orking Services
(http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy
ICQ: 7615664
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
Due to the new qsort() in 713UP3.
LER
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Pho
eir own? I
know that Linux is not using BSD TCP/IP (or, at least, they didn't in
their first 3 incarnations of the stack) ...
M$ also bought a LARGE license from SCO...
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
uently, and this time I didn't know when,
exactly, SCO would make the release of the updated compiler.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 7504
one character in a field name, and I wasn't
paying attention :-) )
LER
Chris
Larry Rosenman wrote:
I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have.
I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet.
Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back?
LER
--
Larry Rosenman
--On Monday, November 17, 2003 19:36:08 -0600 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have.
I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet.
Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back?
Actually, I got lucky. pg_catalog.pg_attrib
I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have.
I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet.
Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back?
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US
--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 13:15:27 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is it repeatable? It's hard to see how _bt_getroot() could core
except maybe in the presence of serious data corruption in the index ...
it happened o
--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 12:59:43 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I got the following:
$ debug -ic -c core* /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres
Warning: No debugging information in /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres
Core image
0d]
[2] _bt_first(presumed: 0x83853d8, 0x1, 0x8385400) [0x809443e]
[3] btgettuple() [0x8091fa6]
debug>
It's a one shot, and I have a core, but, I don't have the debug symbols
as UnixWare's cc doesn't allow -g and -O.
Do we care?
--
Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 23:09:15 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just updated to the current REL7_4_STABLE cvs, and get
a problem at line 18048 where cat isn't on the path writing
the config.status file.
If I add
I just updated to the current REL7_4_STABLE cvs, and get
a problem at line 18048 where cat isn't on the path writing
the config.status file.
If I add /usr/bin/ to the cat invocation, it works.
What's broke?
(I updated using:
cvs update -rREL7_4_STABLE -P -d
)
LER
--
Larr
--On Thursday, November 13, 2003 13:18:31 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The only thing I'm aware of is the setsockopt() issue on OpenServer.
We have no proposed patch for that, either, so it will also have to
wait for
of is the setsockopt() issue on OpenServer.
LER
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
--On Monday, November 10, 2003 13:40:24 -0500 Neil Conway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You might also look at Veritas' advisory stuff.
Thanks for the suggestion -- it looks like we can make use of
this. For the curious, the cach
ropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Dr
Can I get a comment from someone on this please...
LER
--On Saturday, November 08, 2003 18:03:45 -0600 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my SCO contacts re: the failure on OSR5:
I haven't had time and won't have time to fully diagnose this until
after
st says if you're on OpenServer
then don't do the setsockopt calls. Not very satisfactory as setsockopt
should work on OSR5.
I know this isn't an acceptable patch, and I'm not sure when my contact
is back from Vacation.
Do we want to hold the release?
LER
--
Larry Ros
--On Thursday, November 06, 2003 20:19:05 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A "make check" fails at createdb with errors in the postmaster logfile:
LOG: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY) failed: Protocol not available
[snip]
Bett
ot;-b elf" argument.
Anyone of the guru's have ideas?
Thanks,
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I know is still the default on IBM Mainframes (been 5+
years but...).
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On Monday, November 03, 2003 00:36:41 -0600 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We pass all tests except for the Join test now. the join test seems to
just be row-ordering from qsort():
test union... ok
test case ... ok
tes
| 2 | 3 | two | 4
+ | 2 | 3 | two | 2
| 3 | 2 | three | -3
| 4 | 1 | four |
| 5 | 0 | five | -5
==
$
Can we mark UnixWare ok for 7.4 with these? Or re-write the test to NOT
fail?
LER
--
Larr
priate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs
--On Friday, October 31, 2003 16:49:17 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
*** ./expected/union.outThu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003
--- ./results/union.out Fri Oct 31 15:15:50 2003
***
*** 106,112
two
-
2 | three | -3
| 4 | 1 | four |
| 5 | 0 | five | -5
--- 1815,1822
-+---+---+---+
| 0 | | zero |
| 1 | 4 | one | -1
| 2 | 3 | two | 4
+ | 2 | 3 | two | 2
| 3 | 2 | three | -3
| 4 | 1 | four |
| 5 | 0 | five | -5
==
iler to allow us to conditionally remove the -Kno_host for
the fixed compiler into 7.4?
It would be a good thing. (UP3 came out yesterday).
LER
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
-
I didn't see this come back in, so, I'm resending it.
LER
Forwarded Message
Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 22:26:43 -0600
From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: SCO relea
le. As the code stands, they
cannot.
It seems to me that a superuser SHOULD be able to affect ANY permissions on
ANY object in the DB.
