Hi Team.
I would like to solve a problem of Allow access to the database via HTTP.
But before drawing up the demand in GSOC I wanted to consult here.
Therefore I will be grateful to comments from attendees here!
1. I think, will better use access to DB through the stand-alone program
which not
Michael Paquier wrote:
In AutoVacWorkerMain, I am reading the following:
* Currently, we don't pay attention to postgresql.conf changes that
* happen during a single daemon iteration, so we can ignore SIGHUP.
*/
pqsignal(SIGHUP, SIG_IGN);
So a worker
Hi all,
When working on extensions or packaging, one can do some grep-ing on
pg_config.h to get PG_VERSION_NUM to do version-related operations. An
example of that is the Makefile of plv8 using --include-dir with perl
and a regex:
https://github.com/plv8/plv8/blob/master/Makefile
Wouldn't it be
On 02/23/2015 04:01 PM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
I think you could remove renegotiation from PostgreSQL as long as you
offer something better than RC4 in the TLS handshake.
I'd say it is best to wait if and how OpenSSL change their API when they
implement TLS 1.3.
I'd vote against removing
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method
for 9.5, (smart to fast), [...]?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Michael Paquier wrote:
So a worker does not see changes in postgresql.conf once it is run and
processes a database, no? The launcher does run ProcessConfigFile()
when
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
On 03/22/2015 03:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
In a green field we might choose to solve this by refactoring the output
so that it's logically ...
but I think that ship has sailed.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
This time I've however checked the log, and what caught my eye is that
the last log message is from November. There were regular messages until
then (a few messages per day), but since Nov 19 there's nothing.
I'd
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We could
On 2015-03-23 10:25:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
recoveryApplyDelay() does:
TimestampDifference(GetCurrentTimestamp(), recoveryDelayUntilTime,
secs, microsecs);
if (secs = 0
Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi writes:
On 03/22/2015 03:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
In a green field we might choose to solve this by refactoring the output
so that it's logically ...
but I think that ship has sailed. Changing the logical structure of
EXPLAIN output like this would break
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Hm? We don't have scan nodes that read more than one table, so I'm
not following your point.
But in the text output you gave
Update on public.pt1 (cost=0.00..321.05
20 марта 2015 г., в 18:00, Vladimir Borodin r...@simply.name написал(а):
19 марта 2015 г., в 20:30, Sergey Shchukin shchukin@gmail.com
mailto:shchukin@gmail.com написал(а):
17.03.2015 13:22, Sergey Shchukin пишет:
05.03.2015 11:25, Jim Nasby пишет:
On 2/27/15 5:11 AM, Sergey
On 2015-03-20 08:41:38 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 03:52:38PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-11-17 11:51:54 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-10-25 18:09:36 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
I sometimes get the error
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Michael Paquier wrote:
So a worker does not see changes in postgresql.conf once it is run and
processes a database, no? The launcher does run ProcessConfigFile()
when SIGHUP shows up though.
Maybe this is something that we should change.
Yeah,
Ashutosh Bapat ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com writes:
I might be only one objecting here but ...
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
My Salesforce colleagues noticed some tests flapping as a result of table
CHECK constraints not always being enforced in the
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr wrote:
Hello Didier,
If fprintf takes p = 0.025 (1/40) of the time, then with 2 threads the
collision probability would be about 1/40 and the delayed thread would be
waiting for half this time on average, so the
The proposed format is much simpler to manage in a script, and if you're
interested in runtime, its formatting would be less expensive than %t and
%m.
Maybe, but do we really need two? How about just %M?
I guess Tomas put 2 formats because there was 2 time formats to begin
with, but
Hi Team.
I would like to solve a problem of Allow access to the database via HTTP.
But before drawing up the demand in GSOC I wanted to consult here.
Therefore I will be grateful to comments from attendees here!
1. I think, will better use access to DB through the stand-alone program
which not
Hi,
recoveryApplyDelay() does:
TimestampDifference(GetCurrentTimestamp(), recoveryDelayUntilTime,
secs, microsecs);
if (secs = 0 microsecs = 0)
break;
elog(DEBUG2, recovery apply delay %ld seconds, %d milliseconds,
secs, microsecs / 1000);
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
recoveryApplyDelay() does:
TimestampDifference(GetCurrentTimestamp(), recoveryDelayUntilTime,
secs, microsecs);
if (secs = 0 microsecs = 0)
break;
elog(DEBUG2,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:36:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:46:08PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
I recommend adding a configure test to use our snprintf.c replacements if
sprintf(%.*f, 65536, 999.0) gives unexpected output.
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= fabriziome...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
We could fix it by, say, having CheckConstraintFetch() sort the
constraints by name after loading them.
