On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Munro
wrote:
> I also have longer term plans to show the first and third of them
> running with the read-only transaction moved to a standby server.
> Kevin Grittner gave me the idea of multi-server isolation tests when I
> mentioned my WIP SERIALIZABLE DEFE
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Amit Khandekar wrote:
> Thanks Ashutosh for the feedback.
>
> On 6 January 2017 at 17:04, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Amit Khandekar
>> wrote:
>>> Currently an Append plan node does not execute its subplans in
>>> parallel. There
On 2017/01/14 13:36, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related
>>> feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> I do have a question here regards code formatting.
> The patch now contains:
>
> if (log_filepath == NULL)
> {
> /* Bad data. Avoid segfaults etc. and return NULL to caller. */
> break;
> }
>
> I'm not sure how this
On 13 January 2017 at 19:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think this is the same problem as reported in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU=1yE4YyCC00W_GcNoOZ4X2qxF7x5DUAR_kMt-Ta=ypy...@mail.gmail.com
Ah yes, this is the same problem. Not sure why I didn't land on that
thread when I tried
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Antonin Houska wrote:
>> > Attached is a draft patch that lets partial aggregation happen at base
>> > relation level. If the relations contain relatively small number of groups,
>
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut
wrote:
> On 1/11/17 11:20 AM, Ryan Murphy wrote:
>> Thanks for the review Beena, I'm glad the patch is ready to go!
>
> committed, thanks
Sorry for speaking up late.
This change may confuse the users who run "pg_ctl start" to perform a crash
rec
Thanks Ashutosh for the feedback.
On 6 January 2017 at 17:04, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Amit Khandekar
> wrote:
>> Currently an Append plan node does not execute its subplans in
>> parallel. There is no distribution of workers across its subplans. The
>> second s
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 07:20:40 -0600
"Karl O. Pinc" wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:54:44 +0900
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > I think that's all I have for this patch.
> I'd like to submit with it an addendum patch that
> makes symbols out of some constants. I'll see if I can
> get that done
On 2016-10-31 09:06:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-09-14 19:28:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> > > On 2016-09-12 19:35:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Here's a draft patch that is just meant to investigate what the planner
> > changes might look like if we do it in th
On 2017/01/14 6:39, Jeff Janes wrote:
I've tested this patch against
9.6.stable-2d443ae1b0121e15265864d2b21 and 10.dev-0563a3a8b59150bf3cc8,
and in both cases it fixes the original problem.
Thanks for testing!
I do get a compiler warning:
foreign.c: In function 'CreateLocalJoinPath':
foreign
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Michael Paquier
>> wrote:
>>> Do you think that expanding the wait query by default could be
>>> intrusive for the other tests? I am wondering about
On 15/01/17 23:57, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-01-15 23:20, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
>> 0001-Add-PUBLICATION-catalogs-and-DDL-v18.patch
>> 0002-Add-SUBSCRIPTION-catalog-and-DDL-v18.patch
>> 0003-Define-logical-replication-protocol-and-output-plugi-v18.patch
>> 0004-Add-logical-replication-workers-v
On 2017-01-15 23:20, Petr Jelinek wrote:
0001-Add-PUBLICATION-catalogs-and-DDL-v18.patch
0002-Add-SUBSCRIPTION-catalog-and-DDL-v18.patch
0003-Define-logical-replication-protocol-and-output-plugi-v18.patch
0004-Add-logical-replication-workers-v18.patch
0005-Add-separate-synchronous-commit-control
> Yes, but it was related to the idea of having `ArrayRef` and `JsonbRef` nodes
> for specific types. Since now there is generic `SubscriptingRef` node, I think
> it should be ok.
Sorry I misunderstood it.
> Just to be clear - as far as I understood, these compilation problems were
> caused not b
Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git
wiki[2], but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that
technique. In short, if you're already in your checkout:
git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE
would give you a checkout of 9.6 in the ../9.6 directory.
BTW
On 15/01/17 20:20, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On 15-01-2017 15:13, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> I am not quite sure I agree with this. Either it's system object and we
>> don't replicate it (which I would have considered to be anything with
>> Oid < FirstNormalObjectId) or it's user made and then it should b
On 15-01-2017 15:13, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I am not quite sure I agree with this. Either it's system object and we
> don't replicate it (which I would have considered to be anything with
> Oid < FirstNormalObjectId) or it's user made and then it should be
> replicated. Filtering by schema name is I
Michael Paquier writes:
> Bah. I was sure I was missing something, still I would have thought
> that the index scan is cheaper than the bitmap index scan with ORDER
> BY. As far as I can see, this patch is not the most elegant thing, but
> it has value. So marked as "ready for committer".
Pushed,
On 06/01/17 21:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 0005-Add-separate-synchronous-commit-control-for-logical--v16.patch.gz
>
> This looks a little bit hackish. I'm not sure how this would behave
> properly when either synchronous_commit or
> logical_replication_synchronous_commit is changed at run time
On 11/01/17 22:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/11/17 3:35 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 11/01/17 18:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 1/11/17 3:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Okay, looking into my notes, I originally did this because we did not
allow adding tables without pkeys to publica
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:54:44 +0900
Michael Paquier wrote:
> I think that's all I have for this patch.
I'd like to submit with it an addendum patch that
makes symbols out of some constants. I'll see if I can
get that done soon.
Karl
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
Hi
2016-12-28 3:50 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut :
> Updated patch attached.
>
> The previous round of reviews showed that there was general agreement on
> the approach. So I have focused on filling in the gaps, added ICU
> support to all the locale-using places, added documentation, fixed some
> m
Le 15/01/2017 à 06:54, Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Gilles Darold
> wrote:
>> Le 13/01/2017 à 14:09, Michael Paquier a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Gilles Darold
>>> wrote:
Le 13/01/2017 à 05:26, Michael Paquier a écrit :
> Surely the tem
24 matches
Mail list logo
