Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On 3/17/17 3:58 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > At Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:42:05 -0400, David Steele wrote > in <1e8297fd-f7f2-feab-848d-5121e45c8...@pgmasters.net> >> It has been a while since this thread has received any comments or a new >> patch. The general consensus seems

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

At Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:42:05 -0400, David Steele wrote in <1e8297fd-f7f2-feab-848d-5121e45c8...@pgmasters.net> > It has been a while since this thread has received any comments or a new > patch. The general consensus seems to be that this feature is too large > a rewrite of

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, On 3/1/17 9:38 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > At Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:39:01 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote > in <20170228153901.gh9...@tamriel.snowman.net> >> * David Fetter (da...@fetter.org) wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:17PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Tue, 28 Feb 2017 10:39:01 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote in <20170228153901.gh9...@tamriel.snowman.net> > * David Fetter (da...@fetter.org) wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:17PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > * Kyotaro HORIGUCHI

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

* David Fetter (da...@fetter.org) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:17PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote: > > > I suppose it is for suggesting what kind of word should come > > > there, or avoiding silence for a tab. Or for symmetry

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:53:17PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote: > > I suppose it is for suggesting what kind of word should come > > there, or avoiding silence for a tab. Or for symmetry with other > > types of manipulation, like DROP.

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

* Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote: > I suppose it is for suggesting what kind of word should come > there, or avoiding silence for a tab. Or for symmetry with other > types of manipulation, like DROP. Another possibility is creating > multiple objects with similar names,

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

At Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:43:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote in > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Michael Paquier writes: > >> On

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete >>> CREATE OBJECT with the

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete >> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind? > Isn't that to facilitate

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> So I'd be a whole lot happier if it didn't do that. Can we really not >>> add the desired

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Michael Paquier writes: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I'd be a whole lot happier if it didn't do that. Can we really not >> add the desired features in a more localized fashion? > As "if not exists" is defined after the

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> Yeah, maybe, but we'd need a committer to take more of an interest in >> this patch series. Personally, I'm wondering why we need a series of >> 19 patches to add tab completion

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Robert Haas writes: > Yeah, maybe, but we'd need a committer to take more of an interest in > this patch series. Personally, I'm wondering why we need a series of > 19 patches to add tab completion support for IF NOT EXISTS. The > feature which is the subject of this

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-02-26 19:43 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas : > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Pavel Stehule > wrote: > > Now first patch is broken :( > > > > It is pretty sensitive to any changes. Isn't possible to commit first > four > > patches first and

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Now first patch is broken :( > > It is pretty sensitive to any changes. Isn't possible to commit first four > patches first and separately maybe out of commitfest window? Yeah, maybe, but we'd need a committer to

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-02-14 11:51 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Thank you for the comment. > > At Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:10:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule > wrote in mail.gmail.com> > > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Thank you for the comment. At Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:10:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote in > > 0001-Refactoring-tab-complete-to-make-psql_completion-cod.patch > > - Just a refactoring of psql_completion >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2017-02-03 9:17 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Hello. This is the new version of this patch. > > - Rebased to the current master (555494d) > PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION stuff conflicted. > > - Fix a bug of CREATE

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello. This is the new version of this patch. - Rebased to the current master (555494d) PUBLICATION/SUBSCRIPTION stuff conflicted. - Fix a bug of CREATE INDEX(0012-Simplify-completion-for-CREATE-INDEX.patch). CREATE INDEX ON no longer gets a suggestion of "ON". - Added logging feature

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-02-01 9:37 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Thank you for reviewing. > > At Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:28:17 +0100, Pavel Stehule > wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Thank you for reviewing. At Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:28:17 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-01-31 11:10 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > At Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:07:55 +0900, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in 8v0X6A4gKQb2Uc=mc+...@mail.gmail.com> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pavel Stehule >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

At Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:07:55 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I found a error - I sent mail only to author 2016-12-31 :( - It is my > mistake. I am sorry Ah... Thanks for the update. No problem. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-01-31 6:56 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier : > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Pavel Stehule > wrote: > > I tested new set of these patches and I found some regressions there - > > mentioned in my last mail. > > > > Maybe I miss new update, bit

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

> > > > 2017-01-31 6:51 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier : > >> >> >> The current patch status was "waiting on author", but that's incorrect >> as a new series of this patch has been sent. Please be careful with >> the status of the CF app! I am moving it to next CF with "needs

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I tested new set of these patches and I found some regressions there - > mentioned in my last mail. > > Maybe I miss new update, bit I don't know about it. The last update I am aware of is that saying: "lot of

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2017-01-31 6:51 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier : > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > At Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:24:33 +0100, Pavel Stehule < > pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello, > > At Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:24:33 +0100, Pavel Stehule > wrote in > pavel.stehule> 2016-12-26 9:40