[snip]
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Spring
--On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:49:53 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
--On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 15:26:39 -0500 Tom Lane=20
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Is this a bug, or is it correct-per-spec behavior? It&
unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ission denied for language sql
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION regressuser3;
SELECT testfunc1(5); -- fail
ERROR: permission denied for function testfunc1
--- 247,252
======
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.ler
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 22:29:04 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman writes:
*** ./expected/privileges.out Thu Oct 9 20:49:31 2003
--- ./results/privileges.outSat Oct 25 12:04:45 2003
***
*** 247,253
(1 row)
CREATE FU
testfunc1
--- 247,252
==
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Larry Rosenman
--On Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:14:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> After further consideration, I think that the recent patch series that
>> tried to centralize the CFLAGS handling in configure should be
>> reverted to con
do CFLAGS="-O" and be done with it because we
would not be bringing in the -O2, but I would rather keep it clean and
remove just -O2.
We also get -g on UnixWare cc (NOT gcc) builds, which we didn't before,
which means we do NOT get optimization (UnixWare's cc doesn't like
-O
are lerami 5 7.1.3 i386 x86at SCO UNIX_SVR5
$
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ludes=/usr/local/include --with-libs=/usr/local/lib \
--with-tcl --with-tclconfig=/usr/local/lib \
--with-tkconfig=/usr/local/lib --enable-locale \
--enable-thread-safety
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Ma
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROT
moth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
---(end of broadcast)--
applies to 'postgres'
!-postgres
"
a more standard (non-FreeBSD specific) answer is:
local0.*/var/log/postgres.log
(this also works on FreeBSD, btw).
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
ailing list cleanly
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
r's.
Don't ASSUME that we don't do stuff like this with a database.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Since I haven't gotten a reply, can someone REVERT the lines in
src/Makefile.shlib that adds $(libdir)/$(soname) for
port,eq,unixware to $(soname)?
I need to look harder.
Thanks!
--On Saturday, September 13, 2003 15:47:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With
g to help?
I didn't notice the problem since I have a 7.4 install in my normal prefix.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:30:38 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Wow, that is strange. Someone else told me NetBSD supports threads,
> and doesn't need any special compile flags, but of course, it has to
> have pthread.
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 13:03:33 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 12:18:52 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I need someone running NetBSD to rea
No such file or directory
$ locate pthread.h
$
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
sent the details to Tom, since he seems to be the spinlock maintainer.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.
Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
an implicit #define of _
--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:00:43 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please, only the first two. Make the Unixware template add __i386__.
Don't add assumptions about valid user-namespace symbols.
that's reasonab
pace symbols.
that's reasonable. At least until 64-bit UnixWare. :-)
(announced at SCOForum).
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.htm
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 23:13:54 -0400 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If
y'all= =20
care).
Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?
I'm actu
v7.4, with the "cleanup patch" being applied right away after
v7.4?
Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all
care).
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
_r(
3), setpassent(3), setpwent(3), endpwent(3) - password database operations
$
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:52:18 -0700 Stephan Szabo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> /usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all
> gmake[3]: Entering dire
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 14:19:00 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Sunday, September 07, 2003 20:22:30 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
/usr/local/bin/gmake -C libpq all
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/pgsql/src/backend/libpq'
cc
t;." must be struct/union object UX:acomp: WARNING: "ip.c", line 465: left
operand of "." must be struct/union object UX:acomp: WARNING: "ip.c",
line 466: left operand of "." must be struct/union object UX:acomp:
line 416 is:
int32 s_addr;
s_add
t now? It would seem to me to be a good thing(tm) to
have
it in.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be related *shrug*
let me know if it happens again, that's all ...
Will do. Thanks for the fix(es).
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Spring
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 13:39:44 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 15:35:48 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
k, which file specifically are you expecting a change in? as I said, the
changes t
ckout and see if that helps ... ?
The src/tools/test_thread stuff,
Added files:
>> >> src/tools : test_thread_funcs.c
>> >>
I'll try a full checkout.
LER
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
I still did NOT pick up any changes :-(
Would you like a
o obtain dir lock in repository
`/projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server'
cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up
$
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> everythin
Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 14:44:07 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> k, I just wipe'd out and rebuild /projects/cvsroot, and it looks like
> the files are in sync again ... I checked abased on the plt
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 23:34:09 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 01:26:29 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
everything looks okay on teh server ...the script is set to run hourly,
and ther
just manually ran it .. did that help?
Nope. I'm still not seeing Bruce's changes for the threads stuff nor the
added tools
files.
:-(
LER
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there.
I'm doing:
cvs update -d -P
(
Today's commits from Bruce don't seem to be there.
I'm doing:
cvs update -d -P
(I sent another note to Marc as a safety).
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboa
Can you pass me what's in CVS (anon hasn't updated afaict).
And, what didn't you like about my version?
