On 2016-10-31 09:06:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-09-14 19:28:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On 2016-09-12 19:35:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Here's a draft patch that is just meant to investigate what the planner > > changes might look like if we do it in the pipelined-result way. > > Accordingly, I didn't touch the executor, but just had it emit regular > > Result nodes for SRF-execution steps. However, the SRFs are all > > guaranteed to appear at top level of their respective tlists, so that > > those Results could be replaced with something that works like > > nodeFunctionscan. > > > So I think we should continue investigating this way of doing things. > > I'll try to take a look at the executor end of it tomorrow. However > > I'm leaving Friday for a week's vacation, and may not have anything to > > show before that. > > Are you planning to work on the execution side of things? I otherwise > can take a stab...
Doing so now. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
