On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
What about the attached patch then?
Thanks for this update. This looks good. Here are a couple of small
comments:
1) This sentence is correct English, but I don't recall seeing in the docs
such a formulation:
+
On 2014-09-29 21:48:08 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
What about the attached patch then?
Thanks for this update. This looks good. Here are a couple of small
comments:
1) This sentence is correct English, but
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
-except that changes are returned as typebytea/type.
+except that changes are returned as typebytea/type and that it
can
+be used on slots using output plugins that only support binary
output.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
Do you see the difference between what your doc patch states and the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
Do
Hi all,
As there has been a dump of CATALOG_VERSION_NO on REL9_4_STABLE
recently, I am coming back to the options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* that are
rather confusing for developers of decoder plugins. In short, when
extracting changes from a replication slot, a decoder plugin is free
to set one option that
Hi,
On 2014-09-18 02:14:48 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
As there has been a dump of CATALOG_VERSION_NO on REL9_4_STABLE
recently, I am coming back to the options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* that are
rather confusing for developers of decoder plugins. In short, when
extracting changes from a replication
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The point is that operating with byteas on SQL level is freaking
painful.
An example perhaps? I fail to see why it is related to the fact that a
user could simply use that to fetch changes in bytea from a slot:
select
On 2014-09-18 08:57:26 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The point is that operating with byteas on SQL level is freaking
painful.
An example perhaps? I fail to see why it is related to the fact that a
user could
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Improving the docs here is on my roadmap, but I don't see the benefit of
this.
Btw, I sent a couple of weeks back a patch that was an attempt to
improve this portion of the docs, feel free to have a look if that
helps
On 2014-09-18 09:13:48 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Improving the docs here is on my roadmap, but I don't see the benefit of
this.
Btw, I sent a couple of weeks back a patch that was an attempt to
improve this
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-09-18 09:13:48 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Improving the docs here is on my roadmap, but I don't see the benefit of
this.
On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
Do you see the difference between what your doc patch states and the
explanation I've given nearby in this thread?
Perhaps that's the lack of documentation...
Man. I've explained it to you about three times. The previous attempts
at doing
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
Do you see the difference between what your doc patch states and the
explanation I've given nearby in this thread?
Perhaps that's the lack of documentation...
14 matches
Mail list logo
