Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Also, I've realized the last interval may not be logged at all - I'll
> take a look into this in the next version of the patch.
I didn't see any later version of this patch posted anywhere. I guess
it'll have to wait until the next commitfest. Please fix the remaining
issu
On 3.9.2012 01:28, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>> Fixed. I've kept use_log_agg only and I've removed the default. Also
>> I've added one more check (that the total duration is a multiple of
>> the aggregation interval).
>
> Hi Tomas,
>
> In the docs
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
> Fixed. I've kept use_log_agg only and I've removed the default. Also
> I've added one more check (that the total duration is a multiple of
> the aggregation interval).
Hi Tomas,
In the docs, -l is an option, not an application:
"-l"
Also,
Dne 30.08.2012 18:02, Robert Haas napsal:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
This patch is a bit less polished (and more complex) than the other
pgbench patch I've sent a while back, and I'm not sure how to handle
the
Windows branch. That needs to be fixed during the commit
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> It does, but AFAIK the "-l" means logging. I suppose
> "--aggregate-interval" would be a good option name, I don't see a reason
> to put there the additional word when there are other aggregated values
> (e.g. num of transactions).
Oh, I was
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 30 Srpen 2012, 18:02, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> This patch is a bit less polished (and more complex) than the other
>>> pgbench patch I've sent a while back, and I'm not sure how to hand
On 30 Srpen 2012, 23:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 30 Srpen 2012, 18:02, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
This patch is a bit less polished (and more complex) than the other
pgbench patch I'
On 30 Srpen 2012, 18:02, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> This patch is a bit less polished (and more complex) than the other
>> pgbench patch I've sent a while back, and I'm not sure how to handle the
>> Windows branch. That needs to be fixed during the
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> This patch is a bit less polished (and more complex) than the other
> pgbench patch I've sent a while back, and I'm not sure how to handle the
> Windows branch. That needs to be fixed during the commit fest.
What's the problem with the Window
On 24 Srpen 2012, 23:25, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds support for aggregation of info written into the log.
> Instead of info about each transaction, a summary for time intervals (with
> custom length) is written into the log. All you need to do is add "-A
> seconds", e.g.
>
> $
Hi,
this patch adds support for aggregation of info written into the log.
Instead of info about each transaction, a summary for time intervals (with
custom length) is written into the log. All you need to do is add "-A
seconds", e.g.
$ pgbench -T 3600 -A 10 -l db
which will produce log with 10
11 matches
Mail list logo