Hi, all.
I built pgsql with following regulation (for buildfarm new entry).
- Windows Server 2008 64bit
- VC2005
- 9.0dev (HEAD near alpha5) 64bit
And I got a fail at vcregress contribcheck about only pgcrypto.
All CREATE FUNCTION of pgcrypto got ERROR.
(It passed vcregress check)
STATEMENT:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
More to the point, I'm not sure I like the creation of yet another DLL
to deal with this. The reason this isn't just exported from the main
backend is the same reason we created the libpqwalreceiver library I'm
sure -
Hi, all.
I built pgsql with following regulation (for buildfarm new entry).
- Windows Server 2008 64bit
- VC2005
- 9.0dev (HEAD near alpha5) 64bit
And I got a fail at vcregress contribcheck about only pgcrypto.
All CREATE FUNCTION of pgcrypto got ERROR.
(It passed vcregress check)
STATEMENT:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I disapprove of the whole approach, actually. The right way to fix this
is to not touch or replace libpq at all, but to change walreceiver to
use libpq's async-query facilities directly. Instead of PQexec, use
PQsendQuery
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per docs.
On the recent discussion (*1), some people argued that specifying neither
primary_conninfo nor restore_command in the
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:54 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Agreed. I think if the server starts up in standby mode and it is an
inconsistent state with no source of WAL, then the startup process
should exit with a suitable error message, which AIUI will result in
the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Even more to the point is that some of them, like PGPORT, are highly
likely to be set in a server's environment to point to the server
itself. It
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per docs.
On the recent discussion (*1), some people argued that
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 07:16, TAKATSUKA Haruka haru...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Hi, all.
I built pgsql with following regulation (for buildfarm new entry).
- Windows Server 2008 64bit
- VC2005
- 9.0dev (HEAD near alpha5) 64bit
And I got a fail at vcregress contribcheck about only pgcrypto.
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:54 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Agreed. I think if the server starts up in standby mode and it is an
inconsistent state with no source of WAL, then the startup process
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 12:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com writes:
I cannot figure out at all what is wrong. Have any idea?
Since nobody else is reporting this, it seems like it must be either
something messed up about your system, or something wrong with your
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 07:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:54 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Agreed. I think if the server starts up in standby mode and it is an
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 07:11 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:54 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
Agreed.
Hello to all,
I realized index for moving objects in PostgreSQL DB, using GisT and I want
to write an article in the conference. It will be not a scientific paper,
but application track.
Can anybody tell the conference where I could publish my work ? :)
Best regards,
Sergej Galkin
Hi Sergej,
you can found many scientific conferences having an application (or
demonstration) session. I am sure that your work will interest them.
Some scientific conferences having a demonstration session:
- Very Large Data Base (VLDB);
- International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE);
Magnus, Thanks your help.
When I set 64bit version of zlib1.dll, msvcr80.dll and msvcr90.dll into
Windows\system32 directory correctiry, it run well.
(Perhaps I did copy with MSYS's cp command that does not work on
system directory.)
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:44:53 +0200
Magnus Hagander
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Any objections for the following fix?
- cygwin_conv_to_full_win32_path(cmdLine, buf);
+ cygwin_conv_path(CCP_POSIX_TO_WIN_A, cmdLine, buf, sizeof(buf));
Buildfarm member brown_bat didn't like this. Seeing that that's the
*only*
Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp writes:
Do we still need VACUUM FULL in initdb? VACUUM FULL in 9.0 rewrites
all tables, so those operations are a little more expensive than
previous releases. Is it worth replacing them into VACUUM?
I had left it that way intentionally to make
On fre, 2010-04-02 at 14:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Robert,
do you think you could put up replacement tarballs today?
If you don't hear from him soon, perhaps he's
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped. configure/configure.in still
say 9.0devel.
Sure, because the tag is on a branch. According to the commit message
that went by, Robert did that correctly:
On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped. configure/configure.in
still
say 9.0devel.
Sure, because the tag is on a branch. According to the commit message
that went by, Robert did
Is there any alternative of mysql function COUNT(DISTINCT expr,[expr...]) in
postgres. We get error if we
write count like this count(distinct profile.id, profile.name, profile.age)
but it works well in mysql.
Reference url is given below
Hi,
I have an application project based on a database.
I am really interested in using PostgreSQL.
I have only one issue, I want to use autonomous transactions to put in place
a debug / logging functionality.
To do so, I insert messages in a debug table.
The problem is, if the main transaction /
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+ Exclusion constraints ensure that if any two rows are compared on
+ the specified columns or expressions using the specified operators,
+ at least one of these operator comparisons will
junaidmalik14 junaidmali...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any alternative of mysql function COUNT(DISTINCT
expr,[expr...]) in postgres. We get error if we write count like
this count(distinct profile.id, profile.name, profile.age)
Is that semantically different from this SQL standard syntax?:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Loïc Vaumerel she...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to use real and clean autonomous transactions in PostgreSQL
yet ?
No.
If no, is it planned to do so ? When ?
To my knowledge, no one is working on this.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
2010/4/5 Giles Lean giles.l...@pobox.com:
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Could this be an issue with VirtualBox? Have you used this VM for
testing before?
I'm not sure that this helps much as it doesn't rule out
VirtualBox, but my experience with it running Linux has
been positive.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:59 AM, junaidmalik14 junaidmali...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any alternative of mysql function COUNT(DISTINCT expr,[expr...]) in
postgres. We get error if we
write count like this count(distinct profile.id, profile.name, profile.age)
but it works well in mysql.
