Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Zdenek Kotala wrote: > Andrew Dunstan p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500: > > > > > Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them? > > Hi Andrew, > > The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which > was reinstalled and now they are used for

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-15 Thread Zdenek Kotala
Andrew Dunstan píše v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500: > > Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them? Hi Andrew, The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which was reinstalled and now they are used for different purpose. It was planned befor

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-10 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > If someone didn't notice, I have applied that fix and it appears to > have solved it. ... and there was much rejoicing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-10 Thread Magnus Hagander
2010/2/9 Magnus Hagander : > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:11, Tom Lane wrote: >> Magnus Hagander writes: >>> Here's a patch that "fixes" this. I put it locally for the radius >>> authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should >>> we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this goo

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 17:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> Here's a patch that "fixes" this. I put it locally for the radius >> authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should >> we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this good for now? > > How about dropping

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > Here's a patch that "fixes" this. I put it locally for the radius > authentication for now, since we don't use this anywhere else. Should > we put this in /port/ somewhere, or is this good for now? How about dropping it in src/backend/port/win32/mingwcompat.c ? The adva

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 13:52, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 02:20, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan writes: >>> Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a >>> recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h >>> in there. >>

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 02:20, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan writes: >> Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a >> recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h >> in there. > > That was discussed already.  I assume Magnus is going to ad

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Michael Meskes
> For the regression test, I am inclined to just do > > #ifdef WIN32 > #define isnan(x) _isnan(x) > #define isinf(x) _isinf(x) > #endif Well the isinf() macro is different in win32.h. I did make a change and apparently red_bat is now green again. Hopefully that was it. Michael -- Michael Me

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Michael Meskes írta: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:20:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan function on the ECPG tests. >>> Do we need to link in a math lib or something there? >>> >> It looks to me like the problem is that that test is being compi

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tuesday, February 9, 2010, Dave Page wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: >> Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look >> at >> it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition. :-) >> >> Looking at the portabili

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Dave Page
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look > at > it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition. :-) > > Looking at the portability header file it appears that isnan/isinf are only >

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-09 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:20:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan function on the ECPG tests. > > Do we need to link in a math lib or something there? > > It looks to me like the problem is that that test is being compiled > without benefit of any platform

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-08 Thread Mark Wong
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them? > > They're not *all* dead, but it sure looks like Oracle scaled that lab > way back the moment they owned it.  I'm surprised any of them are still > alive :-( We still h

Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a > recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h > in there. That was discussed already. I assume Magnus is going to address it as soon as he gets back from FOSDEM. > MSVC

[HACKERS] buildfarm breakage

2010-02-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
It looks like some recent patches have broken a couple of things on the buildfarm. Mingw builds are missing in6addr_any in backend/libpq/auth.c, added by a recent RADIUS support fix. Looks like we might need to include win32.h in there. MSVC builds are broken from a missing _isnan function