Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
>> 2. Why have a finish.replication file, rather than "SELECT
>> pg_finish_replication()"?
>
> I thought that the trigger file method was more easy-to-use for the
> existing users since it had been used in pg_standby for
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Richard Huxton wrote:
> 2. Why have a finish.replication file, rather than "SELECT
> pg_finish_replication()"?
I thought that the trigger file method was more easy-to-use for the
existing users since it had been used in pg_standby for a long time
so far. So I used
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
>> forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
>> fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
>
> Yeah, I think that's the main weakness of the name "standby_mod
On 12/02/10 15:37, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
Well, let's come up with something else then.
continuous_recovery ?
One problem with the otherwise entirely wonderful HS/SR pairing is the
whole business of the config parameters. They feel too botto
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, let's come up with something else then.
continuous_recovery ?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
>> forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
>> fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
>
> Yeah, I think that's the main
Robert Haas wrote:
> Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be
> forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in
> fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do.
Yeah, I think that's the main weakness of the name "standby_mode". It's
pretty descriptive otherwis
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> That doesn't accurately describe what the standby_mode setting does. It
> doesn't imply streaming replication. It means that the server doesn't
> end recovery when it reaches end of WAL, but keeps trying.
I think I'm going to add my nam
Simon Riggs wrote:
> * "entering standby mode" isn't a more informative message. Two people
> have already said on-list that "standby mode" name might need to be
> changed.
Well, I'm all ears for better suggestions.
> More informative, for me, would be something like "entering
> streaming replica
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 09:49 +, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Log Message:
> ---
> Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server. Don't
> echo all the recovery.conf options. Don't emit the "initializing
> recovery connections" message, which doesn't mean anything to a user.
10 matches
Mail list logo
