Re: [pgsql-ru-general] [HACKERS] Final call for translation updates

2005-01-06 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 06, 2005 3:48 AM Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 05:38 schrieb Oleg Bartunov: Serguei, I have translations (I didn't touch libpq, psql in work, other files seems complete) available from

[HACKERS] German-style quotes in the source file

2004-11-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hello Peter, I was about to update initdb translation, but noticed that newly introduced error messages in the code have German-style quotes. These propagated to the .po files now... It happened in this commit:

Re: [HACKERS] Why is WIN 1250 client only?

2004-08-10 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200 From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why is the encoding WIN 1250 only for the client side? It seems that with the new Windows port, folks will be interested in using it on the server side. Then what about WIN1251 (Cyrillic)? :) And all the

Re: [HACKERS] [DEFAULT] Releasing 7.4.3 ...

2004-06-08 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 08, 2004 2:27 PM Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:03:22 -0300 (ADT) From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Releasing 7.4.3 ... Next Monday, we're going to put out a 7.4.3 release, incorporating all the little patches that

Re: [HACKERS] mcxt.c

2003-09-08 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:57:30 -0400 From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gaetano Mendola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems inappropriate to me. Are you going to suggest that every routine that takes a pointer parameter needs to explicitly test for

Re: [HACKERS] complie error on windows

2003-01-03 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Greg Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 03, 2003 10:49 AM If you run, gcc, at the prompt (preferably the one you're trying to run configure from), do you get something like, gcc: No input files or do you get, gcc: command not found? If you get the

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III

2003-01-03 Thread Serguei Mokhov
hmmm... hate to resend it, but i have never seen this passing through... re-attempt - Original Message - From: Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 02, 2003 6:37 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff -- Take III - Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant.

2003-01-03 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 03, 2003 6:31 PM Tom Lane wrote: The system tables are not the problem. pg_upgrade has shown how we can have cross-version upgrades no matter how much the system catalogs change (a good thing too, because we

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff

2003-01-02 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 02, 2003 9:29 AM Maybe we should not try to be cute, but just do #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG) #define xo(long,short,desc) printf(%s %s\n, long, desc) #else #define xo(long,short,desc) printf(%s %s\n, short,

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff

2003-01-02 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 02, 2003 1:58 PM Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looks good to me, but there is still a little inconvenience of multiline option descriptions, and the above won't handle it nicely. True, a multiline

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff

2003-01-02 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG) #define xo(long,short,desc) printf(%s %s\n, long, desc) #else #define xo(long,short,desc) printf(%s %s\n, short, desc) #endif seems relatively generic, so it

[HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff

2003-01-01 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hello, Happy New Year everyone, Attached is an attempt to eliminate duplicate pg_dump option descriptions, and have a single description for both short and long options. For me, as for a translator, this eliminates the need to maintain the two, exactly same, sets of 24 sentences. If this is

Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump.options.diff

2003-01-01 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 02, 2003 1:34 AM Perhaps it would work better to do something like #ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG char* f_option = _(-f, --file=FILENAME ); ... etc ... #else /* not HAVE_GETOPT_LONG */ char* f_option = _(-f FILENAME

[HACKERS] Too late for translation updates?

2002-11-06 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hi, Can I still send in translation patches so that they get into 7.4 or is it too late already? If it's not late, what would be the 'deadline' then? Thanks, -- Serguei A. Mokhov ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Makefile.shlib

2002-09-04 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Olivier PRENANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 04, 2002 12:18 PM I think I figured why I can't buil plperl on unixware 711/OpenUnix 800. It seems Makefile.shlib has changed between 722 and 73 and -z text has been added. However with this on, it fails

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-22 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bill Studenmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:04 PM It means that when you want to use one of the built in functions (date_part, abs, floor, sqrt etc.) you don't have to prefix it with standard.. You can just say date_part(),

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-20 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bill Studenmund [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 8:22 AM My description of namespaces seems to have caused a fair bit of confusion. Let me try again. The ability of the package changes to automatically check standard when you give an

Re: [HACKERS] Place of PO files for NLS (was Re: [PATCHES] PG_DUMP NLS (Russian))

2001-10-08 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:25 PM I just thought I would point out that could get messy and many projects realizing this have created a po directory off the source tree to store the translations in. It might be

Re: [HACKERS] UTF-8 support

2001-10-07 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:12 AM Which ones belong to the backend and which ones to the frontend? Or even more: which ones belong to the backend, which ones to the frontend #1, which ones to the frontend #2, etc...

Re: [HACKERS] Accessing Database files on a read-only medium...like a CD.

