[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:46:09AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > On Jul 10, 2017 16:08, "Tom Lane" wrote: > >> Okay, so that leaves us with a decision to make: push it into beta2, or > >> wait till after wrap? I find it pretty

[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Noah Misch writes: > > I recommend pushing your patch so the August back-branch releases have it. > > One can see by inspection that your patch has negligible effect on systems > > healthy today. I have a reasonable

[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

On Jul 10, 2017 16:08, "Tom Lane" wrote: Noah Misch writes: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, being able to reproduce the problem reliably enough to say whether >> it's fixed or not is definitely the sticking point here.

[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > I recommend pushing your patch so the August back-branch releases have it. > One can see by inspection that your patch has negligible effect on systems > healthy today. I have a reasonable suspicion it will help some

[HACKERS] Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Kapila writes: > > Sure. I think it is slightly tricky because specs don't say clearly > > how ASLR can impact the behavior of any API and in my last attempt I > > could not reproduce the issue. > > > I