On 16 July 2014 23:12, Tom Lane wrote
Christoph Berg c...@df7cb.de writes:
Re: Viswanatham kirankumar 2014-07-16
ec867def52699d4189b584a14baa7c2165440...@blreml504-mbx.china.huawei.com
Attached patch is implementing following TODO item Process
pg_hba.conf keywords as case-insensitive
Hmm.
On 23 Červenec 2014, 7:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
updated version is in attachment
OK, thanks. The new version seems OK to me.
Tomas
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Hi,
At 1047 line of receivelog.c:CopyStreamPoll(), we set NULL to
timeoutptr variable.
if the value of timeoutprt is set NULL then the process will wait
until can read socket using by select() function as following.
if (timeout_ms 0)
timeoutptr = NULL;
else
2014-07-23 8:38 GMT+02:00 Tomas Vondra t...@fuzzy.cz:
On 23 Červenec 2014, 7:36, Pavel Stehule wrote:
updated version is in attachment
OK, thanks. The new version seems OK to me.
Thank you
Pavel
Tomas
I'm trying to understand what would it take to have this patch in an
acceptable form before the next commitfest. Both Abhijit and Andres has
done some extensive review of the patch and have given many useful
suggestions to Rahila. While she has incorporated most of them, I feel we
are still some
Re: Viswanatham kirankumar 2014-07-23
ec867def52699d4189b584a14baa7c2165442...@blreml504-mbx.china.huawei.com
3) Host name is not a SQL object so it will be treated as case-sensitive
except for all, samehost, samenet are considered as keywords.
For these user need to use quotes to
It seems at least the 9.0 PDFs are broken (trying to build for the release):
Lots of errors/warnings (and AFAIK no way to see which is which in the
output), but It hink this is the telltale as usual:
Overfull \hbox (7.12454pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 88092--88092
[]\T1/pcr/m/n/9 CREATE
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
It seems at least the 9.0 PDFs are broken (trying to build for the release):
Lots of errors/warnings (and AFAIK no way to see which is which in the
output), but It hink this is the telltale as usual:
Overfull \hbox
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Thomas Munro mu...@ip9.org wrote:
Please find attached a rebased version of my SKIP LOCKED
patch (formerly SKIP LOCKED DATA), updated to support only the
Oracle-like syntax.
Hi Thomas,
Apologies for taking this long to get to reviewing this, I'd gotten a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
It seems at least the 9.0 PDFs are broken (trying to build for the release):
Lots of errors/warnings (and AFAIK no way to see which is which
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
It seems at least the 9.0 PDFs are broken (trying to build for
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
! pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than
\pd
Additional point of info - the -US pdf's do build on this version,
just not the -A4.
And
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
! pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than
\pd
Additional point of
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Then, looking at the code, we would need to tweak XLogInsert for the
WAL record construction to always do a FPW and to update
XLogCheckBufferNeedsBackup. Then for the redo part, we would need to
do some extra
Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
While playing on Windows with services, I noticed an inconsistent behavior
in the way failures are handled when using a service for a Postgres
instance.
...
However when a backend process is directly killed something different
happens.
Was
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Was that a backend that you directly killed? Or the postmaster? The
subsequent connection failures suggest it was the postmaster. Killing
the postmaster is not a supported operation, not on Windows and not
anywhere else
Hello,
I'm investigating a mysterious hang problem on PostgreSQL 9.2.8. If many
sessions use temporary tables whose rows are deleted on commit, the hang
occurs. I'd like to show you the stack trace, but I'm trying to figure out
how to reproduce the problem. IIRC, the stack trace was as
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
A more robust fix would be to identify the para where the problem actually
is and re-word it so that the link doesn't cross a *line* boundary (in
either US or A4). That makes it
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
Have you figured out any way to actually track down which para has the
problem itself, or is it all manual work?
Oh ... the TUG page now has a recipe for finding the problem less
painfully, which I don't recall having seen before:
Hi All,
I am doing programming with postgresql source code. I want to find out the
function which can give me Least active transaction id currenty in the
system.
Is there any function which can give me that?
Regards,
Rohit Goyal
MauMau maumau...@gmail.com writes:
Looking at smgrtruncate(), the sinval message is sent even when the
truncated relation is a temporary relation. However, I think the sinval
message is not necessary for temp relations, because each session doesn't
see the temp relations of other sessions.