2001-10-07 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Kelly Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... SO...I dug around through the code a little and found where the error was coming from and changed the code so that if the open attempt with O_RDWR fails, the code tries again

Re: [HACKERS] UTF-8 support

2001-09-23 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 7:58 PM 3) Is there a way to query available encodings in PostgreSQL for display in pgAdmin. Is it a planned feature in PostgreSQL 7.2? This would be nice if it existed. Example: function

Re: [HACKERS] UTF-8 support

2001-09-23 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 10:47 PM My question is now how many BE's/FE's would you return encodings for? I don't quite understand your question. What I thought were something like this: SELECT

Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes

2001-09-23 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: bpalmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 1:36 PM Since there have been drastic CVS changes, the web page doc should REALLY be updated... http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/cvs.html ... and CVSweb put back on-line

[HACKERS] [OT] http://www.postgresql.ca.org

2001-09-20 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Just discovered, by mistyping the www address... Interesting, whom does this one belong to? http://www.postgresql.ca.org -- Serguei A. Mokhov ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command

Re: [HACKERS] Case sensitive file names

2001-09-19 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Peter Bierman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:41 PM While checking out TOT pgsql today onto an HFS+ file system (case-preserving, case-insensitive), I hit the following CVS conflict: pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/utf8_to_alt.map

Re: [HACKERS] Major change to CVS effective immediately ...

2001-09-16 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 1:05 PM Now, I don't imagine it being *that* simple to move it over, so please let me know if anyone sees any errors on commits or stuff like that ... CVSweb seems to be screwed up. It

Re: [HACKERS] Major change to CVS effective immediately ...

2001-09-16 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 1:37 PM CVSWeb is going to be broken for a day or two, while Vince and I work out some issues as regards moving the main www site over to the same server ... but thanks for pointing it out,

[OT] Re: [HACKERS] User locks code

2001-08-24 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not for any other reason then for confusing people and making them have discussions like this. Yes, the

[OT] Re: [HACKERS] User locks code

2001-08-24 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM I really think that mixing licences inside one program is bad, if not for any other reason then for confusing people and making them have discussions like this. Yes, the

Re: [HACKERS] Link to bug webpage

2001-08-21 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:48 AM On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: Not only does it show the problems he had with PostgreSQL, he uses our bug list as an example of how PostgreSQL isn't advancing or

[HACKERS] List response time...

2001-08-21 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hi All, Looking at my message about the bug webpage and some other posts, I see that it was delayed for about 2h and a half. Some of the post were delayed for days... Why is that? Looks like the list has problems of some sort which cause these irregular delays. Just an annoying observation.

Re: [HACKERS] Guide to PostgreSQL source tree

2001-08-19 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Gavin Sherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 3:40 AM Hi all, For a few months now I've been thinking about whether or not a guide ('line-by-line') to the Postgres source tree would be of any value. [snip] So, what do people think?

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] encoding names

2001-08-18 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tatsuo Ishii [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 10:02 PM ALT - IBM866 Just a quick comment: ALT is not necessarily IBM866. It can be any US-ASCII or 26-character-alphabet Latin set, for example IBM819 or ISO8859-1. Is actually quite

Re: [HACKERS] int8 sequences --- small implementation problem

2001-08-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:09 AM typedef struct FormData_pg_sequence { NameData sequence_name; int64 last_value; #ifdef INT64_IS_BUSTED int32 pad1; [snip] } FormData_pg_sequence; This would work, I think, but my

Re: [HACKERS] int8 sequences --- small implementation problem

2001-08-14 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:28 AM Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This would work, I think, but my goodness it's an ugly solution. Is anything wrong with just having two int32 per value for this case? Well

Fw: [HACKERS] Translators wanted

2001-07-31 Thread Serguei Mokhov
The same applies as to my previous post... Sorry again. S. - Original Message - From: Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:50 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Translators wanted - Original Message - From: Peter

Fw: [HACKERS] Translators wanted

2001-07-31 Thread Serguei Mokhov
: Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:38 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Translators wanted Hello Peter, There was a little typo in line 73 in the original file libpq.pot: #: fe-connect.c:713 #, c-format msgid could not socket

Re: [HACKERS] Translators wanted

2001-07-15 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Hi all, - Original Message - From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 6:13 PM Those of you who wanted to help translating the messages of PostgreSQL programs and libraries, you can get started now. I've put up a page explaining

Fw: [HACKERS] Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?

2001-05-06 Thread Serguei Mokhov
Sorry, forgot to post to the list... - Original Message - From: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Serguei Mokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Being a simple user, I still want to view the stats from the table, but it should be limited only to the stuff I own. I don't wanna let others see

Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and count()

2001-04-29 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Casey Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thanks, naming conventions, and