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:24:33 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote in pavel.stehule> 2016-12-26 9:40 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >: > > > > Thanks for reviewing but I

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-12-26 9:40 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > > Thanks for reviewing but I ran out of time for this CF.. > > > > I'm going to move this to the next CF. > > I splitted the patch into small pieces. f3fd531 conflicted to > this so rebased onto the current master

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:51:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote in > I am sure about benefit of all patches - but it is lot of changes in one > moment, and it is not necessary in this moment. > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-11-25 2:24 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Hello, > > Thank you for looking this long-and-bothersome patch. > > > At Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:12:00 +0100, Pavel Stehule > wrote in vd9fgpsgv...@mail.gmail.com> > > Hi > > > > 2016-11-15

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, Thank you for looking this long-and-bothersome patch. At Wed, 23 Nov 2016 07:12:00 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote in > Hi > > 2016-11-15 12:26 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-11-15 12:26 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Hello, I rebased this patch on the current master. > > At Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:15:48 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro > HORIGUCHI wrote in < >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

At Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:16:00 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20160929.161600.224338668.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > That looks better. I'll change the API as the following. > > COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(query); >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:50:29 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote in > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Stehule > wrote: > > I am thinking so commit's description

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Thank you for reviewing! At Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:11:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:49:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote in > This patch hasn't been updated in over a week and we're just about out > of time for this CommitFest, so I've marked it "Returned with >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Stehule > wrote: >> I am thinking so commit's description should be inside README > > Horiguchi-san, your patch has some whitespace issues, you

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I am thinking so commit's description should be inside README Horiguchi-san, your patch has some whitespace issues, you may want to get a run with git diff --check. Here are some things I have spotted:

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi > Pavel > > >> 2. Make keywords' case follow to input >> >> Allow the keywords suggested along with databse objects to >> follow the input letter case. The core part of this patch is a >> new function additional_kw_query(), which dynamically generates >> additional query string with

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-09-16 10:31 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hello, this is the new version. > > At Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:50:13 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro > HORIGUCHI wrote in < >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-09-16 10:31 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hello, this is the new version. > > At Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:50:13 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro > HORIGUCHI wrote in < >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Sat, 10 Sep 2016 07:40:16 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-09-06 15:00 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hello, this is the new version of this patch. Rebased on the > current master. > > At Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:06:51 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro > HORIGUCHI wrote in < >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:54:57 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi This patch needs rebase. Regards Pavel

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Thank you for looking this and for the comment. > > Since the end of this CF is quite soon and this seems in > uncommittable state, feel free to move this to the next CF if any > other patch with more

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Pavel Stehule writes: > 1. We want this patch - it increase a functionality of autocomplete TBH, I do not think that is an agreed-to statement. I concur with Peter's comments upthread questioning how much use-case there is for interactive completion of IF (NOT) EXISTS.

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-04-04 7:58 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Thank you for testing. That is a silly mistake, sorry. > > The attached is the fixed version. > > # Can I add a suffix to format-patche's output files? > > At Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:18:32 +0200, Pavel Stehule

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Thank you for testing. That is a silly mistake, sorry. The attached is the fixed version. # Can I add a suffix to format-patche's output files? At Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:18:32 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-04-02 7:16 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule : > Hi > > 2016-04-01 10:21 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < > horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > >> Hello, sorry for being a bit late. >> The attatched are the new version of the patch.. set. >> >> 1.

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-04-01 10:21 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hello, sorry for being a bit late. > The attatched are the new version of the patch.. set. > > 1. 0001-Suggest-IF-NOT-EXISTS-for-tab-completion-of-psql.patch > > Adds IF (NOT) EXISTS completion. It doesn't fix

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, sorry for being a bit late. The attatched are the new version of the patch.. set. 1. 0001-Suggest-IF-NOT-EXISTS-for-tab-completion-of-psql.patch Adds IF (NOT) EXISTS completion. It doesn't fix the issue that the case of additional keywords don't follow the input. 2.

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-04-01 4:52 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > At Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:22:20 +0200, Pavel Stehule > wrote in < > cafj8prd7vadunoiapb8exwc+c5ccis-rj2dphvzcwzkgxjb...@mail.gmail.com> > > 2016-03-30 10:34 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

At Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:22:20 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in > 2016-03-30 10:34 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < > horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > > > Hi, > > > > At Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:23:49 +0200,

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-03-30 10:34 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hi, > > At Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:23:49 +0200, Pavel Stehule > wrote in < > cafj8prbvka6ng4jwz2qmro7inudfjws5w0+demvgzznuf-h...@mail.gmail.com> > > Hi > > > > ... > > >> =# alter table if > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi, At Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:23:49 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in > Hi > > ... > >> =# alter table if > >> =# alter table if exists > >> == > >> =# alter table I > >> =# alter table IF EXISTS//

