2014-10-25 10:29 GMT+07:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
I fixed small issue in regress tests and I enhanced tests for varlena
types and null values.
Thanks.
it is about 15% faster than original implementation.
15% faster than array_agg(scalar)? I haven't verify the performance, but
2014-10-25 8:19 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 10:29 GMT+07:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
I fixed small issue in regress tests and I enhanced tests for varlena
types and null values.
Thanks.
it is about 15% faster than original implementation.
15% faster than
2014-10-25 8:33 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 8:19 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 10:29 GMT+07:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
I fixed small issue in regress tests and I enhanced tests for varlena
types and null values.
Thanks.
it
makeArrayResult1 - I have no better name now
I found one next minor detail.
you reuse a array_agg_transfn function. Inside is a message
array_agg_transfn called in non-aggregate context. It is not correct for
array_agg_anyarray_transfn
Fixed.
probably specification dim and lbs in
2014-10-25 10:16 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
makeArrayResult1 - I have no better name now
I found one next minor detail.
you reuse a array_agg_transfn function. Inside is a message
array_agg_transfn called in non-aggregate context. It is not correct for
On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Marco Nenciarini marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it writes:
Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
you found.
Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what
seems to me to
2014-10-25 15:43 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 10:16 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
makeArrayResult1 - I have no better name now
I found one next minor detail.
you reuse a array_agg_transfn function. Inside is a message
array_agg_transfn called
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Ugh, you want to auto-magically detect what value is behind the EXCLUDED
based on how/where it's used in the UPDATE? That seems like quite a bad
idea.
That's *exactly* how DEFAULT works
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 10/24/14, 12:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
- What should we call dsm_unkeep_mapping, if not that?
Only option I can think of beyond unkeep would be
dsm_(un)register_keep_mapping. Dunno that it's
2014-10-25 12:20 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 15:43 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com:
2014-10-25 10:16 GMT+02:00 Ali Akbar the.ap...@gmail.com:
makeArrayResult1 - I have no better name now
I found one next minor detail.
you reuse a
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Dilip kumar dilip.ku...@huawei.com wrote:
On 26 September 2014 12:24, Amit Kapila Wrote,
I don't think this can handle cancel requests properly because
you are just setting it in GetIdleSlot() what if the cancel
request came during GetQueryResult() after
Thom Brown wrote:
On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Marco Nenciarini marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it writes:
Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends
you found.
Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion,
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
Not in this room. Do you?
I should have added some more context so that people realizes that this
room contains the 2ndQuadrant people involved in writing this patch.
Also I wanted
On 10/24/14 10:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Some clients (eg JDBC) don't support Unix-socket connections AFAIK, so
this seems like a rather restricted solution.
While this is a valid point, they're actually working on fixing that.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 10/24/14 9:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter, Dave: maybe you have tweaked things to keep listen_addresses
empty and rely only on Unix-socket connections?
I can confirm that I do get the popup when starting an installed
postmaster with the default settings.
Given that this doesn't affect make
you can check it? We can test, how performance lost we get. As second
benefit we can get numbers for introduction new optimized array builder
array_agg(anyarray) with deconstruct_array, unchanged accumArrayResult and
makeMdArrayResult:
INSERT 0 1
Time: 852,527 ms
INSERT 0 1
Time: 844,275
Hi,
There was recently talk about if we should start using 128-bit integers
(where available) to speed up the aggregate functions over integers
which uses numeric for their internal state. So I hacked together a
patch for this to see what the performance gain would be.
Previous thread:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
You're conflating the user-visible syntax with the parse tree
representation in way that is utterly without foundation. I don't
have a position at this point on which parse-analysis representation
is preferable, but it's
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:07:42PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I think instead of focusing on foreign keys, we should rewind a bit
and think about the locking level required to add a trigger.
Agreed.
On 25 October 2014 13:28, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Marco Nenciarini marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it writes:
Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose
ends
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Given that this doesn't affect make check anymore, I'm unsure about
this patch. There is a lot of magic in the configure change. I don't
know what to pass as the configure option argument, so can't really
evaluate that. I'd like to see an explanation
I wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Have we dug deep enough into the firewall configuration to evaluate
other options? Can we, for example, exclude a port range?
Not that I've been able to detect. Any simple way to do that would
presumably open up exactly the security hole
On 24 Oct 2014 20:28, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
You could perhaps try to create a command that would move a schema
between two databases in the same cluster. It's fraught with
practical difficulties because a single backend can't be connected to
both databases at the same
On 25 October 2014 19:19, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 25 October 2014 13:28, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Thom Brown wrote:
On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Marco Nenciarini marco.nenciar...@2ndquadrant.it writes:
Please find the
Hi Hackers,
I am thinking of a possible problem with shm_mq structure spin lock.
This is used for protecting the shm_mq structure.
During the processing of any code under the spin lock, if the process
receives SIGQUIT signal then it is leading to a dead lock situation.
I sometimes get the error snapshot too large from my logical
replication walsender process when in response to a CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT.
This is in SnapBuildExportSnapshot in snapbuild.c
newxcnt is 212 at that point
I have max_connections = 200
procArray-maxProcs=212
Should we be testing
My logical decoding plugin is occasionally getting this error
could not resolve cmin/cmax of catalog tuple
I get this when my output plugin is trying to read one of the user
defined catalog tables (user_catalog_table=true)
I am not sure if this is a bug in the time-travel support in the
Hi,
On 2014-10-26 08:52:42 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
I am thinking of a possible problem with shm_mq structure spin lock.
This is used for protecting the shm_mq structure.
During the processing of any code under the spin lock, if the process
receives SIGQUIT signal then it is leading to
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-10-26 08:52:42 +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
I am thinking of a possible problem with shm_mq structure spin lock.
This is used for protecting the shm_mq structure.
During the processing of any code
Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for the details. I am sorry It is not proc_exit. It is the exit
callback functions that can cause problem.
The following is the callstack where the problem can happen, if the signal
handler is called after the spin lock took by the
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Haribabu Kommi kommi.harib...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks for the details. I am sorry It is not proc_exit. It is the exit
callback functions that can cause problem.
The following is the callstack where the problem can happen,
On 10/25/14 2:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
And a bit of experimentation later: it seems that on Yosemite (and
probably earlier OS X versions), localhost maps to all three of these
addresses:
127.0.0.1
::1
fe80:1::1
Binding to 127.0.0.1 does not trigger the firewall popup.
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
On 10/25/14 2:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
And a bit of experimentation later: it seems that on Yosemite (and
probably earlier OS X versions), localhost maps to all three of these
addresses:
127.0.0.1
::1
fe80:1::1
Binding to 127.0.0.1 does not trigger
Tom,
I believe there are two main concerns that you raise, addressed below:
First:
It needs to be a more constrained syntax.
One possibility is to insist that the wildcard be only a part
of the name string, eg
[myservers-%]
host=%.domain.com
port=5433
user=admin
*
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
Argh, looks like I forgot the actual code changes required.
I just noticed that pg_controldata and pg_resetxlog don't check for extra
arguments:
$ pg_resetxlog data fds sdf sdf
Transaction log reset
I think
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Rajeev rastogi
rajeev.rast...@huawei.com wrote:
On 22 September 2014 19:17, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 09/22/2014 04:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes:
On 09/22/2014 07:47 AM, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
So my proposal
36 matches
Mail list logo