Simon Riggs wrote:
I am very disconcerted that there are still no docs whatsoever to
describe how the server works in these new modes.
I did add a few paragraphs last week, see
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/warm-standby.html#STANDBY-SERVER-OPERATION.
It doesn't explicitly talk
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Loïc Vaumerel she...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
All solutions I found are working the same way : they use dblink.
I consider these solution more as handiwork than a clean solution.
I am a little bit concerned about side effects as dblink were not intially
designed
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT DISTINCT profile.id, profile.name,
profile.age FROM ...) x;
Ah, I see what they wanted now. In older versions of PostgreSQL,
they might get better performance in some cases by using GROUP BY:
SELECT
Patch attached to show the schema *and* table name when doing
a REINDEX DATABASE.
--
Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com g...@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
Index: backend/commands/indexcmds.c
===
RCS
2010/4/5 Kevin Grittner kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT DISTINCT profile.id, profile.name,
profile.age FROM ...) x;
Ah, I see what they wanted now. In older versions of PostgreSQL,
they might get better
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 19:01 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
I am very disconcerted that there are still no docs whatsoever to
describe how the server works in these new modes.
I did add a few paragraphs last week, see
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 18:03 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
I'm leaning toward postponing the item to v9.1 or later.
If you want to defer anything, then I'd like to get a summary of what
you are thinking of deferring and why that is acceptable. Right now
there are lots of unfinished items and no
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per docs.
On the recent discussion (*1), some people argued that
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 19:29 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Looking through the code some more I note that their are two timing
related parameters that are hardcoded into XLogPageRead(). At the very
least such things should be #defines, though one of them was previously
configurable using
Simon Riggs escribió:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per docs.
On the recent discussion (*1), some
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 15:02 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Simon Riggs escribió:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org wrote:
Log Message:
---
Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 15:02 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Simon Riggs escribió:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 17:08 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Simon Riggs sri...@postgresql.org
wrote:
Log
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
(errmsg(recovery command file \%s\
specified neither primary_conninfo nor restore_command,
-
RECOVERY_COMMAND_FILE)));
+
Josh Berkus wrote:
I started with pgbench performance comparisons:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Pgbenchtesting
I'd already created
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Regression_Testing_with_pgbench for this
purpose, and it looks like you started where I ended that, more or less,
which is
Greg,
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Regression_Testing_with_pgbench for this
purpose, and it looks like you started where I ended that, more or less,
which is good because you didn't duplicate anything I'd already
written.
Lucky! I didn't find that one when I looked.
FWIW, the new
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 15:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
(errmsg(recovery command file \%s\
specified neither primary_conninfo nor restore_command,
-
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 15:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
(errmsg(recovery command file \%s\
specified neither primary_conninfo nor
Hitoshi Harada umi.tan...@gmail.com wrote:
Just note, I rebooted the guest VM today and retried but things are as
before. The host reboot doesn't affect either.
Bad luck. :-(
I also tried another CentOS5.4 VM on the same VirtualBox and succeeded
to build. Another RHEL Server 5.2 (Tikanga)
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
+ Exclusion constraints ensure that if any two rows are compared on
+ the specified columns or expressions using the specified operators,
+ at least one of these
Another JSON strictness issue: the JSON standard (
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt ) states that JSON text can only
be an array or object. However, my implementation currently accepts
any valid value. Thus, '3', 'hello', 'true', 'false', and 'null'
are all accepted by my implementation, but
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Joseph Adams
joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, we should accept an atomic value as valid JSON content.
That seems right to me.
Also, should we go even further and accept key:value pairs by themselves? :
'key:value'::JSON
Definitely not.
Dne 6.4.2010 5:50, Joseph Adams napsal(a):
Another JSON strictness issue: the JSON standard (
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt ) states that JSON text can only
be an array or object. However, my implementation currently accepts
any valid value. Thus, '3', 'hello', 'true', 'false', and
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
- cygwin_conv_to_full_win32_path(cmdLine, buf);
+ cygwin_conv_path(CCP_POSIX_TO_WIN_A, cmdLine, buf, sizeof(buf));
Buildfarm member brown_bat didn't like this. Seeing that that's the
*only* active cygwin buildfarm member, that's not a good
All,
Wheeler has been doing some head-to-head performance testing of
Bricolage performance on 8.4 vs. 9.0. So far, 9.0 has been slower, and
I've been trying to track down the particular areas where it is.
One appears to be prepared query parsing. One test of the Bricolage
test suite creates 89
Hackers,
Continuing the performance test:
DBD, like a number of monitoring systems, does pings on the database
which look like this:
SELECT 'DBD::Pg ping test';
In our test, which does 5801 of these pings during the test, they take
an average of 15x longer to execute on 9.0 as 8.4 ( 0.77ms vs.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I was also surprised to note that the Startup process is not signaled by
WALReceiver when new WAL is received, so it will continue sleeping even
though it has work to do.
I don't think this is so useful in 9.0 since
Hackers,
Followup to Josh's posts.
I'm getting Bricolage 2.0 ready to ship, and took some time to test it on
PostgreSQL 9.0 today. I built PostgreSQL from Git/master with:
./configure --with-libs=/usr/local/lib
--with-includes=/usr/local/include --prefix=$BASE --with-perl PERL=$PERL
55 matches
Mail list logo
