Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Joe Conway
On 03/30/2017 10:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane > wrote: > > Robert Haas > > writes: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > - Alvaro proposes allowing more time next time, but not to change the > dates for this time. FWIW I didn't realize that the NY conference was ongoing, so count me for postponing the end of the current CF. -- Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I propose we go for a week delay in closing the commit fest, and we > >> decide right now. Ideally

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Petr Jelinek
On 30/03/17 16:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > >> - Alvaro proposes allowing more time next time, but not to change the >> dates for this time. > > FWIW I didn't realize that the NY conference was ongoing, so count me > for postponing the end of the current CF. > +1, the

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Stephen Frost
* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Robert Haas writes: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I propose we go for a week delay in closing the commit fest, and we > >> decide right now. Ideally I like to to see delay in

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I propose we go for a week delay in closing the commit fest, and we >> decide right now. Ideally I like to to see delay in one-week increments >> _and_ announce that a week

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I agree we need to extend, and not wait until any longer to do it. We > have people at the NYC conference and I don't want their memory of the > conference being that they were stressed trying to work on closing the >

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:35:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, formally speaking, the RMT declares the onset of feature freeze. > I expressed an opinion that they'd probably do so at the end of March, > but it's their call as to exactly when to do so, and whether to grant > any limited

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > I was rather surprised to see the March commitfest declared to exactly > > one month and feature freeze immediately thereafter. > > That's true, but at >

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Dave Page
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-03-29 16:04:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >> >> > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in >> > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Andres Freund
On 2017-03-29 16:04:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in > > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain > > open and what the prospects are for getting them done. (In the past > >

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in >> the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain >> open and what the prospects are for getting them

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain > open and what the prospects are for getting them done. (In the past > we've sometimes let the final fest stretch on indefinitely,

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-29 Thread Stephen Frost
Tom, all, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain > open and what the prospects are for getting them done. (In the past > we've sometimes let the final

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> As previously agreed at the PGCon 2016 developers meeting, we'll >> institute v10 feature freeze at the completion of the current >> commitfest (end of this month). > This

Re: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > As previously agreed at the PGCon 2016 developers meeting, we'll > institute v10 feature freeze at the completion of the current > commitfest (end of this month). This means, as I understand it, that no new features should

[HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10

2017-03-23 Thread Tom Lane
The Postgres release team has decided that last year's appointment of a Release Management Team worked pretty well, so we're going to run the version-10 release cycle the same way. The members of the RMT for this year will be Peter Eisentraut, Robert Haas, and Noah Misch. As previously agreed at