Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-06-08 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
At Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:52:31 +0200, Vik Fearing wrote in <5751454f.6020...@2ndquadrant.fr> > On 01/06/16 02:49, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, David G. Johnston > > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-06-06 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> >> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is >> not *only* a list of names anymore. >> >> synchronous_standby_config? >>

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-06-03 Thread Vik Fearing
On 01/06/16 02:49, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, David G. Johnston > wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: Are we

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-06-01 Thread Masahiko Sawada
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, David G. Johnston > wrote: >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut >> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM,

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-05-31 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: >> >> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: >>> >>> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-05-31 Thread David G. Johnston
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > >> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is >> not *only* a list of names anymore. >> >> synchronous_standby_config? >>

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-05-31 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is not *only* a list of names anymore. synchronous_standby_config? synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)? If the existing values are still going to be accepted,

Re: [HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-05-31 Thread Tom Lane
Jaime Casanova writes: > Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is > not *only* a list of names anymore. > synchronous_standby_config? > synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)? I could get behind renaming it to

[HACKERS] Rename synchronous_standby_names?

2016-05-31 Thread Jaime Casanova
Hi, Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is not *only* a list of names anymore. synchronous_standby_config? synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7