On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 00:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
There's a small additional concern, though, which is that there's an
XPath 2.0 spec out there, and it modifies the type system and data model
rather heavily. So before we go adding functions, it'd probably be wise
to check that we're not
[ having now read the relevant threads a bit more carefully ... ]
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, it's not clear to me either which of those are still reasonable
candidates for committing as-is.
There are actually three XML-related patches
On Jul20, 2011, at 23:35 , Tom Lane wrote:
I find your argument against XPATH_STRING() a bit unconvincing.
The use case for that is not where you are trying to evaluate an
unknown, arbitrary XPath expression; it's where you are evaluating an
expression that you *know* returns string (ie, it
Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org writes:
There's a small additional concern, though, which is that there's an
XPath 2.0 spec out there, and it modifies the type system and data model
rather heavily. So before we go adding functions, it'd probably be wise
to check that we're not painting ourselves
On 2011-07-18 21:59, Robert Haas wrote:
There are only two patches left and I think we really ought to try to
take a crack at doing something with them. Yeb is working on the
userspace access vector cache patch, which I think is going drag on
longer than we want keep the CommitFest open, but
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
applied even if there are semantic errors elsewhere, I'm just as happy
to let Alexey or Florian have a go at it
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jul 19 12:09:24 -0400 2011:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
If you mean the business about allowing GUCs in postgresql.conf to be
applied even if there are semantic errors
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
As you can probably tell, we are not ready to end the commitfest. (I
think Robert gave me this CF to show why even talking about a one-week
mini-fest is a fantasy. If so, successful.).
Heh, heh. Well, it wasn't that
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
PATCHES WHICH HAVE BEEN UPDATED AND NEED FURTHER REVIEW:
* Cascade Replication
Sorry, too busy reviewing to take note of this. I expect to commit
when its tested and ready.
--
Simon Riggs
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
We're down to three patches that fall into this category: two XML
patches by Florian, which have been somewhat derailed by an argument
about whether values of type xml should, in fact, be required to be
valid xml (I think you know my vote on this
Simon,
* Cascade Replication
Sorry, too busy reviewing to take note of this. I expect to commit
when its tested and ready.
So, would that be this commitfest, or next commitfest?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Robert,
* Collect frequency statistics and selectivity estimation for arrays
* Allow multiple Postgres clusters running on the same machine to
distinguish themselves in the event log
* lazy vxid locks
I'm not clear on your criteria for moving these patches, as they seem
to be in somewhat
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
and an
error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
If you
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
We're down to three patches that fall into this category: two XML
patches by Florian, which have been somewhat derailed by an argument
about whether values of type xml should, in fact, be required to be
valid
On Jul18, 2011, at 22:19 , Tom Lane wrote:
and an
error-reporting patch that Tom weighed in on over the weekend. This
last suffers from the issue that it's not quite clear whether Tom is
going to do the work or whether he's expecting the submitter to do it.
If you mean the business about
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On a pgbench run with 8
clients on a 32-core machine, I see about a 2% speedup from that patch
on pgbench -S, and it grows to 8% at 32 clients. At 80 clients (but
still just a 32-core box), the results bounce around more, but taking
the
On Jul15, 2011, at 23:05 , Josh Berkus wrote:
* Bugfix for XPATH() if expression returns a scalar value
Well, Peter Eisentraut seemed to disagree with my approach initially,
and seemed to prefer a separate function for XPATH expressions which
return a scalar value.
All,
As you can probably tell, we are not ready to end the commitfest. (I
think Robert gave me this CF to show why even talking about a one-week
mini-fest is a fantasy. If so, successful.).
I've booted the patches which obviously aren't going to be immediately
ready. Nine patches are ready
18 matches
Mail list logo