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi ... >> =# alter table if >> =# alter table if exists >> == >> =# alter table I >> =# alter table IF EXISTS// "information_schema" doesn't match. >> >> Since this is another problem from IF (NOT) EXISTS, this is >> in separate form. >> >> What do you think about this? >> > > +1 > The

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

No one should care of this but to make shure.. At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:12:03 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20160329.201203.78219296.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > By the way, memory blocks that readline sees are freed by it but >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-03-30 5:43 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Hello, > > At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:12:06 +0200, Pavel Stehule > wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:12:06 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

2016-03-29 12:08 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI < horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>: > Hi, Pavel. > > At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:59:01 +0200, Pavel Stehule > wrote in < > cafj8prdepggymz2axgtl33pud7x+xieao++wa+v9nqpqiyd...@mail.gmail.com> > > > > On 3/18/16 3:22 AM, Pavel

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi, thank you for the suggestion. At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:54:01 +0300, Artur Zakirov wrote in <56fa50b9.7000...@postgrespro.ru> > On 29.03.2016 10:59, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > I am looking this patch. It looks well, but this feature doesn't > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi, Pavel. At Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:59:01 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote in > > > On 3/18/16 3:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > > > > I am looking this patch. It looks well, but this feature doesn't >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On 29.03.2016 10:59, Pavel Stehule wrote: Hi 2016-03-29 8:43 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >: Thank you Pavel, David. Thank you for pointing syntaxes to be addressed. Most of the are addressed in the attached

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-03-29 8:43 GMT+02:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Thank you Pavel, David. > > Thank you for pointing syntaxes to be addressed. Most of the are > addressed in the attached patch. > > > At Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:57:27 -0400, David Steele >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Thank you Pavel, David. Thank you for pointing syntaxes to be addressed. Most of the are addressed in the attached patch. At Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:57:27 -0400, David Steele wrote in <56f17977.8040...@pgmasters.net> > Hi Kyotaro, > > On 3/18/16 3:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi Kyotaro, On 3/18/16 3:22 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > I am looking this patch. It looks well, but this feature doesn't > respect upper or lower chars. It enforce upper chars. This is not > consistent with any other autocomplete. > > > I checked it against sql help and these

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > wrote: >> Hello, this is the new version of this patch. > > The CommitFest entry for this patch is messed up. It shows no author, >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-03-17 21:02 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule : > Hi > > > I am looking this patch. It looks well, but this feature doesn't respect > upper or lower chars. It enforce upper chars. This is not consistent with > any other autocomplete. > I checked it against sql help and

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hi 2016-03-16 5:01 GMT+01:00 Kyotaro HORIGUCHI : > Hello, > > # It seems that I have been forgotten in the recepient list.. > > At Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:09:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut > wrote in <56e8c077.2000...@gmx.net> > > On 2/5/16 3:09 AM,

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Mmm. Have I broken the entry? At Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:55:24 -0400, David Steele wrote in <56e84c8c.7060...@pgmasters.net> > On 3/15/16 1:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > > wrote: > >> Hello,

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, # It seems that I have been forgotten in the recepient list.. At Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:09:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote in <56e8c077.2000...@gmx.net> > On 2/5/16 3:09 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > > I considered how to make tab-completion robust for syntactical > >

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On 2/5/16 3:09 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > I considered how to make tab-completion robust for syntactical > noises, in other words, optional words in syntax. Typically "IF > (NOT) EXISTS", UNIQUE and TEMPORARY are words that don't affect > further completion. To repeat the question I raised in

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On 3/15/16 1:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > wrote: >> Hello, this is the new version of this patch. > > The CommitFest entry for this patch is messed up. It shows no author, > even though I'm pretty sure that a

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello, this is the new version of this patch. The CommitFest entry for this patch is messed up. It shows no author, even though I'm pretty sure that a patch has to have one by definition.

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, this is the new version of this patch. At Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:17:26 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote in <20160226.131726.54224488.horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > Hello, thank you for the comments. > > At Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:43:57

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, thank you for the comments. At Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:43:57 +0300, Artur Zakirov wrote in <56c1c80d.7020...@postgrespro.ru> > On 05.02.2016 11:09, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I considered how to make tab-completion robust for syntactical > > noises,

Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

On 05.02.2016 11:09, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: Hello, I considered how to make tab-completion robust for syntactical noises, in other words, optional words in syntax. Typically "IF (NOT) EXISTS", UNIQUE and TEMPORARY are words that don't affect further completion. However, the current

[HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion

Hello, I considered how to make tab-completion robust for syntactical noises, in other words, optional words in syntax. Typically "IF (NOT) EXISTS", UNIQUE and TEMPORARY are words that don't affect further completion. However, the current delimit-matching mechanism is not so capable (or is