2 the database search engine will be able to search for image also
3 it will list
The idea crudely is the following:
I want to implement a image database system: This will have the
following quality:
This seems fine, but I believe it's been done before. You might want to
search for existing projects, and make an improvement on an existing
project rather than starting
Last i heard from Dave on that topic is that there's no chance of that
happening that quickly. He's on a plane now but I'm sure he'll confirm that
when he lands.
/Magnus
On Mar 29, 2010 6:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2010-03-28 at 19:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On
Maybe this can be helpful:
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=softwords=fingerprint
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=softwords=image+recogniti
on
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 19:08 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
To be really useful, this would probably need
some kind of index support, maybe based on GIN.
Yes.
You're not going to
get that done by August even if you start now and don't sleep.
The extensibility mechanism is designed so that an
Josh Berkus escribió:
And snaphsots have more compile dependancies than releases do.
As far as I know, a snapshot is identical to a release in that regard.
If they are not, that's a bug and we can fix it before weekend.
--
Alvaro Herrera
On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 01:33 +0530, Anindya Jyoti Roy wrote:
I have some idea of implementing am image database system, which will
let you search against the image and fingerprint:
The idea crudely is the following:
I want to implement a image database system: This will have the
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
If standby_mode is enabled, and neither primary_conninfo nor restore_command
are set, the standby would get stuck. How about forbidding (i.e.,
Hi, I have some questions about 9.0 release note.
I'd like to work for some of them if required. Comments welcome.
* Allow per-tablespace sequential and random page cost variables
(seq_page_cost/(random_page_cost)) via ALTER TABLESPACE ... SET/RESET
^^
Are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:33:59AM +0530, Anindya Jyoti Roy wrote:
I have some idea of implementing am image database system, which will let
you search against the image and fingerprint:
As others already pointed out, this seems a huge task for a
87 matches
Mail list logo
