On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Oh, I'd forgotten that worked that way. Frankly, that makes me quite a
bit more concerned about this proposal
On 28.08.2012 22:50, Ants Aasma wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Seems like that's down to the CPU not doing rep stosq particularly
quickly, which might well be chip-specific.
AMD optimization manual[1] states the following:
For repeat counts of
2012/8/28 Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp:
2012/8/28 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Kohei KaiGai kai...@kaigai.gr.jp writes:
Would it be too invasive to introduce a new pointer in TupleTableSlot
that is NULL for anything but virtual tuples from foreign tables?
I'm not certain whether the
2012/8/28 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:08:59PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
2012/8/28 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 05:18:34PM +0200, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
2012/8/28 David Fetter da...@fetter.org:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:58:25AM -0400,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
That argument would hold water if we got rid of every single usage of
overloading in the system-defined operators/functions, which as you well
know is not an attractive idea. Since that's not going to happen,
arguing for
On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 9:33 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 09:40:33AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
Added to TODO:
Allow reporting of stalls due to
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
To put some concreteness into what so far has been a pretty hand-wavy
discussion, I experimented with the attached patch. I'm not sure that
it exactly corresponds to what you proposed, but I think this is the
only place the
Based on the discussion and suggestions in this mail chain, following
features can be implemented:
1. To compute the value of max LSN in data pages based on user input
whether he wants it for an individual
file, a particular directory or whole database.
2a. To search the available
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:56:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:24:26AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
It's a pretty strange line wrap you got in this version of the patch.
Normally we just let the string run past the 78 char limit,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:26:30PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
So a patch of 1K lines would by itself represent about 2% of the typical
inter-branch delta. Maybe that's below our threshold of pain, or maybe
it isn't. I'd be happier about it if there were a more compelling
argument for it,
On 29/08/12 23:34, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
To put some concreteness into what so far has been a pretty hand-wavy
discussion, I experimented with the attached patch. I'm not sure that
it exactly corresponds to what you proposed, but
From: pgsql-bugs-ow...@postgresql.org [pgsql-bugs-ow...@postgresql.org] on
behalf of Bruce Momjian [br...@momjian.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 8:46 AM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Robert Haas; Hitoshi Harada; pgsql-b...@postgresql.org;
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
This patch is mainly doing four things:
1. take some typedefs and the HeapTupleData struct definition from
access/htup.h, and put them in access/tupbasics.h. This new file
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
The upshot here appears to be that we're kind of schizophrenic about
what we want. With things like text || anyelement, anyelement ||
text, and concat(variadic any) we are basically asserting that we
want to treat anything that we don't recognize as a
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
I am thinking about to implement multi-master option for pgbench.
Please consider using Tsung, which solves that problem and many others.
http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL :
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié ago 29 11:32:04 -0400 2012:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
This should
reduce the number of changes needed, not only in our code but third
party code. Not sure if the new file could sanely be called
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
Also, is there any reason to consider just moving those defs into
heapam.h, instead of inventing a new header? I'm not sure if there's
any principled distinction between heap.h
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
... we already have catalog/heap.h, so that would be one reason to avoid
that name.
Yeah, good point. We do have some duplicate file names elsewhere, but
it's not a terribly good practice.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 05:47:14 PM Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
Also, is there any reason to consider just moving those defs into
heapam.h, instead of inventing a new header? I'm
On 8/29/12 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
regression=# select lpad(42,8);
ERROR: failed to find conversion function from integer to text
I'm not sure why that's happening, either, but evidently some
additional coercion laxity would required.
This, however, is a trivial problem; make_fn_arguments
So Andres Freund floated a proposal to create an xlogdump sort of tool,
in core, and posted a patch.
One advantage of having xlogdump in core is that we can have buildfarm
test that part of the Xlog code, which currently sees no testing at all.
In fact we could use it as a testbed for XLog in
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 8/29/12 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
regression=# select lpad(42,8);
We are not seriously intending to make the above query work, are we?
Well, *I* don't want to, but apparently Robert does.
I don't really want to go much further than finding a way to
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org writes:
I looked at Andres' patch and the general idea is rather horrible: it
links all backend files into the output executable. This is so that the
*_desc functions can be used from their respective object files, which
obviously have a lot of
Applied.
---
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:51:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:56:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:24:26AM -0400,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 8/29/12 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
regression=# select lpad(42,8);
We are not seriously intending to make the above query work, are we?
Well, *I* don't want to, but apparently
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On the more general issue, I continue to see minimal risk of harm in
allowing things like LPAD() to implicitly cast the first argument to
text.
Well, I see your point about LPAD(), but the problem is how to tell
the difference between a harmless cast
Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org writes:
I am thinking about to implement multi-master option for pgbench.
Please consider using Tsung, which solves that problem and many others.
http://tsung.erlang-projects.org/
Thank you for introducing Tsung. I have some questions regarding it.
Does
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 13:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Hannu Krosing ha...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ?
Same as it's been for a long time: FOR UPDATE [ OF table_name ]
works fine.
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net
wrote:
On
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:19:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
llist_opt: 9289 tps
HEAD: 9286 tps
llist_opt: 9407 tps
Which gives us ~1.3% improvment.
Trying out some different options- going with 32 pre-allocated
ListCell's
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:03:18PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Chander Ganesan chan...@otg-nc.com wrote:
Hi All,
I just realized that anyone can listen for notifications (using listen) so
long as they know the channel name. This means that a user could
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:19:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Dropping it to 4 improved performance a bit: 9476 tps.
Going to keep playing around and see where this goes.
Any status on this?
Based on the test runs that I did using
Excerpts from Stephen Frost's message of mié ago 29 21:46:06 -0400 2012:
Based on the test runs that I did using Josh's box (thanks!), the
performance with the pre-allocation patch and an pre-alloc of 8 ends up
being about a wash. Allocating less (4) or more (16) actually makes
things worse.
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié ago 29 21:25:11 -0400 2012:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:57:37PM -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Fri, May 11,
On 19 February 2012 05:24, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have attached tps scatterplots. The obvious conclusion appears to
be that, with only 16MB of wal_buffers, the buffer wraps around with
some regularity: we can't insert more WAL because the buffer we need
to use still
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 22:23 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Where are we on building the development docs more frequently?
Still waiting for details on how it works to set that up on the
buildfarm client.
Where are we on this?
Waiting on Andrew.
As far as I can see, we need
On 08/29/2012 11:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 22:23 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Where are we on building the development docs more frequently?
Still waiting for details on how it works to set that up on the
buildfarm client.
Where are we on this?
Waiting on Andrew.
Hello,
when running VACUUM ANALYZE on my database built on win32-x86 from
yesterday's git checkout I always get this at some point during VACUUM
ANALYZE:
LOG: server process (PID 5880) was terminated by exception 0xC094
DETAIL: Failed process was running: VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE
HINT: See
38 matches
Mail list logo