LER
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 18:35:44 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > What does your OS want for the 3rd ar
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> From UnixWare:
$ cc -O -Kpthread test_thread.c -o test_thread -lsocket -lnsl
UX:acomp: WARNING: "test_thread.c", line 60: argument #3 incompatible
with protot
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 17:09:49 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > From UnixWare:
>>
>>
In hindsight, I should have done this long ago. However, it only tests
the thread-safety of functions. It does not completely test your
threading capability.
I would like every operating system that supports thread-safety to run
this program and report back the results.
--
Larry Rose
--On Wednesday, September 03, 2003 14:00:55 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > Woh, I thought we just agreed that getpwuid_r() isn't required for
>> > thread-safety on your platform.
>> it's CLEANER to use it.
&
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:32:03 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> >> > Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that
>> >> > the normal function i
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 18:12:48 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 19:53:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee Kindness writes:
>
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> >
nabled
on UnixWare with only the getpwuid_r() function?
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
---(end of broadcast)-
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:35:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:20:14 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Lee Kindness writes:
>>
>&
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:32:08 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Where does it say that you have to use getpwuid_r() to be thread safe?
> I don't see any mention in the docs. It does say about getpwuid:
>
> For getpw
with
three functions, to it should be doable.
Right. We can't assume because a *_r function is missing that the
normal function is thread-safe.
So, given that UnixWare doesn't have gethostbyname_r and strerror_r, but
does have
getpwuid_r, will y'all declare that Uni
--On Tuesday, September 02, 2003 00:04:35 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> > Oh, interesting. So you are saying that if the OS supports threads,
>> > then we use the *_r if they have them, and assume the non *_r
>> > fun
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 22:02:00 +0100 Lee Kindness
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
then how do we *PROVE* thread-safety on a particular platform?
You're not going to be able to prove it anyway!
which is my poin
ut with my
patch it does build.
LER
regards, tom lane
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
---(end of broadcast)-
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 14:24:14 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 13:11:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Monday, September 01, 2003 12:35:43 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Um. I don't think that's true. I mean, in theory it'
ues.
That sounds like a clear plan.
I have no preference. I would just like to see a thread-safe libpq.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Dri
.
www A 194.250.190.252
www2
--On Sunday, August 31, 2003 15:27:19 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Looks like Marc's script removed it
$ cd /var/adm/named/cache
$ grep ftp.fr postgresql.org
$ ls -l postgresql.org
-rw-r--r--1 root sys
RIGIN postgresql.org.
$
--On Sunday, August 31, 2003 22:18:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a problem with DNS? a few hours ago, www.fr.postgresql.org was
not defined, now that it works again, ftp.fr.postgresql.org dosn't exist
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerct
this will allow us to NOT have to muck with
LD_LIBRARY_PATH
nor symlinks out of /usr/lib/
These are against today's CVS.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Driv
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:51:01 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
> thread-safe, and some are not. I have to determine if we have other
> such platforms before I
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:17:41 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 01:09:54 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'K, but why the change to NEEDS_REENTRANT_FUNC_NA
need a configure check to set HAVE_GETPWUID_R, so we will
use getpwuid_r in the ENABLE_THREADS case.
UnixWare does NOT have strerror_r nor does it have gethostbyname_r, and the
libc versions are reentrant in libc, for those 2. We need to use
getpwuid_r for
threaded apps.
Does this clarify thin
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:57:45 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Index: src/port/thread.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:35:10 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 00:19:49 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So be it, bu
nt to help, but y'all are making it HARD.
Because one patch wasn't committed before we tar'd up a new beta?
no, because the SCO/IBM/RED HAT lawsuits keep getting thrown in my face
everytime I ask for UnixWare specific changes.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.le
support. I need to know the cleanest way of
attacking that, so I don't break more platforms.
Actually, we **ONLY** have getpwuid_r, not gethostbyname_r nor strerror_r
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PRO
;s above is what's in cvs now, we're fine, but we still can't
--enable-thread-safety
due to the code in thread.c.
I'll shut up now.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:17:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
Don't start on the SCO issue. I submitted patches last weekend to fix
the UnixWare (and possibly other) issues.
You said you were working on them, then I see the note tha
are thrown in my face for complaining
about these facts.
I want to see PostgreSQL succeed and take over the Open Source DataBase
world, and
want to help, but y'all are making it HARD.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 23:00:46 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Thursday, August 28, 2003 01:06:46 -0400 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My UnixWare Thread.c
--On Friday, August 29, 2003 22:58:50 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Thursday, August 28, 2003 19:31:17 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
>> Beta2 is a done deal. When Bruce gets back fr
to happen.
Could someone tell the rest of the world ahead of time when release steps
are going to happen?
AND make sure key people are *NOT UNAVAILABLE* for issues?
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
201 - 300 of 811 matches
Mail list logo
