Excerpts from Jeff Davis's message of vie jul 08 00:58:20 -0400 2011:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 12:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I think it's probably too late to go fiddling with the behavior of 9.0
> > at this point. If we change the text of error messages, there is a
> > chance that it might b
Can someone help me understand pg_locks? There are three fields related
to virtual and real xids:
virtualtransaction | text |
transactionid | xid |
virtualxid | text |
Our docs say 'virtualtransaction' is:
Virtual ID of the transaction that is holding or awa
Shigeru Hanada escribió:
> (2011/06/26 18:34), Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> > I checked your patch.
>
> Thanks for the review! Please find attached a revised patch.
Err, \dec seems to have a line in describe.h but nowhere else; are you
going to introduce that command?
The new ALTER TABLE grammar seems
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie jul 08 23:30:10 -0400 2011:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > The attached patch introduces pg_constraint rows for NOT NULL
> > column constraints.
> >
> > This patch is a heavily reworked version of Bernd Helmle's patch here:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:29 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
> wrote:
>> hi,
>> would it be possible to incorporate
>> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/Enhanced-psql in core PostgreSQL/psql?
>>
>> This patch adds lots of nice functionalities, w
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:29 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
wrote:
> hi,
> would it be possible to incorporate
> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/Enhanced-psql in core PostgreSQL/psql?
>
> This patch adds lots of nice functionalities, which we could definitely
> use.
>
big part of this seems to be
2011/7/9 hubert depesz lubaczewski :
> hi,
> would it be possible to incorporate
> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/Enhanced-psql in core PostgreSQL/psql?
>
> This patch adds lots of nice functionalities, which we could definitely
> use.
Some features are very interesting but I I would suggest to
It bit rotted a bit find a new version attached that includes the
following fixes:
- show_session_authorization() no longer exists, instead access the
session_authorization_guc directly (like we do for show_role in
commands/variable.c). I find it quite ugly tho...
- it changed %u to %U and %U to b
Jeff Davis wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 23:39 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
What if you used the context of the calling code and resolve in favor of
whatever match is closest to it? The problem is related to general-purpose
programming languages.
Basically start looking in the lexical context
On tor, 2011-07-07 at 17:34 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The attached patch introduces pg_constraint rows for NOT NULL
> column constraints.
The information schema views check_constraints and table_constraints
currently make up some artificial constraint names for not-null
constraints. I suppos
On 2011-07-09 16:23, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
2011/7/5 Hitoshi Harada:
2011/7/5 Yeb Havinga:
Hello Hitosh, list,
Attached is revised version.
I failed to attached the patch. I'm trying again.
I'm currently unable to test, since on holiday. I'm happy to continue
testing once returned but it ma
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 22:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm wondering if we might want to call this out with a or
> similar... especially if we're only going to put it into the 9.0
> docs.
Sure, sounds good.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@p
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 23:39 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> What if you used the context of the calling code and resolve in favor of
> whatever match is closest to it? The problem is related to general-purpose
> programming languages.
>
> Basically start looking in the lexical context for an "x"
2011/6/19 Hitoshi Harada :
> 2011/6/17 Andrew Tipton :
>>
>> At this point I'm a bit lost -- while pg_amop.h has plenty of examples
>> of crosstype comparison operators for btree index methods, there are
>> none for GiST. Is GiST somehow a special case in this regard?
>
> It was I that was lost. A
2011/7/5 Hitoshi Harada :
> 2011/7/5 Yeb Havinga :
>> Hello Hitosh, list,
>>
>>> >
>>> > Attached is revised version.
>>>
>>> I failed to attached the patch. I'm trying again.
>>>
>> I'm currently unable to test, since on holiday. I'm happy to continue
>> testing once returned but it may not be wit
hi,
would it be possible to incorporate
http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/Enhanced-psql in core PostgreSQL/psql?
This patch adds lots of nice functionalities, which we could definitely
use.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 10:52:33AM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> 2011/7/9 Noah Misch :
> > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:00:30AM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> >> The attached patch is a revised version according to the approach that
> >> updates
> >> pg_class system catalog before AlterTableInternal().
2011/7/9 Noah Misch :
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:00:30AM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> The attached patch is a revised version according to the approach that
>> updates
>> pg_class system catalog before AlterTableInternal().
>> It invokes the new ResetViewOptions when rel->rd_options is not null
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:00:30AM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> The attached patch is a revised version according to the approach that updates
> pg_class system catalog before AlterTableInternal().
> It invokes the new ResetViewOptions when rel->rd_options is not null, and it
> set
> null on the p
2011/7/9 Robert Haas :
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Note that it does not matter whether we're actually doing an index scan -- a
>> seq
>> scan with a filter using only leakproof operators is equally acceptable.
>> What I
>> had in mind was to enumerate all operators i
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 21:04 -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> > I think you should make more of an effort to understand how the system
> > works now, and why, before proposing radical redesigns.
>
> Well yes, of course. But that will take time and I think I already
> understand
> enough about it to
2011/7/9 Robert Haas :
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> I definitely agree with this idea. It will enables to eliminate ugly switch
>> statements for error-messaging reasons.
>
> All right, so please submit a patch that introduces that concept
> first, and then resubmit thi
2011/7/8 Noah Misch :
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:20:46AM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> 2011/7/7 Noah Misch :
>> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:56:26PM +0100, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>> >> 2011/7/7 Noah Misch :
>> >> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:25:12PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>
>> >> > That gets the
23 matches
Mail list logo