Isn't better do this to read pg_constraint in
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Yeah, checking for SIGHUP in the worker outer loop (ie once per table)
seems like a reasonable thing.
Could it be done more often? Maybe every time it is about to do a
cost_delay
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Kevin Grittner kgri...@ymail.com wrote:
Jim Nasby jim.na...@bluetreble.com wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
OK, are we up for
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Etsuro Fujita fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp writes:
[ fdw-inh-8.patch ]
I've committed this with some substantial rearrangements, notably:
I'm
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Rajeev rastogi
rajeev.rast...@huawei.com wrote:
The cost of re-scan of SeqScan node is considered to be same scan of SeqScan
node, which always assumes that the records is fetched from disk and hence
disk access cost is added (As we don’t know really how much
Hi
2015-03-15 16:09 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
other variant, I hope better than previous. We can introduce new long
option --strict. With this active option, every pattern specified by -t
option have to have identifies exactly
On 2015-03-23 13:01:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
version was posted in December.
I think it fairly can be marked as returned with feedback for now?
On 2015-03-23 14:19:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-03-23 13:01:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
version was posted in
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:58 AM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Peter I don't really buy it, either way. In what sense is a NULL value
Peter ever abbreviated? It isn't. Whatever about the cost model,
Peter that's the truth of the matter. There is always going to be a
of situation, I generally post my
patch with a name like topicofthepatch-rmh-v1.patch or
topicofthepatch-rmh-20150323.patch, putting my initials in there to
show that this is my version of the patch, not the original author's
and that it may or may not be endorsed by the original author. Having
26
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
As
+ * with IEEE-754, we use an exponent without a sign (a 7-bit exponent
+ * without a sign).
As to the beginning of this sentence, bringing IEEE-754 into this
discussion doesn't clarify anything in my mind. I don't
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
However, there's a difference between making a query silently given
different results, and breaking it completely forcing the user to
re-study how to write it. I think the latter is better. In that light
we
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, Andrew's version is far clearer. Peter's version is
full of jargon that I can't understand. I could probably figure it
out with a few hours and a search engine, but that really shouldn't be
necessary.
Michael == Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
Michael Hi all,
Michael When working on extensions or packaging, one can do some
Michael grep-ing on pg_config.h to get PG_VERSION_NUM to do
Michael version-related operations. An example of that is the Makefile
Michael of plv8
On March 23, 2015 8:00:04 PM GMT+01:00, Fabien COELHO coe...@cri.ensmp.fr
wrote:
Guys, I don't see this theoretical discussion going anywhere. I think
it's time to simply implement this and evaluate it on a bigger
machine.
Sure. I was kind of hoping that someone else would implement it,
to the same problem. In this type of situation, I generally post my
patch with a name like topicofthepatch-rmh-v1.patch or
topicofthepatch-rmh-20150323.patch, putting my initials in there to
show that this is my version of the patch, not the original author's
and that it may or may not be endorsed
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, Andrew's version is far clearer. Peter's version is
full of jargon that I can't understand. I could probably figure it
out with a
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinn...@iki.fi wrote:
If we have promised that, I think we should break the promise. No
application should depend on the details of EXPLAIN output, even if it's in
JSON/YAML/XML format. EXPLAIN is used by humans, and by tools like pgAdmin
During my routine work, I observed that incase of execution of plan having
inner node of NLJ as materialized node (on top of SeqScan) is slower compared
to non-materialized SeqScan node. This happens only if Work_mem is not big
enough to hold all tuples in memory.
To make test easy and faster,
On 03/22/2015 03:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
In a green field we might choose to solve this by refactoring the output
so that it's logically
Multi-Table Update
[
Update Target: pt1
Plan: (seq scan on pt1 here)
]
On 23.3.2015 19:52, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Not sure how that's supposed to improve the situation? Also, when you
change the status to 'stalled', it only makes it more difficult to
identify why it was stalled
On 03/23/2015 02:32 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Oh, right. Yes, tracking time since the last status change like this
might be useful, although my experience is that many patches are stuck
at some status yet there was a long discussion on the list ... Not sure
if that counts as 'stalled'.
Time
On 2015-03-22 12:54:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 03/22/2015 06:45 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
FWIW, I think that's a myth. One I heard various versions of by now. As
long as the OSs page size (4kb nearly everywhere) is different from
postgres' (8kb) you can have torn pages. Even if
On 3/21/15 12:49 PM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
Frankly, I think the whole proposal needs to be rethought with an eye
towards supporting and preserving nested elements instead of trying to
just flatten everything out.
Can you pls show me few examples what do you mean exactly?
All the comments
On 3/22/15 2:59 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 22.3.2015 20:25, Fabien COELHO wrote:
The proposed format is much simpler to manage in a script, and if you're
interested in runtime, its formatting would be less expensive than %t
and
%m.