On 23 July 2014 15:14, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have spent some time digging more into this idea and finished with the
patch attached
Thank you for investigating the idea. I'll review by Monday.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
pgbench with gaussian exponential, part 1 of 2.
This patch is a subset of the previous patch which only adds the two
new \setrandom gaussian and exponantial variants, but not the
adapted pgbench test cases, as
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Patch 1 does a couple of things:
- fuzzystrmatch is dumped to 1.1, as Levenshtein functions are not part of
it anymore, and moved to core.
- Removal of the LESS_EQUAL flag that made the original submission patch
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There are several possible methods of doing that, but I think the best
one is just to leave the SQL-callable C functions in fuzzystrmatch and
move only the underlying code that supports into core.
I hadn't been paying close attention to this thread,
From: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
This seems like a pretty unsafe suggestion, because the smgr level doesn't
know or care whether relations are temp; files are files. In any case it
would only paper over one specific instance of whatever problem you're
worried about, because sinval messages
Hello Robert,
Some review comments:
Thanks a lot for your return.
Please find attached two new parts of the patch (A for setrandom
extension, B for pgbench embedded test case extension).
1. I suggest that getExponentialrand and getGaussianrand be renamed to
getExponentialRand and
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Meh. A understandable syntax wouldn't require the pullups with a special
scan node and such.
Well, in general ExecModifyTable()/ExecUpdate()
That seems like a nonstarter :-(. Index-only scans don't have a license
to return approximations. If we drop the behavior for circles, how much
functionality do we have left?
It should work with exact operator classes, box_ops, point_ops,
range_ops, inet_ops.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
No, ALTER SYSTEM is there now and it needs to work right in its first
release. I will go fix this if nobody else does.
Just checking -- you didn't get around to dealing with this, right?
Not yet... do
Jonathan S. Katz jonathan.k...@excoventures.com wrote:
before embarking on something laborious (as even just indexing
is nontrivial), I think it would be good to figure out how people
are using IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM and if there is interest in
having it be indexable, let alone used in a JOIN
I wrote:
Oh ... the TUG page now has a recipe for finding the problem less
painfully, which I don't recall having seen before:
http://ftp.tug.org/mail-archives/pdftex/2002-February/002216.html
In short, you can add a draft option that lets PDF output get generated
anyway, and then you can
Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
Well that definitely answers how hard would it be. - before
embarking on something laborious (as even just indexing is
nontrivial), I think it would be good to figure out how people are
using IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM and if there is interest in having it be
indexable,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
There are several possible methods of doing that, but I think the best
one is just to leave the SQL-callable C functions in fuzzystrmatch and
move only the underlying code that supports into core.
For some reason I
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
During internals tests, it is observed that checkpointer
is getting crashed on slave with below log on slave in
windows:
LOG: checkpointer process (PID 4040) was terminated by exception 0xC005
HINT: See C
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Emre Hasegeli e...@hasegeli.com wrote:
The first two shapes on src/test/regress/sql/polygon.sql do not make
sense to me. They look more like polygons with some more tabs,
but still did not match the coordinates. I changed them to make
consistent with the
Hi All,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Rohit Goyal rhtgyl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am doing programming with postgresql source code. I want to find out the
function which can give me Least active transaction id currenty in the
system.
Is there any function which can give me that?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This all seems completely to one side of Andres's point. I think what
he's saying is: don't implement an SQL syntax of the form INSERT ON
CONFLICT and let people use that to implement upsert. Instead,
directly
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Emre Hasegeli e...@hasegeli.com wrote:
The first two shapes on src/test/regress/sql/polygon.sql do not make
sense to me.
Well, I think the number of tabs that makes them look best depends on
your tab-stop setting.
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
For some reason I thought that that was what Michael was proposing - a
more comprehensive move of code into core than the structuring that I
proposed. I actually thought about a Levenshtein distance operator at
one point months ago, before I entirely gave up on that.
On 07/23/2014 06:31 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Do we actually have any buildfarm boxes building the PDFs? And if so,
any idea why they didn't catch it?
AFAIK, nobody's ever asked for such a thing. The docs optional step just
builds the default docs target, which is simply the HTML docs.
Krystian Bigaj krystian.bi...@gmail.com writes:
- when pg_console_handler receives CTRL_SHUTDOWN_EVENT from OS, then it
calls pg_queue_signal(SIGINT).
