Euler Taveira de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You just consider the plain text attachments. What about the encoded
attachments [1] and the gziped [2] ones?
And what of people who sent patches in-line (not as MIME-ified
attachments)? Or who sent them to -hackers instead of -patches?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Berkus originally wrote:
Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count
of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180.
Perhaps this is the gist of the problem: the 180 count was not patch
This thread somehow reminds me how the company I'm working for
tries to measure my profitability: lines of code edited,
number of bugs fixed in what time, and other odd things :-)
Sorry if this is the wrong subject ...
Greg Sabino Mullane schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josh Berkus originally wrote:
Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count
of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180.
Perhaps this is the gist of the problem:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
please let me know the URL for the message, so that I can see what it
was overlooked, and see if I can't improve the 'search' ...
Marc - here is one I submitted that was not picked up :-)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-01/msg00145.php
regards
Mark
Hi Tom,
Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual
attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind
would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there
aren't some non-patch attachments on -patches as well.
That's why we need a Bug Tracking
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Hi Tom,
Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual
attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind
would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there
aren't some non-patch attachments on
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of
names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't
going to work.
Matthew
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Using the same search for 7.4 shows only 48 patch submitters, based on
posts to pgsql-patches ...
Aizaz
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names
missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to
work.
When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I said,
this list is of all
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of
names missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't
going to work.
When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots of names
missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't going to
work.
When you submit'd your
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Well I'm positive I submitted all my pg_autovacuum patches to the
patches list, however searching the archives for autovacuum I can't
find anything that old. How far back to the searchable archives go?
back to 96 or so ...
Hi Marc,
I think I'm telling you what you already know, but there are lots
of names
missing from that list (myself included), so that process isn't
going to
work.
Me too. Maybe some improvement in the routine.
When you submit'd your patch, where did you submit this to? As I
Marc and/or Bruce:
Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count
of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the
Josh Berkus wrote:
Marc and/or Bruce:
Hey, for my information (people ask me this a lot) can one of you do a count
of patch submitters for 8.0? For 7.4, it was around 180.
How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
--
Bruce Momjian|
Marc,
How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*,
not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox.
--Josh
--
__Aglio Database Solutions___
Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus wrote:
Marc,
How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*,
not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox.
I didn't do it, but it might have been a guess of
yOn Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Marc,
How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*,
not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox.
I didn't do it,
Josh Berkus josh@agliodbs.com writes:
How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*,
not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox.
Trolling through the pgsql-patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I didn't do it, but it might have been a guess of mine.
Ya, I don't recall doing it either :)
I did it last time. It's been a while now, but I think what I
did was basically look at all the commit messages from the
previous release to the
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I did it last time. It's been a while now, but I think what I
did was basically look at all the commit messages from the
previous release to the current one, and then used a perl script
to extract everything that looked like a name or an email
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
But let me see if I can come up with some *very* rought #s ...
57 ...
Alvaro Herrera
Andreas Pflug
Andrew Dunstan
Andrew Hammond
Bruce Momjian
Christopher Kings-Lynne
Claudio Natoli
Dave Page
David Fetter
Dennis Bjorklund
Ed L.
Fabien COELHO
Gaetano
Using the same search for 7.4 shows only 48 patch submitters, based on
posts to pgsql-patches ...
Aizaz Ahmed
Alvaro Herrera
Andreas Pflug
Andrew Dunstan
Barry Lind
Bertrand Petit
Bruce Momjian
Bruno Wolff
Christopher Browne
Christopher Kings-Lynne
Dave Cramer
Dennis Bj#xF6;rklund
Fernando
23 matches
Mail list logo