Maybe, but do we really need two? How about just %M?
I
Peter == Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
Peter As I said, I don't really consider that my patch is a rewrite,
Peter especially V4, which changes nothing substantive except removing
Peter 32-bit support.
Well, that's a hell of an except.
Here's my main arguments for why 32bit support
On 23.3.2015 23:02, Jim Nasby wrote:
On 3/22/15 2:59 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 22.3.2015 20:25, Fabien COELHO wrote:
I guess Tomas put 2 formats because there was 2 time formats
to begin with, but truncating/rouding if someone really wants
seconds is quite easy.
Yes, that's why I added
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world: tested, passed
Implements feature: tested, passed
Spec compliant: not tested
Documentation:not tested
Note that pgcrypto is failing 3 tests, same as in master.
The new
On 23.3.2015 18:30, Andres Freund wrote:
I think it fairly can be marked as returned with feedback for
now?
That will eventually be the end result, yes. If it's time to do that
now, or leave the patch in the CF and only bounce it at the end, I don't
know.
... which means that no useful
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Peter As I said, I don't really consider that my patch is a rewrite,
Peter especially V4, which changes nothing substantive except removing
Peter 32-bit support.
Well, that's a hell of an except.
I guess
On 23.3.2015 22:53, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Tomas Vondra
Sorry, the 23/2 one is the one I meant. I got confused over which of
the emails listed as having an attachment but no patch was the one that
actually had a patch. (If the commitfest app can't correctly
Hi
2015-03-22 23:28 GMT+01:00 Вадим Горбачев bmsd...@gmail.com:
Hi Team.
I would like to solve a problem of Allow access to the database via
HTTP.
But before drawing up the demand in GSOC I wanted to consult here.
Therefore I will be grateful to comments from attendees here!
1. I think,
Hi,
Guys, I don't see this theoretical discussion going anywhere. I think
it's time to simply implement this and evaluate it on a bigger
machine. It can't take very long to implement tosimply just write to one
file instead of the multiple files as now. The posix guaranteed fprintf
locking should
Hello,
Yes but for a third thread (each on a physical core) it will be 1/40 +
1/40 and so on up to roughly 40/40 for 40 cores.
That is why I proposed a formula which depends on the number of threads.
[...] But they aren't constant only close. It may or not show up in this
case but I've
Thanks for the review, Abhijit.
On 3/23/15 1:31 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2015-02-24 11:22:41 -0500, da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
Patch v3 is attached.
+
+/* Function execution */
+LOG_MISC = (1 5),
The comment above LOG_MISC should be changed.
Fixed.
More fundamentally,
What is a benefit of this implementation for Postgres community?
It will be possible to clean this task from
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
It can be interesting as well integrated project to Postgres -
implemented in C as background worker (if it possible)
I.e. as I understand http_api
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
However, there's a difference between making a query silently given
different results, and breaking it completely forcing the user to
as prompted to me, already there are solutions of this task: pgrest and
OpenResty
Then it isn't clear why this task is in TODO the sheet
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo...
Prompt what exactly is understood as Allow access to the database via
HTTP?
From what party to approach this task?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
version was posted in December. The fact that the new CommitFest
application
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
The substance of the code is unchanged from my original patch. I didn't
add diagnostic output to numeric_abbrev_abort, see my separate post
about the suggestion of a GUC for that.
I don't think that V2 really
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-03-23 13:01:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
version was posted in December.
I think it fairly can be marked as returned with
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is pretty lousy. The reasons why the user wants things
that way is because they created a UNIQUE index and it got bloated
somehow with lots of dead tuples. So they made a new UNIQUE index on
the same
Hi,
On 23.3.2015 18:01, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
However, there's a difference between making a query silently given
different results, and breaking it completely forcing the user to
re-study how to write it. I think
Hi,
On 23.3.2015 18:07, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
version was posted in December.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
On 01/31/2015 01:49 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
The refactoring patch certainly looks very reasonable.
Ok, committed the refactoring part for now. Thanks for the review.
Where are we on the rest of this, Heikki?
Sawada Masahiko wrote:
I tied to look into latest patch, but got following error.
masahiko [pg_audit] $ LANG=C make
gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing
-fwrapv -g
Guys, I don't see this theoretical discussion going anywhere. I think
it's time to simply implement this and evaluate it on a bigger
machine.
Sure. I was kind of hoping that someone else would implement it, because
I'm a reviewer on this one, and I do not have the bigger machine at hand
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:40 AM, David Steele da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
Thanks for the review, Abhijit.
On 3/23/15 1:31 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2015-02-24 11:22:41 -0500, da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
Patch v3 is attached.
+
+/* Function execution */
+LOG_MISC = (1 5),
thanks for information!