Problems:
- when OS is in shutdown path, then it sends CTRL_SHUTDOWN_EVENT, and *all*
Postgres processes (main and sub/forked) will call
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 07/23/2014 06:31 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Do we actually have any buildfarm boxes building the PDFs? And if so,
any idea why they didn't catch it?
AFAIK, nobody's ever asked for such a thing. The docs
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I had two thoughts:
1. Should we consider making levenshtein available to frontend programs
as well as backend?
I don't think so. Why would that be useful?
2. Would it provide better matching to use
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
That means should I
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44:37AM -0400, Tom
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest something like:
UPSERT table SET col = value [, ...] WHERE predicate;
I don't think this is actually good enough. Typical use cases are
things like increment this counter or insert a new one starting at
0.
Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I still strongly feel it ought to be driven by an insert
Could you clarify that? Does this mean that you feel that we
should write to the heap before reading the index to see if the row
will be a duplicate? If so, I think that is a bad idea, since this
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Emre Hasegeli e...@hasegeli.com wrote:
The first two shapes on src/test/regress/sql/polygon.sql do not make
sense to me.
Well, I think the number of
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
This all seems completely to one side of Andres's point. I think what
he's saying is: don't implement an SQL syntax of the form INSERT ON
CONFLICT
On 23 July 2014 22:16, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Krystian Bigaj krystian.bi...@gmail.com writes:
- when pg_console_handler receives CTRL_SHUTDOWN_EVENT from OS, then it
calls pg_queue_signal(SIGINT).
Problems:
- when OS is in shutdown path, then it sends CTRL_SHUTDOWN_EVENT,
Peter Geoghegan-3 wrote
with semantics like this:
1. Search the table, using any type of scan you like, for a row
matching the given predicate.
Perhaps I've misunderstood, but this is fundamentally different to
what I'd always thought would need to happen. I always understood that
the
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Could you clarify that? Does this mean that you feel that we
should write to the heap before reading the index to see if the row
will be a duplicate? If so, I think that is a bad idea, since this
will sometimes be used
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There are several possible methods of doing that, but I think the best
one is just to leave the SQL-callable C functions in fuzzystrmatch and
move only the underlying code that
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
Maybe that would be marginally better than classic Levenshtein
distance, but I doubt it would pay for itself. It's just more code to
maintain. Are we really expecting to not get the best possible
suggestion due to some number of transposition errors very frequently?
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
2. If you find more than one tuple that is visible to your scan, error.
This point seems to concern making the UPSERT
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
To the last question, yes. To the first point, I'm not bent on this
particular syntax, but I am +1 for the idea that the command is
something specifically upsert-like rather than something more generic
like an ON
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I think it would be very useful to have. Given how long it takes to
build not all the time, but running it every couple of days or weekly
or so would be quite useful. Then we'd catch things earlier and not
have to spend as much time trying to figure out exactly what
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:51:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
Diagnose incompatible OpenLDAP versions during build and test.
Hmm. I'm pretty sure it is not considered good style to drop AC_DEFUN
blocks right into configure.in; at least, we have never done
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:51:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Hmm. I'm pretty sure it is not considered good style to drop AC_DEFUN
blocks right into configure.in; at least, we have never done that before.
PGAC_LDAP_SAFE should get defined somewhere in
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd suggest something like:
UPSERT table SET col = value [, ...] WHERE predicate;
I think I see another problem with this. The UPDATE must provide a
WHERE clause Var on a unique indexed column (let's say it's
constrained
postgres has fantastic date-time parsing. I've tried some Java libraries
that advertise amazing time parsing. But nothing seems to match postgres's
time parsing. I started peeking through the source to find a reference to
a library that postgres might be using for time parsing. no luck. Where
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
Okay, but how does this justify to add below new text in README.
+ Even with these read locks, Lehman and Yao's approach obviates the
+ need
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
No, ALTER SYSTEM is there now and it needs to work right in its first
release. I will go fix this if nobody else does.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
As such there is no problem in saying the way you have mentioned, but
I feel it would be better if we can mention the mechanism of _bt_search()
as quoted by you upthread in the first line.
In more concrete terms,
Hi
2014-07-24 3:49 GMT+02:00 Charlie Holleran scorpdaddy...@gmail.com:
postgres has fantastic date-time parsing. I've tried some Java libraries
that advertise amazing time parsing. But nothing seems to match postgres's
time parsing. I started peeking through the source to find a reference
66 matches
Mail list logo
