On 05/23/2015 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:16:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
- if (IsA(node, Aggref) || IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
+ if (IsA(node, Aggref) ||IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
There's a bunch of changes like this. Looks
Hi Jeff and all,
On 23/05/15 22:13, Jeff Janes wrote:
Are you sure it is the read IO that causes the problem?
Yes. Trouble is here that we are talking about a 361 GB table
List of relations
Schema |Name | Type | Owner |Size
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 05/23/2015 11:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
No, pgindent has *always* been wonky about lines that contain a typedef
name but are not variable declarations.
Well, that sounds like something we should try to patch, doesn't it?
(No, I'm not volunteering.)
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:37:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 04:16:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
- if (IsA(node, Aggref) || IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
+ if (IsA(node, Aggref) ||IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
There's a bunch of
Christoph Berg m...@debian.org writes:
Re: To Andres Freund 2015-05-24 20150524075244.gb27...@msg.df7cb.de
Re: Andres Freund 2015-05-24 20150524005245.gd32...@alap3.anarazel.de
How about, to avoid masking actual problems, we have a more
differentiated logic for the toplevel data directory?
Re: To Andres Freund 2015-05-24 20150524075244.gb27...@msg.df7cb.de
Re: Andres Freund 2015-05-24 20150524005245.gd32...@alap3.anarazel.de
How about, to avoid masking actual problems, we have a more
differentiated logic for the toplevel data directory? I think we could
just skip all
On 05/24/2015 03:17 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
This change really makes this set of jsonb features quite a bit more
compelling. I'm glad I thought of it - wish I had done so earlier. So
notwithstanding the controversy
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
This change really makes this set of jsonb features quite a bit more
compelling. I'm glad I thought of it - wish I had done so earlier. So
notwithstanding the controversy upthread, I think this is a good result.
I think
postgres_fdw supports ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING, provided no inference
specification is provided. Foreign tables do not have associated
unique indexes (or exclusion constraints) as far as the optimizer is
concerned, and so Postgres does not accept an inference specification
for foreign tables -- the
On 2015-05-24 19:44:37 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Buildfarm members casteroides and protosciurus have been having some
problems that seem puzzling. These animals both run on the same machine, but
with different compilers.
casteroides runs with the Sun Studio 12 compiler, and has twice in
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
As things stand, every other possible ON CONFLICT clause will throw an
error in some way before the FDW is consulted at all, so FDW authors
need not concern themselves with those other cases (unless perhaps we
allow ON
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-24 12:17:35 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
Having gone to the trouble of making the parser support this stuff (in
a way that makes us not follow the SQL standard in a couple of
places), we ought to have a similar capability for jsonb. I
Buildfarm members casteroides and protosciurus have been having some
problems that seem puzzling. These animals both run on the same machine,
but with different compilers.
casteroides runs with the Sun Studio 12 compiler, and has twice in the
last 3 days demonstrated this error:
On 2015-05-24 12:17:35 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
Having gone to the trouble of making the parser support this stuff (in
a way that makes us not follow the SQL standard in a couple of
places), we ought to have a similar capability for jsonb. I haven't
looked into it, but it seems like a
On 05/24/2015 05:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2015-05-24 12:17:35 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
Having gone to the trouble of making the parser support this stuff (in
a way that makes us not follow the SQL standard in a couple of
places), we ought to have
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
AddForeignUpdateTargets() actually won't be called with ON CONFLICT DO
UPDATE, and so it isn't exactly true that the only obstacle to making
FDWs support ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE is around inference of arbiter
unique indexes
Just a merge after pgindent run (807b9e0dff663c5da875af7907a5106c0ff90673).
psql-ev-sv-support-v3.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Andres Freund 2015-05-24 20150524005245.gd32...@alap3.anarazel.de
How about, to avoid masking actual problems, we have a more
differentiated logic for the toplevel data directory? I think we could
just skip all non-directory files in there data_directory itself. None
of the files in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