I understood your idea.
I originally assumed such structure:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4zY7CurvRqwWE9EZUpBU1FpSTQ/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4zY7CurvRqwSWpCRjlNVWdlMWc/view?usp=sharing
On 03/14/2015 02:31 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
Getting below linking error with Asserts enabled in Windows build.
1xlogreader.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
ExceptionalCondition referenced in function
XLogReadRecord
1.\Debug\pg_rewind\pg_rewind.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1
On 3/23/15 1:39 PM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:40 AM, David Steele da...@pgmasters.net wrote:
I have prepared a patch that brings event triggers and deparse back to
pg_audit based on the Alvaro's dev/deparse branch at
git://git.postgresql.org/git/2ndquadrant_bdr.git
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Tomas Vondra
tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Not sure how that's supposed to improve the situation? Also, when you
change the status to 'stalled', it only makes it more difficult to
identify why it was stalled (was it waiting for author or a review?).
On 23.3.2015 18:08, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
There was a patch here, which in the commit fest is hidden behind
other non-attachments in the same email:
Attachment (randomize.sql
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
The earlier comment should make it clear that all the DEC_DIGITS != 4
support is historical. I didn't consider it appropriate to actually
rip out all the #ifs; I simply tried to make it clear where the
landmines
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:06:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I have updated the attached patch to do as you suggested. Please also
test the \x output. Thanks.
Indeed. If I use a specific column name like this one, I am seeing
problems with the expanded mode:
=# create table 5
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, not committing the patch at all would be even less invasive.
But that's true of any patch, so I don't think being less invasive can
be the prime goal. Of course it's usually better to be less invasive
and get the
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Michael == Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
Michael Hi all,
Michael When working on extensions or packaging, one can do some
Michael grep-ing on pg_config.h to get PG_VERSION_NUM to do
Peter == Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
Peter Your V3 has obsolete comments here:
Peter + nss = palloc(sizeof(NumericSortSupport));
Peter +
Peter + /*
Peter + * palloc a buffer for handling unaligned packed values in addition to
Peter + * the support struct
Peter + */
Peter +
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I must also admit that I am somewhat annoyed here, since Andrew has
questioned essentially ever revision I've proposed to both of the sort
support patches he wrote, and in a rather bellicose way. They were
mostly very
On 3/23/15 12:42 AM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
Hi,
Assuming that this might require a patch, i am posting this in
pgsql-hackers. Apologies, if this is not the appropriate mailing list to
start this discussion.
I performed a PITR and saw the below message in the log file is a bit
confusing.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with you. Fewer and fewer people are running 32-bit systems
these days, but there must surely be more people running 32-bit
systems than there are running with DEC_DIGITS != 4. I think it's a
stretch to say
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with you. Fewer and fewer people are running 32-bit systems
these days, but there must surely be more people running 32-bit
systems than
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Gierth
and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk wrote:
Peter == Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com writes:
Peter As I said, I don't really consider that my patch is a rewrite,
Peter especially V4, which changes nothing substantive except removing
Peter 32-bit
Michael == Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com writes:
MAJORVERSION is defined in Makefile.global as included by PGXS, fwiw.
Michael Well, my point is to have something on which you can directly
Michael apply maths on without changing its shape ;)
There's this trick:
# if version
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Michael Paquier wrote:
So a worker does not see changes in postgresql.conf once it is run and
processes a database, no? The launcher does run ProcessConfigFile()
when SIGHUP
On 23 March 2015 21:39, Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Rajeev rastogi
rajeev.rast...@huawei.com wrote:
The cost of re-scan of SeqScan node is considered to be same scan of
SeqScan node, which always assumes that the records is fetched from
disk and hence disk access cost is
On 2015/03/20 21:31, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 06:29:07PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I don't think that the lock level mentioned in the following comment in
MergeAttributes() in tablecmds.c is right, since that that function has
opened the relation with
On 2015/03/21 5:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 08:30:49PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
(2014/11/13 20:07), Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 11/13/2014 12:45 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
It seems to me there are typos in the reference page for CREATE TABLE.
The structure of the
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Notice the added 'l' next to the ''. Updated patch attached. Any
other issues?
Ah, right. That's a good catch and your patch fixes the issue. Still,
there are problems with the tuple-only mode and the expanded mode. For
example using this
On 2015/03/23 2:57, Tom Lane wrote:
I've committed this with some substantial rearrangements, notably:
Thanks for taking the time to committing the patch!
Thanks for the work, Hanada-san! And thank you everyone for the reviews
and comments, especially Ashutosh, Horiguchi-san and Noah!
* I
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, not committing the patch at all would be even less invasive.
But that's true of any patch, so I don't think being less invasive can
be the
93 matches
Mail list logo
